Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-hcslb Total loading time: 0.537 Render date: 2023-02-01T03:06:48.881Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Impact on Hospital Functions Following the 2010 Chilean Earthquake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the 2010 Chilean earthquake on hospital functions and services. Hospitals functioning in a post-disaster environment must provide emergency medical care related to the event, in addition to providing standard community health services. This study focused on damage to both structural and nonstructural components, as well as to utility services.

Methods: Site visits were made to every hospital in a single province (Bio-Bio). Engineers conducted damage assessments while interviews of hospital administrators were conducted. The survey was requested by the Chilean Ministry of Health (MOH) to assess the impact of the earthquake on hospital operations and facility responses to those effects. Other important regional and hospital data were gathered from hospital administrators and the MOH.

Results: Seven government hospitals were surveyed. All hospitals in the region lost communications, municipal electrical power and water for several days. All reported some physical damage although only one suffered significant structural damage. All lost some functional capacity as a result of the earthquake. The loss of telephones and cellular service was identified as the most difficult problem by administrators. An average of 3 physical areas per hospital lost some degree of functional capacity following the earthquake.

Conclusion: Even in an earthquake-prone and very well-prepared country such as Chile hospital functions were widely disrupted by the event. The loss of hospital functions can occur even with minimal damage to the physical structure. The loss of communications can impede or halt response efforts at all levels. Hospitals should be prepared to self-sustain following a disaster for 2-3 days regardless of the level of structural damage. Understanding the details of these impacts is essential to hospital preparedness and plans for continuing services after a disaster.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2010;4:122-128)

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 577: Design Guide for Improving Hospital Safety in Earthquakes, Floods, and High Winds. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Risk Management Series. Washington, DC: FEMA; 2007.Google Scholar
2.Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Safe Hospitals: A Regional Initiative on Disaster-Resilient Health Facilities. 27th Pan American Sanitary Conference, Washington, DC, October 1–5, 2007. http://new.paho.org/disasters/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=371&Itemid=. Accessed May 12, 2010.Google Scholar
3.Albanese, J, Birnbaum, M, Cannon, C.Fostering disaster resilient communities across the globe through the incorporation of safe and resilient hospitals for community-integrated disaster responses. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23 (5):385390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.International Strategy for Disaster Reduction: Hyogo Framework for Action: 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities for Disasters. World Conference on Disaster Reduction. 2005. Hyogo, Kobe, Japan. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/hfa/hfa.htm. Accessed May 12, 2010.Google Scholar
5.Pan American Health Organization, Regional Office of the World Health Organization. Area on Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Relief. Annual Report 2005. http://www.disaster-info.net/AnnualReport05/index.htm. Accessed May 19, 2010.Google Scholar
6.Government of Haiti. Haiti Earthquake PDNA: Assessment of Damage, Losses, General and Sectoral Needs (Annex to the Action Plan for National Recovery and Development of Haiti). http://www2.reliefweb.int/rw/RWFiles2010.nsf/FilesByRWDocUnidFilename/SMAR-84H3RA-full_report.pdf/$File/full_report.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2010.Google Scholar
7.WHO Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Humanitarian Health Cluster. Pakistan Earthquake October 2005, Consolidated Health Situation Bulletin #2. http://www.who.int/hac/crises/international/pakistan_earthquake/HealthClusterBulletinSouthAsiaEarthquake5.pdf. Published October 27, 2005. Accessed May 12, 2010.Google Scholar
8.United Nations Children's Fund. Crisis Appeal. Earthquake in Bam, Iran. http://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/Emergencies_Iran_Flash_Appeal_130104.pdf. Published January 13, 2004. Accessed April 16, 2010.Google Scholar
9.Chapin, E, Daniels, A, Elias, R, Aspilcueta, D, Doocy, S.Impact of the 2007 Ica earthquake on health facilities and health service provision in southern Peru. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24 (4):326332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.United States Geological Survey. Largest Earthquakes in the World Since 1900. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/10_largest_world.php. Accessed April 22, 2010.Google Scholar
11.Fuentes, FElaboran primer mapa de víctimas del terremoto y tsunami por localidades. La Tercera. April 17, 2010:33-34.Google Scholar
12.Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Chile Country Health Profile. http://www.paho.org/english/sha/prflchi.htm. Accessed April 26, 2010.Google Scholar
13.Hick, JL, Barbera, JA, Kelen, GD.Refining surge capacity: conventional, contingency, and crisis capacity. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3 2(Suppl)S59S67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Yamauchi, K, Mizuno, S, Xu, Z.Disaster-readiness of medical facilities in Aichi Prefecture. Nagoya J Med Sci. 1996;59 (3-4):121128.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile. Terremoto en Chile, Situacion de la Infraestructura Habitacional y Hospitalaria. http://siit2.bcn.cl/actualidad-territorial/terremoto_chile-infraestructura_hospitalaria. Accessed April 22, 2010.Google Scholar
16.Durkin, ME, Thiel, CC, Schnieder, JE, De Vriend, T.Injuries and emergency medical response in the Loma Prieta earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am. 1991;81:21432166.Google Scholar
17.Pointer, JE, Michaelis, J, Saunders, C.. The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: impact on hospital patient care. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21 (10):12281233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Ukai, T.The Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake and the problems with emergency medical care. Ren Fail. 1997;19 (5):633645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Tanaka, H, Iwai, A, Oda, J.Overview of evacuation and transport of patients following the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. J Emerg Med. 1998;16 (3):439444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Chan, YF, Alagappan, K, Gandhi, A, Donovan, C, Tewari, M, Zaets, SB. Disaster management following the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(3):196202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Doocy, S, Daniels, A, Aspilcueta, D; Inppares-JHSPH-CUNY Study Team. Mortality and injury following the 2007 Ica earthquake in Peru. Am J Disaster Med. 2009;4(1):1522.Google Scholar
22.Klein, KR, Rosenthal, MS, Klausner, HA.Blackout 2003: preparedness and lessons learned from the perspectives of four hospitals. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20 (5):343349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Paul, JA, Lin, LImpact of facility damages on hospital capacities for decision support in disaster response planning for an earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24 (4):333341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Mitrani-Reiser, J, Beck, JLIncorporating Losses Due to Repair Costs, Downtime and Fatalities in Probabilistic-Based Earthquake Engineering.Proceedings of Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece, June 13-15, 2007.Google Scholar
25.Rodriguez, H, Aguirre, BE.Hurricane Katrina and the healthcare infrastructure: a focus on disaster preparedness, response, and resiliency. Front Health Serv Manage. 2005;23:1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Impact on Hospital Functions Following the 2010 Chilean Earthquake
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Impact on Hospital Functions Following the 2010 Chilean Earthquake
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Impact on Hospital Functions Following the 2010 Chilean Earthquake
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *