Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Une forme minimale de coopération

  • Cédric Paternotte (a1)

ABSTRACT : Definitions of cooperative action usually provide sufficient rather than necessary conditions. I here define a minimal form of cooperation, which encompasses mass actions, such as demonstrations. Intentional, epistemic, strategic and teleological aspects, mainly obtained from a weakening of pre-existing concepts, are discussed. I also emphasize the key role played by game theoretic concepts in the definition of joint action. Finally, I claim that rationality is a necessary condition of minimal cooperation, whereas classical analysis merely sees rationality as a possible or desirable characteristic.

RÉSUMÉ : La plupart des nombreuses définitions existantes d’une action coopérative en fournissent des conditions suffisantes plutôt que nécessaires. Nous définissons ici une forme minimale de coopération, correspondant aux actions de masse, telles des manifestations. Nous en détaillons les aspects intentionnel, épistémique, stratégique et téléologique, généralement obtenus par affaiblissement spécifique de concepts classiques. Parallèlement, nous soulignons le rôle crucial de concepts issus de la théorie des jeux pour la définition d’une action coopérative. Enfin, nous soutenons que la rationalité d’une action coopérative minimale est cruciale à sa réalisation et pas seulement possible ou souhaitable comme le soutiennent les analyses habituelles.

Hide All
Aumann R. et Brandenburger A. 1995 «Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium», Econometrica, vol. 63, p. 1161-1180.
Bratman M. 1992 «Shared Cooperate Activity», The Philosophical Review, vol. 101, n° 2, p. 327-341.
Brewer M. et Gardner W. 1996 «Who is this “We”? Levels of Collective Identity and Self Identication», Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 71, p. 83-93.
Camerer C. 2003 Behavioral Game Theory, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Chant S. et Ernst Z. 2007 «Group Intentions as Equilibria», Philophical Studies, vol. 133, n° 1, p. 95-109.
Chwe M.-Y. 2001 Rational Ritual. Culture, Coordination and Common Knowledge, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Cubitt R. et Sugden R. 2003 «Common Knowledge, Salience and Convention : a Reconstruction of David Lewis’ Game Theory», Economics and Philosophy, vol. 19,p. 175-210.
Dawes R. 1980 «Social Dilemmas», Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 31, p. 169-193.
Gilbert M. 1989 On Social Facts, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Gold N. et Sugden R. 2007 «Collective Intentions and Team Agency», Journal of Philosophy, vol. 104, n° 3, p. 109-137.
Kreps D. et Wilson R. 1982 «Reputation and Imperfect Information», Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 27, n° 2, p. 253-279.
Miller S. 2001 Social Action — A Teleogical Account, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Orbell J. et Dawes R. 1981 «Social Dilemmas», Stephenson G. et Davis J., dir., Progress in Applied Social Psychology, volume 1, Hoboken, John Wiley and Sons, p. 37-65.
Osborne M. et Rubinstein A. 1994 A Course in Game Theory, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Rapoport A. 1962 «Three Mode of Conflict», Management Science, vol. 7, n° 3, p. 210-218.
Regan D. 1980 Utilitarianism and Cooperation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Searle J. 1990 «Collective Intentions and Actions», Cohen P., Morgan J. et Pollack M., dir., Intentions in Communication, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
Tajfel H., Billig M., Bundy R. et Flament C. 1971 «Social Categorization in Group Behavior», European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 1, p. 149-178.
Tollefsen D. 2002 «Collective Intentionality and the Social Sciences», Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 32, n° 1, p. 25-50.
Tuomela R. 2000 Cooperation — A Philosophical Study, Mechelen, Kluwer.
Tuomela R. 2007 The Philosophy of Sociality — The Shared Point of View, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Tuomela R. et Miller S. 1988 «We-Intentions», Philosophical Studies, vol. 53, p. 367-389.
Walliser B. 2002 «Les justifications des notions d’équilibre de jeux», Revue d’économie politique, vol. 112, n° 5, p. 695-716.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 80 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.