Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T13:13:38.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Emergency Preparedness of Households in Israel for War—Current Status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Moran Bodas ,
Maya Siman-Tov ,
Shulamith Kreitler  and
Kobi Peleg
Moran Bodas*
Affiliation:
Department of Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Israel
Maya Siman-Tov
Affiliation:
Israel National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Israel
Shulamith Kreitler
Affiliation:
School of Psychological Sciences, Gordon Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Israel Psychoncology Research Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Kobi Peleg
Affiliation:
Department of Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Israel Israel National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Israel
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Moran Bodas, MPH, Department of Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, PO Box 39040, 69978, Tel-Aviv, Israel (e-mail: moranbod@post.tau.ac.il).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

In recent decades, many efforts have been made, both globally and locally, to enhance household preparedness for emergencies. In the State of Israel in particular, substantial investment has been made throughout the years in preparing the population for one of the major threats to the civilian population—a rapidly deteriorating regional conflict that involves high-trajectory weapons (ie, rocket and missile fire) launched at the home front. The purpose of this study was to examine the current preparedness level of the Israeli public for this threat and determine the correlates of such preparedness with known factors.

Methods

A telephone-based, random sampling of 503 households representative of the Israeli population was carried out during October 2013. The questionnaire examined the level of household preparedness as well as attitudes towards threat perception, responsibility, willingness to search for information, and sense of preparedness. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the level of preparedness in the general population and to find correlates to this preparedness in attitudes and demographic variables.

Results

More than half of the sample reported complying with 50% or fewer of the actions recommended by the Israeli Home Front Command. Having an increased sense of preparedness and willingness to search for related information were positively correlated with actual household preparedness, and the latter was also found to be the most predictive variable of household preparedness.

Conclusions

Although the overall household preparedness reported is mediocre, the level of preparedness found in this study suggests better preparedness of the population in Israel for its primary threat. The findings suggest that in order to promote preparedness of the Israeli public for war, emphasis should be put on increasing the public demand for information and encouraging people to evaluate their sense of preparedness. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2015;9:382–390)

Keywords

emergencyhousehold preparednesswarIsraelresilience
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 382 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Strategic framework 2025—work program 2012–2015. UNISDR website. http://www.unisdr.org/files/23291_1101657inteng.pdf. Published October 2011. Accessed December 4, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Peek, LA, Mileti, DS. The history of disaster research. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A, eds. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2002:511-524.Google Scholar
3. Hemond, Y, Robert, B. Preparedness: the state of the art and future prospects. Disaster Prev Manag. 2012;21(4):404-417.Google Scholar
4. Trost, J, Hultaker, O. Introduction—family and disaster (special issue). Int J Mass Emerg Disaster. 1983;1:7-18.Google Scholar
5. Drabek, TE. Human Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1986.Google Scholar
6. Wiest, RE. A comparative perspective on household, gender, and kinship in relation to anger. In: Enarson E, Morrow BH, eds. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through the Eyes of Women. Westport, CT: Praeger Press; 1998.Google Scholar
7. Kirschenbaum, A. The mother hen effect. In: Kirschenbaum A, ed. Chaos Organization and Disaster Management. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 2003:177-213.Google Scholar
8. Coffman, S. Parents’ struggle to rebuild family life after Hurricane Andrew. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1996;17:353-367.Google Scholar
9. Patterson, JM. Integrating family resilience and family stress theory. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64:349-360.Google Scholar
10. Gerrity, ET, Steinglass, P. Relocation stress following catastrophic events. In: Ursano RJ, ed. Terrorism and Disaster: Individual and Community Mental Health Interventions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2003:259-286.Google Scholar
11. Miller, L. Family therapy of terroristic trauma: psychological syndromes and treatment strategies. Am J Fam Ther. 2003;31:257-280.Google Scholar
12. Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav. 2000;32(4):461-501.Google Scholar
13. Rincon, E, Linares, MYR, Greenberg, B. Effect of previous experience of a hurricane on preparedness for future hurricanes. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19:276-279.Google Scholar
14. Lindell, MK, Prater, CS. Risk area residents’ perception and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(11):2377-2392.Google Scholar
15. Eisenman, DP, Wold, C, Fielding, J, et al. Differences in individual-level terrorism preparedness in Los Angeles County. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(1):1-6.Google Scholar
16. Blessman, J, Skupski, J, Jamil, M, et al. Barriers to at-home-preparedness in public health employees: implications for disaster preparedness training. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(3):318-326.Google Scholar
17. Diekman, ST, Kearney, SP, O’Neil, ME, et al. Qualitative study of homeowners’ emergency preparedness: experiences, perceptions, and practices. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2007;22(6):494-501.Google Scholar
18. Lemyre, L, Lee, JEC, Turner, MC, et al. Terrorism preparedness in Canada: a public survey on perceived institutional and individual response to terrorism. Int J Emerg Manag. 2007;4(2):296-315.Google Scholar
19. Kapucu, N. Culture of preparedness: household disaster preparedness. Disaster Prev Manag. 2008;17(4):526-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Page, L, Rubin, J, Amlôt, R, et al. Are Londoners prepared for an emergency? A longitudinal study following the London bombings. Biosecur Bioterror. 2008;6(4):309-319.Google Scholar
21. Uscher-Pines, L, Hausman, AJ, Powell, S, et al. Disaster preparedness of households with special needs in southeastern Pennsylvania. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(3):227-230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Ablah, E, Konda, K, Kelley, CL. Factors predicting individual emergency preparedness: a multi-state analysis of 2006 BRFSS data. Biosecur Bioterror. 2009;7(3):317-330.Google Scholar
23. Paton, D. Disaster preparedness: a social-cognitive perspective. Disaster Prev Manag. 2003;12(3):210-216.Google Scholar
24. Turner, RH, Nigg, JM, Paz, D. Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Burns, R, Sullivan, P. Perceptions of danger, risk taking, and outcomes in a remote community. Environ Behav. 2000;32(1):32-71.Google Scholar
26. Kirschenbaum, A. Preparing for the inevitable: environmental risk perceptions and disaster preparedness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2005;23(2):97-127.Google Scholar
27. Lindell, MK, Hwang, SN. Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal. 2008;28(2):539-556.Google Scholar
28. Miceli, R, Sotgiu, I, Settanni, M. Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: a study in an alpine valley in Italy. J Environ Psychol. 2008;28:164-173.Google Scholar
29. McGee, TK, McFarlane, BL, Varghese, J. An examination of the influence of hazard experience on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Soc Nat Resour. 2009;22(4):308-323.Google Scholar
30. Eriksen, C, Gill, N. Bushfire and everyday life: examining the awareness action “gap” in changing rural landscapes. Geoforum. 2010;41(5):814-825.Google Scholar
31. Lopez-Marrero, T, Tschakert, P. From theory to practice: building more resilient communities in flood-prone areas. Environ Urban. 2011;23(1):229-249.Google Scholar
32. Kunreuther, H. Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1978.Google Scholar
33. Garcia, EM. Earthquake preparedness in California: a survey of Irvine residents. Urban Resour. 1989;5:15-19.Google Scholar
34. Mulilis, JP, Duval, TS. Negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a person-relative-to-event pre model of coping with threat. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1995;25:1319-1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Russell, L, Goltz, JD, Bourque, LB. Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environ Behav. 1995;27:744-770.Google Scholar
36. Lindell, MK, Whitney, DJ. Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption. Risk Anal. 2000;20(1):13-26.Google Scholar
37. McEntire, DA, Myers, A. Preparing communities for disasters: issues and processes for government readiness. Disaster Prev Manag. 2004;13(2):140-152.Google Scholar
38. Paek, HJ, Hilyard, K, Freimuth, V, et al. Theory-based approaches to understanding public emergency preparedness: implications for effective health and risk communication. J Health Commun. 2010;15:428-444.Google Scholar
39. Duval, TS, Mulilis, JP. A person-relative-to-event (PrE) approach to negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a field study. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;29(3):495-516.Google Scholar
40. Ballantyne, M. Information on Volcanic and Earthquake Hazards: The Impact on Awareness and Preparation. Wellington, New Zealand: Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences; 2000.Google Scholar
41. Paton, D, Smith, LM, Johnston, D. Volcanic hazards: risk perception and preparedness. NZ J Psychol. 2000;29(2):86-91.Google Scholar
42. Perry, RW, Lindell, MK. Volcanic risk perception and adjustment in a multi-hazard environment. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2008;172(3):170-178.Google Scholar
43. Jackson, EL, Mukerjee, T. Human adjustment to the earthquake hazard of San Francisco, California. In: White GF, ed. Natural Hazards: Local, National and Global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1974:160-166.Google Scholar
44. Davis, MS. Living along the fault line: an update on earthquake awareness and preparedness in Southern California. Urban Resour. 1989;5:8-14.Google Scholar
45. Mileti, DS, Fitzpatrick, C. The causal sequence of risk communication in the Parkfield earthquake prediction experiment. Risk Anal. 1992;12:393-400.Google Scholar
46. Mileti, DS, Darlington, JD. The role of searching in shaping reactions to earthquake risk information. Soc Probl. 1997;44:89-103.Google Scholar
47. Bishop, B, Paton, D, Syme, G, Nancarrow, B. Coping with environmental degradation: salination as a community stressor. Network. 2000;12:1-15.Google Scholar
48. Kirschenbaum, A. Generic sources of disaster communities: a social network approach. Int J Sociol Soc Policy. 2004;24(10/11):94-129.Google Scholar
49. Heller, K, Alexander, DB, Gatz, M, et al. Social and personal factors as predictors of earthquake preparation: the role of support provision, network discussion, negative affect, age, and education. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2005;35(2):399-422.Google Scholar
50. Mathbor, GM. Enhancement of community preparedness for natural disasters: the role of social work in building social capital for sustainable disaster relief and management. Int Soc Work. 2007;50(3):357-369.Google Scholar
51. Mimaki, J, Shaw, R. Enhancement of disaster preparedness with social capital and community capacity: a perspective from a comparative case study of rural communities in Kochi, Japan. SUISUI Hydrol Res Lett. 2007;1:5-10.Google Scholar
52. Koh, HK, Cadigan, RO. Disaster preparedness and social capital. In: Kawachi I, Subramaniam SV, Kim D, eds. Social Capital and Health. New York, NY: Springer; 2008:273-285.Google Scholar
53. Bihari, M, Ryan, R. Influence of social capital on community preparedness for wildfires. Landsc Urban Plan. 2012;106:253-261.Google Scholar
54. Dooley, D, Catalano, R, Mishra, S, et al. Earthquake preparedness: predictors in a community survey. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1992;22:451-470.Google Scholar
55. Edwards, ML. Social location and self-protective behavior: implications for earthquake preparedness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1993;11:293-304.Google Scholar
56. Fothergill, A. Gender, risk, and disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1996;14(1):33-56.Google Scholar
57. Kirschenbaum, A. Families and disaster behavior: a reassessment of family preparedness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2006;24:111-143.Google Scholar
58. Soffer, Y, Goldberg, A, Adini, B, et al. The relationship between demographic/educational parameters and perceptions, knowledge and earthquake mitigation in Israel. Disasters. 2011;35(1):36-44.Google Scholar
59. Kirschenbaum, A. Disaster preparedness: a conceptual and empirical reevaluation. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2002;20(1):5-28.Google Scholar
60. Johnson, T, Owens, L. Survey response rate reporting in the professional literature. Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Nashville, TN; 2003. Available at: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2003/Files/JSM2003-000638.pdf.Google Scholar
61. Kulas, JT, Stachowski, AA, Haynes, BA. Middle response functioning in Likert-responses to personality items. J Bus Psychol. 2008;22(3):251-259.Google Scholar
62. Statistics of the Israeli Population Central Bureau of Statistics website [in Hebrew]. http://www.cbs.gov.il/. Accessed December 15, 2013.Google Scholar
63. Paton, D, McClure, J, Bürgelt, PT. Natural hazard resilience: the role of individual and household preparedness. In: Paton D, Moore M, Johnston D, eds. Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 2006:105-127.Google Scholar
64. Redlener, I, Abramson, D, Stehling-Ariza, T, et al. The American preparedness project: where the US public stands in 2007 on terrorism, security, and disaster preparedness. Columbia University website. http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/catalog/ac:126170. Published 2007. Accessed July 21, 2012.Google Scholar