Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Paying the forest for electricity: a modelling framework to market forest conservation as payment for ecosystem services benefiting hydropower generation

  • MAURICIO E. ARIAS (a1), THOMAS A. COCHRANE (a1), KEITH S. LAWRENCE (a2), TIMOTHY J. KILLEEN (a2) and TRACY A. FARRELL (a2)...
Summary

The operation and longevity of hydropower dams are often negatively impacted by sedimentation. Forest conservation can reduce soil erosion, and therefore efforts to maintain upstream forest cover within a watershed contribute to the economic life span of a hydropower facility. The cost of forest conservation can be viewed as an investment in hydropower and be financed via a payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme. A novel modelling framework is used to estimate payments for forest conservation consisting of: (1) land-use change projection; (2) watershed erosion modelling; (3) reservoir sedimentation estimation; (4) power generation loss calculation; and (5) PES scheme design. The framework was applied to a proposed dam in Cambodia (Pursat 1). The estimated net present value of forest conservation was US$ 4.7 million when using average annual climate values over 100 years, or US$ 6.4 million when considering droughts every eight years. This can be remunerated with annual payments of US$ 4.26 ha−1 or US$ 5.78 ha−1, respectively, covering forest protection costs estimated at US$ 0.9 ha−1 yr−1. The application of this type of PES represents a rational option that allows for conservation and development of hydropower watersheds susceptible to erosion and sedimentation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Thomas A. Cochrane Tel: +64 3 364 2378 Fax: +64 3 364 2758 e-mail: tom.cochrane@canterbury.ac.nz
References
Hide All
Aruna Technology Ltd (2006) The Atlas of Cambodia: National Poverty and Environment Maps. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Save's Cambodia's Wildlife/Danida.
Badola, R. & Hussain, S.A. (2005) Valuing ecosystem functions: an empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environmental Conservation 32 (1): 8592.
Bruijnzeel, L.A. (2004) Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 104 (1): 185228.
Brune, G.M. (1953) Trap efficiency of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 34 (3): 407418.
Cochrane, T.A., Norton, L.D., Castro, C. & Cavigglione, J.H. (2004) Development of a river sediment transport monitoring system for large reservoirs. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 20 (6): 771781.
Constanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groots, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & van den Belt, M. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (May 15): 253260.
Costanza, R., Pérez-Maqueo, O., Martinez, M.L., Sutton, P., Anderson, S.J. & Mulder, K. (2008). The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 37 (4): 241248.
Cruz, W., Francisco, H. & Conway, Z. (1988) The on-site and downstream costs of soil erosion in the Magat and Pantabangan Watersheds. Journal of Philippine Development 15 (26): 85111.
Emerton, L. (2005) Values and Rewards: Counting and Capturing Ecosystem Water Services for Sustainable Development. IUCN Water, Nature and Economics Technical Paper No 1. IUCN, The World Conservation Union.
Fu, K.D., He, D.M. & Lu, X.X. (2008) Sedimentation in the Manwan reservoir in the Upper Mekong and its downstream impacts. Quaternary International 186 (1): 9199.
George, A., Pierret, A., Boonsaner, A., Valentin, C., Orange, D. & Planchon, O. (2009) Potential and limitations of payments for environmental services (PES) as a means to manage watershed services in mainland Southeast Asia. International Journal of the Commons 3 (1): 1640.
Greiber, T. (2009) Payments for Ecosystem Services. Legal and Institutional Frameworks. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Hajramurni, A. (2010) Makassar dam threatened by sediment, experts say. The Jakarta Post May 21 [www document]. URL http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/05/21/makassar-dam-threatened-sediment-experts-say.html
IHA (2010) Activity Report. International Hydropower Association, London, UK [www document]. URL http://www.hydropower.org/downloads/ActivityReports/IHA_Activity_Report_2010.pdf
Keskinen, M. (2008) Water resources development and impact assessment in the Mekong Basin: which way to go? Ambio 37 (3): 193198.
Killeen, T.J. (2007) A Perfect Storm in the Amazon Wilderness, Development and Conservation in the Context of the Initiative for Integration of the Regional Infrastructure of South America (IIRSA). Applications in Applied Biodiversity Science, Volume 7. Washington, DC, USA: Conservation International.
King, P., Bird, J. & Haas, L. (2007) The Current Status of Environmental Criteria for Hydropower Development in the Mekong Region: A Literature Compilation. Vientiane, Lao PDR: ADB/MRC/WWF.
