Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T03:58:18.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European Co-production Funds and Latin American Cinema: Processes of Othering and Bourgeois Cinephilia in Claudia Llosa's La teta asustada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Deborah Shaw*
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth, UK
*
Deborah Shaw, University of Portsmouth, Eldon Building, Winston Churchill Avenue, Portsmouth PO1 2DJ, UK. Email: deborah.shaw@port.ac.uk

Abstract

Latin American women's filmmaking has an unprecedented international profile thanks to the films of the Peruvian director Claudia Llosa, and the Argentine directors Lucía Puenzo and Lucrecia Martel. What is frequently unacknowledged when discussing the work of these award-winning filmmakers is the fact that all of their films are co-productions with Europe, and that programmes such as Cinéfondation, a programme aligned with the Cannes film festival, the Hubert Bals Fund, the World Cinema Fund and Ibermedia have been instrumental in their production. This article will tell this story through a discussion of the work of Claudia Llosa with an introduction to the issues raised by her award winning festival film Madeinusa (2006), and a focus on La teta asustada/The Milk of Sorrow (2009). It will consider the arguments of theorists who critique what they see as neo-colonial European interventions in ‘world cinema’, and those who celebrate the enabling work of the funding bodies. The chapter asks where can we place the cultural production of Llosa within these paradigms? Does the film confirm the critical positions by being subject to a process of othering for a European cinephile festival audience? Does it create its protagonist Fausta, an Andean migrant to Lima, from racist, neo-colonial stereotypes as some critics claim? Or, does it raise important questions relating to class and ethnic divisions within contemporary Peruvian society? The article ends with a discussion of how Llosa's second film, that presents the urban poor and the colonial class from a bourgeois point of view, compares with the films of Lucrecia Martel and Lucía Puenzo which provide a bourgeois point of view on the bourgeoisie itself.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldazábal, C (2004) Desdomesticar la percepción: Entrevista a Lucrecia Martel, revistateína, 6; http://www.revistateina.es/teina/web/teina6/cine4.htm.Google Scholar
Barrow, S (2013) New configurations for Peruvian cinema: The rising star of Claudia Llosa, Transnational Cinemas, 4(2): 197215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beteta, JJ (2009) La teta asustada de Claudia Llosa, Cine Encuentro, March 17, http://www.cinencuentro.com/2009/03/17/la-teta-asustada-de-claudia-llosa-parte-i/Google Scholar
D’Argenio, MC (2013) A contemporary Andean type: The representation of the indigenous world in Claudia Llosa's films, Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 8(1): 523.Google Scholar
Dennison, S, Lim, SH (2006) Identity, culture and politics in film: World cinema as a theoretical problem In: S Dennison and SH Lim (eds) Remapping World Cinema: Identity, Culture and Politics in Film. London: Wallflower Press, pp. 115.Google Scholar
Elsaesser, T (2005) European Cinema: Face to Face with Hollywood. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Falicov, T (2013) Cine en construcción (Films in progress): How Spanish and Latin American filmmakers negotiate the construction of a globalized art house aesthetic, Transnational Cinemas, 4(2): 253271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Y (2015) Guises of transnationalism in Israel/Palestine: A few notes on 5 Broken Cameras, Transnational Cinemas, 6(2).Google Scholar
Göktürk, D (2002) Anyone at home? Itinerant identities in European cinema of the 1990s, Framework, 43(2): 201212.Google Scholar
Grant, C, Kuhn, A (2006) Screening World Cinema: A Screen Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halle, R (2010) Offering tales they want to hear: Transnational European film funding as neo-Orientalism. In: Galt, R, Schoonover, K (eds) Global Art Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 303319.Google Scholar
Middents, J (2013) The first rule of Latin American cinema is you do not talk about Latin American cinema: Notes on discussing a sense of place in contemporary cinéma, Transnational Cinemas, 4(2): 147164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagib, L (2006) Towards a positive definition of world cinema. In: Dennison, S, Lim, SH (eds) Remapping World Cinema. London: Wallflower Press, pp. 3037.Google Scholar
Ostrowska, D (2010) International film festivals as producers of world cinema, Cinéma & Cie, 10(14–15): 145150.Google Scholar
Palaversich, D (2013) Cultural dyslexia and the politics of cross-cultural excursion in Claudia Llosa's Madeinusa, Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 90(4): 489503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M (2011) The film festival as producer: Latin American films and Rotterdam's Hubert Bals Fund, Screen, 52(2): 261267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D (2011a) (Trans)National images and cinematic spaces: The cases of Alfonso Cuarón's Y tu mamá también (2001) and Carlos ReygadasJapón (2002), Iberoamericana, 44: 117131.Google Scholar
Shaw, D (2011b) Babel and the global Hollywood gaze, Situations: Project of the Radical Imagination, 4(1): 1131.Google Scholar
Shaw, D (2013) Sex, texts and money, funding and Latin American queer cinema: The cases of Martel's La niña santa and Puenzo's XXY, Transnational Cinemas, 4(2): 165184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theidon, K (2004) Entre Prójimos: El conflicto armado interno y la política de la reconciliación en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Ugaz, P (2009) Es un sueño para cualquier investigador que tu trabajo motive a los demás, Terra Perú, Mar 3, http://www.terra.com.pe/noticias/articulo/html/act1659267.htm.Google Scholar
Van Hoeij, B (2009) Review ‘The Milk of Sorrow’, Variety, February 14, http://variety.com/2009/film/reviews/the-milk-of-sorrow-1200473657.Google Scholar