Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-4p99k Total loading time: 0.303 Render date: 2022-12-07T18:21:44.116Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The New Testament, Mosaic Law and Ecclesiastical Law Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Anthony Bash
Affiliation:
Solicitor, Bishop of Hull's Chaplain to the Legal Profession

Extract

This article explores the New Testament's critique of Old Testament law, a genus of positive law. It looks at the applicability of that critique to modern ecclesiastical law: The article identifies three common misconceptions about the view of the New Testament concerning Old Testament law, and then sets out what the New Testament does say about Old Testament law, principally from the writings of St Paul. The principles underlying the New Testament's critique are established. The critique is made not on natural law grounds but on pragmatic and utilitarian grounds. The grounds of the critique are (i) the efficacy of the law to achieve its true intent; and (ii) the extent to which human beings exaggerate the usefulness of Old Testament law.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This is an edited and adapted version of a paper given at a conference on 23 February 2004 at the University of Hull to celebrate the golden jubilee of the teaching of theology at the University.Google Scholar

2 Sanders, E P, Paul and Palestinian Judaism (SCM Press, London, 1977)Google Scholar and Paul, the Law and the Jewish People (SCM Press, London, 1983). Sanders' views have been further developed and refined by, among others, most notably J D G Dunn and N T Wright, now the Bishop of Durham.Google Scholar

3 References are to St Paul's Letter to the Romans unless stated otherwise.Google Scholar

4 Here I offer my apologies to those who do not like a neologism derived from discrete Greek and Latin roots: ‘nomostreph’ or ‘legovert’ may satisfy the purist but they lack elegance and impact.Google Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The New Testament, Mosaic Law and Ecclesiastical Law Today
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The New Testament, Mosaic Law and Ecclesiastical Law Today
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The New Testament, Mosaic Law and Ecclesiastical Law Today
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *