Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T21:52:55.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple subpial transection in Landau–Kleffner syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2001

Kate Irwin
Affiliation:
Newcomen Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Victoria Birch
Affiliation:
Neurology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, UK.
Janet Lees
Affiliation:
Neurology Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, UK.
Charles Polkey
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology and Neurosurgery Departments, King's College Hospital, UK.
Gonzalo Alarcon
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology and Neurosurgery Departments, King's College Hospital, UK.
Colin Binnie
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology and Neurosurgery Departments, King's College Hospital, UK.
Martin Smedley
Affiliation:
Newcomen Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Gillian Baird
Affiliation:
Newcomen Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Richard O Robinson
Affiliation:
Newcomen Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Get access

Abstract

We have considered multiple subpial transection (MST) as a treatment option for Landau–Kleffner syndrome (LKS) for the past 6 years. The effect of this technique on language and cognitive ability, behaviour, seizures, and EEG abnormalities is analysed here. Five children (4 males, 1 female; aged 5.5 to 10 years) underwent MST with sufficiently detailed pre- and postoperative data for analysis. Behaviour and seizure frequency improved dramatically after surgery in all children. Improvement in language also occurred in all children, although none improved to an age-appropriate level. All five had electrical status epilepticus in sleep (ESES) before surgery, which was eliminated by the procedure. One child has had an extension of his MST due to the recurrence of ESES and accompanying clinical deterioration with good effect. An attempt is made to set the effect of MST against the natural history of the condition. MST is an important treatment modality in LKS, although the timing of this intervention and its effect on final language outcome remains to be defined.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2001 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)