Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T16:43:59.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isomorphous cation distribution in celadonites, glauconites and Fe-illites determined by infrared, Mössbauer and EXAFS spectroscopies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

V. A. Drits ,
L. G. Dainyak ,
F. Muller ,
G. Besson  and
A. Manceau
V. A. Drits
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky per. 7, Moscow, Russia
L. G. Dainyak
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevsky per. 7, Moscow, Russia
F. Muller
Affiliation:
CRMD, University of Orléans - CNRS, BP 6759, 45067 Orléans, Cedex 2, France
G. Besson
Affiliation:
CRMD, University of Orléans - CNRS, BP 6759, 45067 Orléans, Cedex 2, France
A. Manceau
Affiliation:
Environmental Geochemistry Group, LGIT, IRIGM, University of Grenoble, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Celadonite, glauconite and Fe-illite samples were studied by XRD, EXAFS, IR and Mössbauer spectroscopy. The samples were monomineralic and corresponded to 1M polytype. In the OH-stretching region of the IR spectra the content of each definite pair of cations bonded to OH groups was determined. The number of heavy (Fe) and light (Al, Mg) octahedral cations nearest to Fe was found by the EXAFS technique. The predicted quadrupole splitting values for each definite arrangement of cations nearest to Fe3+ were used to interpret the Mössbauer spectra. After the fitting procedure, the intensity of each doublet corresponded to a definite set of local cation arrangements around Fe3+ and to a definite occurrence probability of these arrangements. Computer simulation and the experimental data obtained were used to reconstruct the distribution of isomorphous octahedral cations in the 2:1 layers. For all samples, R2+ cations prefer to occupy one of the two symmetrically independent cis-sites and R2+-R2+ and/or Al-Fe3+ were prohibited in the directions forming ± 120° with the b axis. Therefore, octahedral sheets of the samples revealed domain structure, in which domains differ in size, in the nature of predominant cation and/or by cation ordering.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 153 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, S.W. (1984) Crystal chemistry of the true mica. Pp. 13–60 in: Micas. (Bailey, S.W., editor). Reviews in Mineralogy, Mineralogical Society of America, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, G. & Drits, V.A. (1997a) Refined relationships between chemical composition of dioctahedral finedispersed mica minerals and their infrared spectra in the OH stretching region. Part I: Identification of the stretching bands. Clays Clay Miner. 45, 158–169.Google Scholar
Besson, G. & Drits, V.A. (1997b) Refined relationships between chemical composition of dioctahedral finedispersed mica minerals and their infrared spectra in the OH stretching region. Part II: The main factors affecting OH vibration and quantitative analysis. Clays Clay Miner: 45, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, G., Drits, V.A., Dainyak, L.G. & Smoliar, B.B. (1987) Analysis of cation distribution in dioctahedral micaceous minerals on the basis of IR-spectroscopy data. Clay Miner. 22, 465–478.Google Scholar
Besson, G., Bookin, A.S., Dainyak, L.G., Rautureau, M., Tsipursky, S.I., Tchoubar, C. & Drits, V.A. (1983) Use of diffraction and Mössbauer methods for the structural and crystallochemical characterization of nontronite. J. Appl. Cryst. 16, 374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookin, A.S., Dainyak, L.G. & Drits, V.A. (1978) Interpretation of the Mössbauer spectra of layer silicates on the basis of structural modelling. Phys. Chem. Min. 3, 58–59.Google Scholar
Cardile, C.M. & Brown, I.W.M. (1988) An 57Fe Mössbauer and X-ray diffraction study of New Zealand glauconites. Clay Miner. 23, 13–25.Google Scholar
Dainyak, L.G. & Drits, V.A. (1987) Interpretation of the Mössbauer spectra of nontronite, celadonite, and glauconite. Clays Clay Miner. 35, 363–372.Google Scholar
Dainyak, L.G., Bookin, A.S. & Drits, V.A. (1984a) Interpretation of Mössbauer spectra of dioctahedral Fe3+ 2:1 layer silicates. II. Nontronite. Kristallogrqfiya, 29, 304–311 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Dainyak, L.G., Bookin, A.S. & Drits, V.A. (1984b) Interpretation of Mössbauer spectra of dioctahedral Fe3+-containing 2:1 layer silicates. III. Celadonite. Kristallografiya, 29, 312–321 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Dainyak, L.G., Drits, V.A. & Heifits, L.M. (1992) Computer simulation of cation distribution in dioctahedral 2:1 layer silicates using IR-data: Application to M(Sssbauer spectroscopy of a glauconite sample. Clays Clay Miner. 40, 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dainyak, L.G., Bookin, V.A., Drits, V.A. & Tsipursky, S.I. (1981) Mössbauer and electron diffraction study of cation distribution in celadonite. Acta Co'st. A37 (suppl.), C-362.Google Scholar
Dainyak, L.G., Dainyak, B.A., Bookin, A.S. & Drits, V.A. (1984c) Interpretation of Mössbauer spectra of dioctahedral Fe3+-containing 2:1 layer silicates. I. Computation of electric field gradients on the basis of structural modelling. Kristallografiya, 29, 94–100 (in Russian).Google Scholar
De Grave, E., Vandenbruwaene, J. & Elewaut, E. (1985) An 57Fe Mössbauer effect study on glauconites from different locations in Belgium and northern France. Clay Miner. 20, 171–179.Google Scholar
Drits, V.A. & McCarty, D. (1996) Diffraction effects from illite and illite-smectites consisting of interstratified trans-vacant and cis-vacant 2:1 layers; a semi-quantitative technique for determination of layer-type content. Am. Miner. 81, 852–863.Google Scholar
Drits, V.A., Tsipursky, S.I. & Plançon, A. (1984b) Application of the method for the calculation of intensity distribution to electron diffraction structure analysis. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Ser. Phys. 2, 1708–1713 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Drits, V.A., Weber, F., Salyn, A.L. & Tsipursky, S.I. (1993a) X-ray identification of one-layer illite varieties: application to the study of illites around uranium deposits of Canada. Clays Clay Miner. 41, 389–398.Google Scholar
Drits, V.A., Plançon, A., Sakharov, B.A., Besson, G., Tsipursky, S.I. & Tchoubar, C. (1984a) Diffraction effects calculated for structural models of Ksaturated montmorillonite containing different types of defects. Clay Miner. 19, 541–562.Google Scholar
Drits, V.A., Kameneva, M.Yu., Sakharov, B.A., Dainyak, L.G., Tsipursky, S.I., Smoliar, B.B., Bookin, A.S. & Salyn, A.L. (1993b) Problems of the determination of the actual crystal structures of glauconites and related minerals, 200 pp. Novosibirsk, Nauka (in Russian).Google Scholar
Govaert, A., De Grave, E., Quartier, H., Chambaere, D. & Robrecht, G.G. (1978) Mössbauer analysis of glauconites of different Belgian finding places. J. Phys. Colloq. C2, 442–444.Google Scholar
Hargraves, P., Rancourt, D.C. & Lalonde, A.E. (1990) Single-crystal Mössbauer study of phlogopite mica. Can. J. Phys. 68, 128–144.Google Scholar
Heller-Kallai, L. & Rozenson 1. (1981) The use of Mössbauer spectroscopy of iron in clay mineralogy. Phys. Chem. Min. 7, 223–238.Google Scholar
Ivanovskaya, T.A., Tsipursky, S.1. & Yakovleva, O.V. (1989) Mineralogy of globular glauconites from Vendian and Rephean of the Urals and Siberia. Litologiya and poleznii iskopaemiya, 3, 83–89 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Johnston, J.H. & Cardile, C.M. (1987) Iron substitution in montmorillonite, illite, and glauconite by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. Clays Clay Miner. 35, 170–176.Google Scholar
Kotlicki, A., Szczyrba, J. & Wiewiora, A. (1981) Mössbauer study of glauconites from Poland. Clay Miner. 16, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkova, K.M. (1956) On celadonite of Pobuzhyie. Zapiski Lvovskogo Mineralogicheskogo obchestva. 10, 305–318 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Manceau, A. & Calas, G. (1986) Nickel-bearing clay minerals; II. Intracrystalline distribution of nickel: an X-ray absorption study. Clay Miner. 21, 34–360.Google Scholar
Manceau, A. & Combes, J.M. (1988) Structure of Mn and Fe oxides and oxyhydroxides: a topological approach by EXAFS. Phys. Chem. Min. 15, 283-295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manceau, A., Bonnin, D., Stone, W.E.E. & Sanz, J. (1990) Distribution of Fe in the octahedral sheet of trioctahedral micas by polarized EXAFS. Comparison with NMR results. Phys. Chem. Min. 17, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murad, E. & Wagner, U. (1994) The Mössbauer spectrum of illites. Clay Miner. 29, 1–10.Google Scholar
McKale, A.G., Veal, B.W., Paulikas, A.P., Chan Sk. & Knapp, G.S. (1988) Improved ab initio calculations of amplitude and phase functions for extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 12, 3763–3768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlishin, V.I., Platonov, A.N., Polshin, E.V., Semenova, T.F. & Starova, G.K. (1978) Micas with iron in tetrahedral coordination. Zapiski Vsesouznogo Mineralogicheskogo obchestva, 107, 165–175 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Popov, V.I., Khramov, D.A. & Lobanov, F.I. (1988) Absorber shape: The influence on the Mössbauer specrum parameter. Proc. USSR Conf AppL Mössbauer Spectroscopy “Volga”, Moscow, 32–33 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Rancourt, D.G. (1994) Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Minerals. II Problem of resolving cis and trans octahedral Fe2+ sites. Phys. Chem. Min. 21, 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. & Thompson, C.H. (1993) Illite from the Potsdam Sandstone of New York, a probable noncentrosymmetric mica structure. Clays Clay Miner. 41, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenson, I. & Heller-Kallai, L. (1978) Mössbauer spectra of glauconites reexamined. Clays Clays Minerals 26, 173-175.Google Scholar
Sainctavit, Ph., Petiau, J., Manceau, A., RivalIant, R., Belakhovsky, M. & Renaud, G. (1988) A two-mirror device for higher harmonic rejection. Nucl. lnstrum. Methods, A 273, 423–428.Google Scholar
Sakharov, B.A., Besson, G., Drits, V.A., Kamaneva, M.Y., Salyn, A.L. & Smolyar, B.B. (1990) X-ray study of the nature of stacking faults in the structure of glauconites. Clay Miner. 25, 419–435.Google Scholar
Shutov, V.D., Drits, V.A., Kats, M. Ya. & Sokolova, A.L. (1975) Crystal chemistry of glauconites as indicator of facial conditions of formation and postsedimentary transformation of these minerals. Pp. 74–81 in: Crystal Chemistry of Minerals and Geological Problems (Kossovskaya, A.G., editor). Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
Slonimskaya, M.V., Besson, G., Dainyak, L.G., Tchoubar, C. & Drits, V.A. (1986) The interpretation of the IR spectra of celadonites and glauconites in the region of OH stretching frequencies. Clay Miner. 21, 377–388.Google Scholar
Smoliar-Zviagina, B.B. (1993) Relationships between structural parameters and chemical composition of micas. Clay Miner. 28, 603–624.Google Scholar
Teo, B.K (1986) EXAFS: Basic Principles and Data Analysis, lnorg. Chem. Concepts, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Townsend, M.G., Longworth, G., Ross, C.A. & Provenchez, R. (1987) Ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic Fe III spin configurations in sheet silicates. Phys. Chem. Min. 15, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsipursky, S.I. & Drits, V.A. (1984) The distribution of octahedral cations in the 2:1 layers of diocthhedrat smectites. Clay Miner. 19, 177–193.Google Scholar
Tsipursky, S.I., Drits, V.A. & Chekin, S.S. (1978) Study of structural ordering of nontronite by oblique texture electron diffraction. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk S.S,S.R., Ser. Geol. 10, 105–193 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Tsipursky, S.I., Drits, V.A. & Plançon, A. (1985) Calculation of the intensities distribution in oblique texture electron diffraction patterns. Kristallografiya, 30, 38–44 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Zvyagin, B.B., Rabotnov, V.T., Sidorenko O,V. & Kotelnikov, D.D. (1985) Unique mica consisting of noncentrosymmetric layers. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R., Ser. Geol. 35, 121–124 (in Russian).Google Scholar