Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:17:42.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REPRESENTING BLACK INTERESTS AND PROMOTING BLACK CULTURE: The Importance of African American Descriptive Representation in the U.S. House

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Andy Baker  and
Corey Cook
Andy Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Northeastern University
Corey Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of San Francisco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite considerable examination, scholars have yet to definitively establish the relationship between a legislator's racial background and his or her legislative activities. We assess the relationship between descriptive and substantive representation by discerning whether Black members of the U.S. House are more likely to promote group interests in their varied capacities as elected officials than are similarly positioned non-Black legislators. Our empirical tests utilize the most appropriate econometric models and techniques to analyze data from four Congresses spanning two distinctive districting regimes and incorporating several elements of representational behaviors. The findings are clear: Black members represent group interests more vociferously than non-Black members, including liberal non-Black Democrats from similar districts. Moreover, because Black members do not receive electoral benefits for engaging in such behavior, these legislators have policy-based motivation for representing Black interests. These results have profound practical implications for minority political representation and the future of identity politics.

Keywords

Identity PoliticsDescriptive and Substantive RepresentationBlack Interests
Type
STATE OF THE ART
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , September 2005 , pp. 227 - 246
Copyright
© 2005 W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank David Canon, Charles Franklin, Christine Leveaux, and Richard Merelman for helpful comments on previous drafts.

References

REFERENCES

Adolph, Christopher, and Gary King, with Michael C. Herron and Kenneth W. Shotts (2003). A Consensus on Second Stage Analyses in Ecological Inference Models. Political Analysis, 11: 86–94.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter and Morton Baratz (1963). Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework. American Political Science Review, 57: 632–642.Google Scholar
Bishin, Benjamin G. (2000). Constituency Influence in Congress: Does Subconstituency Matter? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25: 389–415.Google Scholar
Bodnar, John (1992). Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bratton, Kathleen A. and Kerry L. Haynie (1999). Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race. Journal of Politics, 61: 658–679.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Jack Citrin, and Cara Wong (2000). Ethnic Context, Race Relations, and California Politics. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, David W. Brady, and John F. Cogan (2002). Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting. American Political Science Review, 96(1): 127–140.Google Scholar
Canon, David T. (1999). Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Clayton, Dewey (1999). Black Congressional Representation in the South: Making the Case for Majority Black Districts. The Black Scholar, 28: 36–46.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Mathew McCubbins (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dawson, Michael (1994). Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dawson, Michael (2001). Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903[1996]). The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Penguin Group.
Edelin, Ramona (1990). Toward an African-American Agenda: An Inward Look. In Janet Dewart (Ed.), The State of Black America 1990, pp. 173–184. New York: National Urban League.
Epstein, David and Sharyn O'Halloran (1999). A Social Science Approach to Race, Redistricting, and Representation. American Political Science Review, 93: 187–191.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard (1977). U.S. House Members in their Constituencies: An Exploration. American Political Science Review, 71: 883–917.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard (1978). Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Fiorina, Morris P. (1974). Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
Gay, Claudine (2001). The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation. American Political Science Review, 95: 589–602.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine (2002). Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and their Government. American Political Science Review, 46: 717–733.Google Scholar
Georgia v. Ashcroft et al. (2003). 195 F. Supp. 2d 25.
Hajnal, Zoltan L. (2001). White Residents, Black Incumbents, and a Declining Racial Divide. American Political Science Review, 95: 603–617.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L. (1996). Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hero, Rodney E. and Caroline J. Tolbert (1995). Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science, 39: 640–652.Google Scholar
Herring, Mary (1990). Legislative Responsiveness to Black Constituents in Three Deep South States. Journal of Politics, 52: 740–758.Google Scholar
Herron, Michael and Kenneth Shotts (2000). Using Ecological Inference Point Estimates in Second Stage Linear Regressions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology in Los Angeles, California, on August 16.
Jones, Mark P. (1997). Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentina Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives. Policy Studies Journal, 25: 613–629.Google Scholar
Kerr, Brinck and Will Miller (1999). Latino Representation: It's Direct and Indirect. American Journal of Political Science, 41: 1066–1071.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald and Tali Mendelberg (1995). Cracks in American Apartheid: The Political Impact of Prejudice among Desegregated Whites. Journal of Politics, 57: 402–424.Google Scholar
King, Gary (1989). Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Gary (1997). A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
King, Gary and Kenneth Benoit (2000). A(n Easy) Program for Ecological Inference. Version 2.23. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. 〈http://gking.harvard.edu/〉.
Kingdon, John W. (1989). Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 2ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Krehbiel, Keith (1995). Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z. American Journal of Political Science, 39: 906–923.Google Scholar
Leader, Shelah Gilbert (1977). The Policy Impact of Elected Women Officials. In Joseph Cooper and Louis Maisels (Eds.), The Impact of the Electoral Process. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lublin, David (1997). The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lusane, Clarence (1994). Unity and Struggle: The Political Behavior of African American Members of Congress. The Black Scholar, 24: 16–29.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest and Lee Sigelman (1996). The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics, 58: 819–830.Google Scholar
Marable, Manning (2002). The Great Wells of Democracy: The Meaning of Race in American Life. New York: Basic Books.
Matthews, Donald R. and James A. Stimson (1975). Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Mayhew, David R. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Merelman, Richard (1995). Representing Black Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Miller, Cheryl M. (1990). Agenda Setting by State Legislative Black Caucuses: Policy Priorities and Factors of Success. Policy Studies Review, 9: 339–354.Google Scholar
Nelson, Albert J. (1991). Emerging Influentials in State Legislatures: Women, Blacks, and Hispanics. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Palmquist, Bradley (1999). Analysis of Proportions Data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Society in College Station, Texas, July 15–19.
Prentice, R. L. (1986). Binary Regression Using an Extended Beta-Binomial Distribution, with Discussion of Correlation Induced by Covariate Measurement Errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Applications, 81: 321–327.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sinclair, Barbara (1983). Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sinclair, Barbara (2000). Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Smith, Robert C. (1996). We Have No Leaders: African Americans in the Post-Civil Rights Era. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Swain, Carol (1995). Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Swers, Michele L. (2003). Transforming the Agenda? Analyzing Gender Differences in Women's Issue Bill Sponsorship. In Cindy Simon Rosenthal (Ed.), Women Transforming Congress, pp. 260–283. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Swers, Michele L. and Amy Caiazza (2000). Transforming the Political Agenda? Gender Differences in Bill Sponsorship on Women's Issues. IWPR Publication #I906. Washington, DC: Institute for Women's Policy Research.
Tamerius, Karen (1995). Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women. In Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly (Eds.), Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance, pp. 93–112. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Thomas, Sue (1991). The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies. Journal of Politics, 53: 958–976.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue (1994). Women in State Legislatures: One Step at a Time. In Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox (Eds.), The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, pp. 141–159. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Thornburg v. Gingles (1986). 478 US 30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1993). Congressional District Profiles: 102nd Congress. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1995). Congressional District Profiles: 103rd Congress. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1997). Congressional District Profiles: 104th Congress. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1999). Congressional District Profiles: 105th Congress. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
Uslaner, Eric M. (1999). The Movers and the Shirkers: Representatives and Ideologues in the Senate. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Vandoren, Peter M. (1990). Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll-Call Data? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15: 311–340.Google Scholar
Walters, Ronald (2003). White Nationalism Black Interests: Conservative Public Policy and the Black Community. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Weissberg, Robert (1978). Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 72: 535–547.Google Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J. (1997). The Color of Representation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Williams, Melissa S. (1998). Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zaller, John (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef