Skip to main content
×
×
Home

THE DIVERSITY OF INTEGRATION IN A MULTIETHNIC METROPOLIS: Exploring What Whites, African Americans, and Latinos Imagine

  • Maria Krysan (a1), Courtney Carter (a2) and Marieke van Londen (a3)
Abstract

Although there is little debate that Census data reveal declines in standard measures of segregation over the past several decades, depending on who you ask, racial residential segregation is either just about gone or is stubbornly persistent. In this study, we draw attention to how the murkiness in the conceptualization of what has replaced ‘segregation’ and the related question of what integration is, contributes to this disagreement. Through an analysis of attitudes toward racially integrated neighborhoods, we demonstrate the pitfalls of our lack of consistency and clarity about the conceptual and operational definition of integration. Our analysis reveals the diversity of attitudes toward integrated communities—depending on who is asked, and what kind of integration is considered—and points to a fragility of commitment to the ideals of integration. We do this by using an innovative survey dataset that includes both open and closed-ended questions asked of a large probability sample of Whites, African Americans, and Latinos living in the Chicago metropolitan area. The survey asked individuals to describe their ideal neighborhood racial/ethnic composition and explain why it was ideal; they were then asked to describe (and explain) their least desired neighborhood racial/ethnic composition. Juxtaposing the results, we reveal that integration is both enthusiastically endorsed and much maligned—even within the same person—and that whether it is good or bad very much depends on the type of integration. We argue that appreciating the diversity of integration attitudes is critical if we are to develop a more nuanced understanding of future patterns of residential stratification in our increasingly diverse nation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      THE DIVERSITY OF INTEGRATION IN A MULTIETHNIC METROPOLIS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      THE DIVERSITY OF INTEGRATION IN A MULTIETHNIC METROPOLIS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      THE DIVERSITY OF INTEGRATION IN A MULTIETHNIC METROPOLIS
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Maria Krysan, Department of Sociology (m/c 312), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL 60607. E-mail: Krysan@uic.edu.
References
Hide All
Adelman, Robert M. (2005). The Roles of Race, Class, and Residential Preferences in the Neighborhood Racial Composition of Middle-Class Blacks and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1): 209228.
Alba, Richard, and Romalewski, Steven (2012). The End of Segregation? Hardly. A More Nuanced View from the New York Metropolitan Region. Report published by the Center for Urban Research at the Graduate Center at CUNY. New York. <http://www.gc.cuny.edu/Page-Elements/Academics-Research-Centers-Initiatives/Centers-and-Institutes/Center-for-Urban-Research/CUR-research-initiatives/The-End-of-Segregation-Hardly> (accessed October 14, 2016).
Allport, Gordon (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Andersen, Margaret (1999). Diversity without Oppression: Race, Ethnicity, Identity and Power. In Kenyatta, M. and Totowa, R. Tai. (Eds.) Critical Ethnicity: Countering the Waves of Identity Politics, pp. 520. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bell, Joyce M., and Hartmann, Douglas (2007). Diversity in Everyday Discourse: The Cultural Ambiguities and Consequences of ‘Happy Talk.’ American Sociological Review, 72: 895914.
Berrey, Ellen C. (2005). Divided over Diversity: Political Discourse in a Chicago Neighborhood. City and Community, 4(2): 143170.
Blalock, Hubert M Jr.. (1967). Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Capricorn Books.
Blumer, Herbert (1958). Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1): 37.
Bobo, Lawrence D., and Hutchings, Vincent L. (1996). Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context. American Sociological Review, 61(6): 951972.
Bobo, Lawrence D., and Zubrinsky, Camille (1996). Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere in-Group Preference or Racial Prejudice?” Social Forces, 74(3): 883909.
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, Forman, Tyrone A., Lewis, Amanda E., and Embrick, David G. (2003). “It Wasn’t Me!” How will Race and Racism Work in 21st Century America. Research in Political Sociology, 12: 111134.
Bradburn, Norman, Sudman, Seymour, and Gockel, Galen L. (1970). Racial Integration in American Neighborhoods. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
Burke, Meghan A. (2012). Racial Ambivalence in Diverse Communities: Whiteness and the Power of Color-Blind Ideologies . Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Charles, Camille Z. (2003). The Dynamics of Residential Segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 167207.
Charles, Camille Z. (2006). Won’t You Be My Neighbor: Race, Class, and Residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Clark, William A. V. (1986). Residential Segregation in American Cities: A Review and Interpretation. Population Research and Policy Review, 5(2): 95127.
