Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:35:20.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of Latin Words in -cinio-, -cinia-

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Edwin W. Fay
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 18 , Issue 7 , October 1904 , pp. 349 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1904

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 350 note 1 Prof. M. Warren suspects canier of not being a real word; cf. his St. Gall. Gloss, c. 115.

page 351 note 1 See Schanz, Röm. Litteraturgeschichte, § 9, who, after a synoptic debate whether such dramatic saturae existed or not, reaches an affirmative conclusion.

page 351 note 2 The derivation of uenēficus from *uenesficus has difficulties to meet opifex munificus. On the other hand, we may account for *uene[ni]- ficus from either *uénēnificus or *uenenificus (cf. Lindsay's Captivi, Appendix, § 1, and especially dīmidius), but hardly from *uenēníficus.