Klipsch, J.D. & Hursh, M.B. (2007) HEC-ResSim Reservoir System Simulation User's Manual Version 3.0. Computer Program Documentation 82. Davis, CA, USA: US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute of Water Resources, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Kummu, M., Lu, X.X., Wang, J.J. & Varis, O. (2010) Basin-wide sediment trapping efficiency of emerging reservoirs along the Mekong. Geomorphology 119 (3–4): 181197.
Kummu, M. & Varis, O. (2007) Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping, the Lower Mekong River. Geomorphology 85 (3): 275293.
Kummu, M. & Sarkkula, J. (2008) Impact of the Mekong River flow alteration on the Tonle Sap flood pulse. Ambio 37 (3): 185192.
Lamb, D. & Gilmour, D. (2000) A Succinct Overview of the Issues from the Scientific Sessions as a Basis for Interfacing with Policy. UNESCO Symposium on Forest-Water-People in the Humid Tropics. Bangi, Malaysia: UNESCO.
Leimgruber, P., Kelly, D.S., Steininger, M.K., Brunner, J., Ller, T. & Songer, M. (2005) Forest cover change patterns in Myanmar (Burma) 1990–2000. Environmental Conservation 32 (4): 356364.
Lu, X.X. & Higgitt, D. L. (2001) Sediment delivery to the Three Gorges: 2. Local response. Geomorphology 41 (2): 157169.
MA (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Mayaux, P., Holmgren, P., Achard, F., Eva, H., Stibig, H. & Branthomme, A. (2005) Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360 (1454): 373384.
Mohd Shahwahid, H.O., Awang Noor, A.G., Abdul Rahim, N., Zulkifli, Y. & Razani, U. (1997) Economic benefits of watershed protection and trade-off with timber production: a case study in Malaysia. Research Report. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
MRC (2009 a) Hydropower Project Database. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission.
MRC (2009 b) Mekong River Commission Spatial Database. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Mekong River Commission [www document]. URL http://www.mrcmekong.org/spatial/data_catalog.htm
Mulder, I., ten Kate, T. & Scherr, S. (2006) Private sector demand in markets for ecosystem services: preliminary findings. Adapted from full report submitted to the UNDP-GEF project: Institutionalizing Payments for Ecosystem Services, supplement III. Mobilizing Private Sector Buyers for Ecosystem Services. Washington, DC, USA: Forest Trends Association.
Nagle, G.N. (2002) The contribution of agricultural erosion to reservoir sedimentation in the Dominican Republic. Water Policy 3 (6): 491505.
Pearce, D.W. (2001) The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosystem Health 7 (4): 284296.
Renard, K.G., Laflen, J.M., Foster, G.R. & McCool, D. K. (1994) The revised universal loss equation. In: Soil Erosion Research Methods, ed. Lal, R., pp. 105126. Delray Beach, FL, USA: St Lucie Press.
Rojas, M. & Aylward, B. (2002) The Case of La Esperanza: A Small, Private, Hydropower Producer and a Conservation NGO in Costa Rica. Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Case Study Series. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Rowcroft, P. (2008) Frontiers of change: the reasons behind land-use change in the Mekong Basin. Ambio 37 (3): 213218.
Sadiki, A., Faleh, A., Navas, A. & Bouhlassa, S. (2007) Assessing soil erosion and control factors by the radiometric technique in the Boussouab catchment, Eastern Rif, Morocco. CATENA 71 (1): 1320.
Shields, F.D Jr, Simon, A. & Steffen, L.J. (2002) Reservoir effects on downstream river channel migration. Environmental Conservation 27 (1): 5466.
Syvitski, J.P.M., Vörösmarty, C. J., Kettner, A.J. & Green, P. (2005) Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 308 (5720): 376380.
Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., Nelson, E. & Ennaanay, D. (2010) InVEST 1.005 Beta User's Guide:Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs. Stanford, USA: The Natural Capital Project.
Ton, S., Odum, H.T. & Delfino, J.J. (1998) Ecological-economic evaluation of wetland management alternatives. Ecological Engineering 11 (1): 291302.
WCD (2000) Dams and Development. A New Framework for Decision-making. The Report of the World Commission on Dams. London, UK and Sterling, VA, USA: Earthscan Publications Ltd [www document]. URL http://www.unep.org/dams/WCD/report/WCD_DAMS%20report.pdf
Winchell, M., Srinivasan, R., Di Luzio, M. & Arnold, J. (2010). ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT2009: User's Guide. Temple, TX, USA [www document]. URL http://swatmodel.tamu.edu/software/arcswat
Zheng, J., He, X., Walling, D., Zhang, X., Flanagan, D. & Qi, Y. (2007). Assessing soil erosion rates on manually-tilled hillslopes in the Sichuan Hilly Basin Using 137Cs and 210Pbex measurements. Pedosphere 17 (3): 273283.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Appendix

Arias Supplementary Appendix
Arias Supplementary Appendix

 Word (114 KB)
114 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed