Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Origin of Moral Norms: A Moderate Nativist Account

  • Jessy Giroux (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 21 October 2011

ABSTRACT: In this paper, I distinguish between two families of theories which view moral norms as either “inputs” or “outputs.” I argue that the most plausible version of each model can ultimately be seen as the two sides of the same model, which I call Moderate Nativism. The difference between these two apparently antagonistic models is one of perspective rather than content: while the Input model explains how emotional dispositions constrain the historical evolution of moral norms, the Output model explains how these same dispositions naturally give rise to corresponding moral judgments in individuals.

RÉSUMÉ: Dans cet article, je distingue deux familles théoriques qui conçoivent les normes morales comme des «intrants» (inputs) ou des «extrants» (outputs). Je soutiens que l’on peut ultimement unifier la meilleure version de ces deux modèles en un seul modèle théorique que je nomme l’Innéisme Modéré. La différence entre ces deux modèles apparemment antagonistes en est une de perspective plutôt que de contenu : alors que le modèle des intrants analyse l’impact de dispositions émotionnelles sur l’évolution historique des normes morales, le modèle des extrants s’intéresse plutôt au rôle de ces mêmes dispositions dans le développement de jugements moraux individuels.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. Abarbanell and M. C. Hauser 2010Mayan Morality: An Exploration of Permissible Harms.” Cognition 115: 207–24.

J. Haidt and C. Joseph 2004Intuitive Ethics: How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues.” Daedalus: On Human Nature 133: 55–66.

J. Haidt and J. Graham 2007When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions That Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20 (1): 98–116.

M. D. Hauser , F. Cushman , L. Young , R. K.-X. Jin , and J. Mikhail 2006A Dissociation between Moral Judgment and Justifications.” Mind and Language 22: 1–21.

R. C. Morris 1996Anthropology in the Body Shop: Lords of the Garden, Cannibalism, and the Consuming Desires of Televisual Anthropology.” American Anthropologist 98 (1): 137–48.

S. Nichols 2004 Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.

S. H. Schwartz and W. Bilsky 1990Toward a Theory of the Universal Content and Structure of Value: Extensions and Cross-Cultural Replications.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 878–91.

D. Sperber and L. A. Hirschfeld 2004The Cognitive Foundation of Cultural Stability and Diversity.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 40–6.

K. Sterelny 2010Moral Nativism: A Skeptical Response.” Mind and Language 25 (3): 279–97.

S. Stich 2006Is Morality an Elegant Machine or a Kludge?Journal of Cognition and Culture 6 (1–2): 181– 9.

E. T Wielenberg . 2010On the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.” Ethics 120 (3): 441–64.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *