Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T12:56:14.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis as a Stage in the History of Mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Extract

A multiplicity of circumstances - including geographic and political isolation, and differences of social organization and customs - has led different groups of people to develop mathematical knowledge independently of each other. Yet history has shown us again and again that by some necessity these separate groups often encounter the same problems. The solutions they propose, however, are often different. This suggests a series of questions. First of all: what is the relationship between the solutions? Is one solution an alternative to the other, and if so, how to account for their differences? Or, on the contrary, are the solutions complementary? Both of these configurations can be found in the history of mathematics: in the following article we will investigate two elementary examples of these phenomena and trace the historical circumstances under which different solutions have come into contact.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie / International Federation of Philosophical Societies (FISP)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benoit, Paul; Chemla, Karine; Ritter, Jim (eds.) Histoire de fractions, fractions d'histoire, Bâle, Birkhäuser, 1992.Google Scholar
Chemla, Karine, “Theoretical Aspects of the Chinese Algorithmic Tradition,” in Historia Scientiarum, 42, 1991, pp. 7598.Google Scholar
Chemla, KarineSimilarities between Chinese and Arabic Mathematical Writings, I: Root Extraction.” Preprint du séminaire d'histoire des sciences de l'Aniquité à l'Age classique (in press).Google Scholar
Knorr, Wilbur, “Techniques of Fractions in Ancient Egypt and Greece,” Historia Mathematica, 9, 1982, pp. 133–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi, “L'extraction de la racine nième et l'invention des fractionsGoogle Scholar
décimales (XI-XIIe siècle),” Archive for History of the Exact Sciences, 18, no. 3,1978, pp. 191243, reprinted in Rashed, R., 1984a, pp. 93–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, R.L'idée de l'algèbre selon al-Khwarizmi,” Fundementa Scientiae, 4, no. 1, 1983, pp. 87100, reprinted in Rashed, R. 1984a, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
Rashed, R. Entre arithmétique et algèbre. Recherches sur l'histoire des mathématiques arabes, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1984a.Google Scholar
Rashed, R. Diophante. Les Arithmétiques, (Books in Arabic: t. III: 1. IV: t. IV: I. V, VI, VII), Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1984b.Google Scholar
Smith, David Eugene, History of Mathematics, first edition, vol. I, 1923; vol. II, 1925. Second edition, vol. I, 1951; vol. II, 1953. Reimpression of the second edition in 1958. New York, Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, François, Textes mathématiques babyloniens, Leyde, Brill, 1938.Google Scholar
Ver Eecke, Pierre, Diophante d'Alexandrie. Les six livres arithmétiques et le livre des nombres polygones. Paris, Librairie Albert Blanchard, 1959.Google Scholar