Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:05:08.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Industrial Development and the Conservation of Vascular Plants, with Special Reference to Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John G. Kelcey
John G. Kelcey
Affiliation:
Consultant Ecologist, 4 Waterside, Peartree Bridge, Milton Keynes, England, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper, which has been nearly a decade in gestation, describes the contribution that industrial development makes to the conservation of wild plants in Britain. It challenges the priorities of the British conservation movement in concentrating its efforts on rare species and habitats, on the creation of Nature reserves, and on the maintenance of rare species as rare species. A more positive approach is now advocated, stressing the need to prevent common species from becoming rare, the creation of new habitats, and the propagation and reintroduction of uncommon species.

Whilst species conservation is relatively easy to justify and comprehend, habitat conservation is considerably more difficult. ‘Industrial habitats’ may be defined as those derived from any industrial process (including transport routes). Such habitats are characterized by a complex association and interaction of slope, aspect, drainage, nutrient status, and the chemical and physical characteristics of the skeletal soils—all of which are apt to change markedly over very short distances. In addition they are generally open, lack stability, do not receive frequent applications of fertilizer and/or herbicide, and are often inaccessible or well protected.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1984 , pp. 235 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bowen, H.J.M. (1968). Flora of Berkshire. Holywell Press, Oxford, England, UK: 389 pp.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A.D. (1977). Conservation problems in the future. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 1977, pp. 77–96, illustr.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A.D. (1979). Derelict land—is the tidying-up going too far? The Planner, 65, pp. 85–8, illustr.Google Scholar
Clapham, A.R. (Ed.) (1969). Flora of Derbyshire. County Museum and Art Gallery, Derby, England, UK: viii + 381 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Davis, B.N.K. (1976). Wildlife, urbanisation and industry. Biol. Conserv., 10, pp. 249–91, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B.N.K. (1977). The Hieracium flora of chalk and limestone quarries in England. Watsonia, 11, pp. 345–51, illustr.Google Scholar
Davis, B.N.K. (1979). Chalk and limestone quarries as wildlife habitats. Minerals and the Environment, 1, pp. 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B.N.K. (Ed.) (1982). Ecology of Quarries. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge, England, UK: 77 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dony, J.G. (1953). Flora of Bedfordshire. Corporation of Luton, Museum and Art Gallery, Luton, England, UK: 532 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dony, J.G. (1967). Flora of Hertfordshire. Hitchin Urban District Council, Hitchin, England, UK: 112 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Edees, E.S. (1972). Flora of Staffordshire. David & Charles, Newton Abbot, Devon, England, UK: viii + 288 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gemmell, R.P. (1977). Colonization of Industrial Wasteland. (Studies in Biology, No. 80.) Edward Arnold, London, England, UK: 75 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E.F. & Gemmell, R.P. (1978). Derelict industrial land as a habitat for rare plants in S. Lanes, (v.c. 59) and W. Lanes (v.c. 60). Watsonia, 12, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. (1974). The Sevenoaks Gravel Pit Reserve. WAGBI, Chester, England, UK: 116 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Halliday, R.J., Johnson, M.S. & Bradshaw, A.D. (1979). Wildlife conservation and mining of alluvial tin resves in Southwest England. Biol. Conserv., 16, pp. 245–64, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, J.W. & Richardson, J.A. (1953). The Magnesium Limestone area of Durham and its vegetation. Trans. Northern Nat. Union, 2(1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Johnson, M.S. (1978). Land reclamation and the botanical significance of some former mining and manufacturing sites in Britain. Environmental Conservation, 5(3), pp. 223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.S., Putwain, P.D. & Halliday, R.J. (1978). Wildlife conservation of derelict metalliferous mine workings in Wales. Biol. Conserv., 14, pp. 131–48, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1975). Indusrial development and wildlife conservation. Environmental Conservation, 2(2), pp. 99–109, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1977). Creative ecology, Part 1: Selected terrestrial habitats. Landscape Design, No. 120, pp. 34–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1978 a). Creative ecology, Part 2: Selected aquatic habitats. Landscape Design, No. 121, pp. 36–8, illustr.Google Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1978 b). Why reclaim: A reappraisal of current attitudes in Great Britain. Reclamation Review, 1, pp. 157–61.Google Scholar
Kelcey, John G. (1982). Ecological aspects of the urbanization of a Canal. Pp. 231–42 in Urban Ecology (Ed. Bornkamm, R. et al. ). Blackwell, Oxford, England, UK: xiv + 370 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lee, J.A. & Greenwood, B. (1976). The colonization by plants of calcareous wastes from the salt and alkali industry in Cheshire, England, Biol. Conserv., 10, pp. 131–49, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.A. (1975). The conservation of British inland salt marshes. Biol. Conserv., 8, pp. 143–51, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, N.W. (1967). Nature Conservation and Roadside Verges. Paper presented to Conference on ‘Roads in the Landscape’, July 1967. Ministry of Transport and British Roads Federation: 6 pp. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Newton, A. (1971). Flora of Cheshire. Cheshire Community Council, Chester, England, UK: 258 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Perring, F.H. (1967). Verges are vital—a botanist looks at our roadsides. J. Inst. High. Engin., 14(12), pp. 13–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Perring, F.H. (1969). The botanical importance of roadside verges. Pp. 8–14 in Way, 1969 (q.v.).Google Scholar
Perring, F.H., Sell, P.D., Walters, S.M. & Whitehouse, H.L.K. (1964). A Flora of Cambridgeshire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xvi + 365 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Scott, N.E. & Davison, A.W. (1982). De-icing salt and the invasion of road verges by maritime plants. Watsonia, 14, pp. 41–52, illustr.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J. (1976). Union Canal Biological Survey. Department of Physical Planning, Lothian Regional Council, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: 39 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Twigg, H. (1959). Freshwater in the Shropshire Union Canal. Field Studies, 1(1), pp. 116–42, illustr.Google Scholar
Way, J.M. (Ed.) (1969). Road Verges—Their Function and Management. (Proc. Symp. London, 1969). Monks Wood Experimental Station, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, England, UK: 93 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Way, J.M. (1970). Roads and the conservation of wildlife. J. Inst. High. Engin., 17(7), pp. 2–8, illustr.Google Scholar
Way, J.M. (1977). Roadside verges and conservation in Britain: a review. Biol. Conserv., 12, pp. 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, T.C.E., Bell, S. & Frost, A. (1981). Creating Attractive Grassland's Using Native Plant Species. Nature Conservancy Council, Shrewsbury, England, UK: 35 pp., illustr.Google Scholar