Clark, William A. V. (1988). Understanding Residential Segregation in American Cities: Interpreting the Evidence. Population Research and Policy Review, 7(2): 113121.
Clark, William A. V. (1989). Residential Segregation in American Cities: Common Ground and Differences in Interpretation. Population Research and Policy Review, 8(2): 193197.
Downey, Dennis J. (1999). From Americanization to Multiculturalism: Political Symbols and Struggles for Cultural Diversity in Twentieth Century American Race Relations. Sociological Perspectives, 42(2): 249278.
Ellen, Ingrid Gould (2000). Sharing America’s Neighborhoods: The Prospects for Stable Racial Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Emerson, Michael O., Chai, Karen J., and Yancey, George (2001). Does Race Matter in Residential Segregation? Exploring the Preferences of White Americans. American Sociological Review, 66(6): 922935.
Farley, Reynolds, Schuman, Howard, Bianchi, Suzanne, Colasanto, Diane, and Hatchett, Shirley (1978). “Chocolate City, Vanilla Suburbs”: Will the Trend Toward Racially Separate Communities Continue? Social Science Research, 7(4): 319344.
Farley, Reynolds, Steeh, Charlotte, Krysan, Maria, Reeves, Keith, and Jackson, Tara (1994). Stereotypes and Segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit Area. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3): 750778.
Farley, Reynolds (2011). The Waning of American Apartheid? Contexts, 10(3): 3842.
Friedman, Samantha (2008). Do Declines in Residential Segregation Mean Stable Neighborhood Racial Integration in Metropolitan America? A Research Note. Social Science Research, 37(3): 920933.
Gallagher, Charles A. (2003). Color-Blind Privilege: The Social and Political Functions of Erasing the Color Line in Post Race America. Race, Gender, and Class, 10(4): 117.
Glaeser, Edward, and Vigdor, Jacob (2012). The End of the Segregated Century: Racial Separation in America’s Neighborhoods, 1890–2010. Civic Report Number 66 . New York: The Manhattan Institute.
Glazer, Nathan (1997). We Are All Multiculturalists Now. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Iceland, John (2009). Where We Live Now: Immigration and Race in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Krysan, Maria, and Farley, Reynolds (2002). The Residential Preferences of Blacks: Do they Explain Persistent Segregation? Social Forces, 80(2): 937980.
Krysan, Maria, Couper, Mick P., Farley, Reynolds, and Forman, Tyrone (2009). Does Race Matter in Neighborhood Preferences? Results from a Video Experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2): 527559.
Krysan, Maria, and Bader, Michael D. M. (2009). Racial Blind Spots: Black-White-Latino Differences in Community Knowledge. Social Problems, 56(4): 677701.
Lee, Barrett A., and Wood, Peter B. (1990). The Fate of Residential Integration in American Cities: Evidence from Racially Mixed Neighborhoods, 1970–1980. Journal of Urban Affairs, 12: 425436.
Lee, Barrett A., and Wood, Peter B. (1991). Is Neighborhood Racial Succession Place-Specific? Demography, 28: 2140.
Lee, Barrett, Iceland, John, and Sharp, Gregory (2012). Racial and Ethnic Diversity Goes Local: Charting Change in American Communities Over Three Decades. US2010 Project Report Series. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. <http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010/Data/Report/report08292012.pdf> (accessed October 14, 2016).
Lewis, Valerie A., Emerson, Michael O., and Klineberg, Stephen (2011). Residential Segregation and Neighborhood Racial Composition Preferences of whites, blacks, and Latinos. Social Forces, 89(4): 13861407.
Loewen, James W. (2005). Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism. New York: New Press.
Logan, John R., and Stults, Brian (2011). The Persistence of Segregation in the Metropolis: New Findings from the 2010 Census. Census Brief prepared for Project US2010. <http://www.s4.brown.edu/us201> (accessed October 14, 2016).
Maly, Michael T. (2005). Beyond Segregation: Multiracial and Multiethnic Neighborhoods in the United States. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Massey, Douglas S., and Denton, Nancy A. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meyer, Stephen Grant (2000). As Long as They Don’t Move Next Door: Segregation and Neighborhood Conflict in American Neighborhoods. Lanham, MD: Lowman and Littlefield.
Norušis, Marija (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics 17 Statistical Procedures Companion . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Publishing.
Peterson, Ruth D., and Krivo, Lauren J. (2010). Divergent Social Worlds: Neighborhood Crime and the Racial-Spatial Divide. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Quillian, Lincoln (2002). Why is Black-White Residential Segregation So Persistent?: Evidence on Three Theories from Migration Data. Social Science Research, 31(2): 197229.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1971). Dynamic Models of Segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 143186.
Sin, Ray, and Krysan, Maria (2015). What is Racial Residential Integration? A Research Synthesis, 1950–2013. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(4): 467474.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
  • ISSN: 1742-058X
  • EISSN: 1742-0598
  • URL: /core/journals/du-bois-review-social-science-research-on-race
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords