Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2009
1 On which B. strangely fails to cite Campbell, M., Echoes and Imitations of Early Epic in Apollonius Rhodius (Mnemosyne Suppl. 72, 1981).Google Scholar
2 B. seems unaware that Maas's study of the tradition in Byz.-neugr. Jb. 5 (1926–1927)Google Scholar and his fusillade of emendations in Jahresber., Phil. Verein Berlin 47 (1921) are conveniently available in his Kleine Schriften.
3 On p. 54, Hiatus 2, ‘and prepositions’ should read ‘or before prepositions’. The reading adopted at 84 is a noteworthy exception to the rule. A short open final syllable lengthened by initial double consonant is more frequent than here implied; see in this Hymn 11, 28, 30, 60, 67, 76, 136, 138.
4 There is an odd note in the commentary to the same effect.
5 Cf. Meister, K., Die homerische Kunstsprache (1921), 13ff., 36.Google Scholar
6 Wrongly H. ad loc., ‘πωλ- is nowhere attested’.
7 But of course not in Tyrtaeus, nor in Pindar (cf. N. S. Grinbaum, Язьικ лревΗегречесκοй хоровой лириκи (Πиндар)(Kishinev, 1973), 10O–2), nor in Theocritus' epic poems (13.53, 24.76; cf. Wilamowitz, , Textgesch. d. griech. Bukoliker, 99).Google Scholar B. should not have referred to these poets.
8 Schwyzer – Debrunner 626. The Homeric and Euripidean passages there cited are normally printed as questions.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.