Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 50
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lee, Jae-hyuck and Son, Yong-hoon 2016. Stakeholder Subjectives Toward Ecotourism Development using Q methodology: The Case of Maha Ecotourism Site in Pyeongchang, Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, Vol. 21, Issue. 8, p. 931.

    Mc Guinness, S. K. 2016. Perceptions of crop raiding: effects of land tenure and agro-industry on human-wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation,

    Munanura, Ian E. Backman, Kenneth F. Hallo, Jeffrey C. and Powell, Robert B. 2016. Perceptions of tourism revenue sharing impacts on Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda: a Sustainable Livelihoods framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, p. 1.

    Hill, Wendy Byrne, Jason and Pickering, Catherine 2015. The ‘hollow-middle’: why positive community perceptions do not translate into pro-conservation behaviour in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 168.

    León, Carmelo J. de León, Javier Araña, Jorge E. and González, Matías M. 2015. Tourists' preferences for congestion, residents' welfare and the ecosystems in a national park. Ecological Economics, Vol. 118, p. 21.

    Mintzer, Vanessa J. Schmink, Marianne Lorenzen, Kai Frazer, Thomas K. Martin, Anthony R. and da Silva, Vera M. F. 2015. Attitudes and behaviors toward Amazon River dolphins (Inia geoffrensis) in a sustainable use protected area. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 247.

    Pandit, Ram Dhakal, Maheshwar and Polyakov, Maksym 2015. Valuing access to protected areas in Nepal: The case of Chitwan National Park. Tourism Management, Vol. 50, p. 1.

    Cong, Li Wu, Bihu Morrison, Alastair M. Shu, Hua and Wang, Mu 2014. Analysis of wildlife tourism experiences with endangered species: An exploratory study of encounters with giant pandas in Chengdu, China. Tourism Management, Vol. 40, p. 300.

    Mc Guinness, Shane and Taylor, David 2014. Farmers’ Perceptions and Actions to Decrease Crop Raiding by Forest-Dwelling Primates Around a Rwandan Forest Fragment. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 179.

    Munanura, Ian E. Backman, Kenneth F. Moore, DeWayne D. Hallo, Jeffrey C. and Powell, Robert B. 2014. Household Poverty Dimensions Influencing Forest Dependence at Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda: An Application of the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework. Natural Resources, Vol. 05, Issue. 16, p. 1031.

    Sousa, Joana Vicente, Luís Gippoliti, Spartaco Casanova, Catarina and Sousa, Cláudia 2014. Local knowledge and perceptions of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. American Journal of Primatology, Vol. 76, Issue. 2, p. 122.

    BROWNE-NUÑEZ, CHRISTINE JACOBSON, SUSAN K. and VASKE, JERRY J. 2013. Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions for allowing elephants in group ranches around amboseli national park, Kenya. Wildlife Society Bulletin, p. n/a.

    Morton, F. Blake Todd, Angelique F. Lee, Phyllis and Masi, Shelly 2013. Observational Monitoring of Clinical Signs during the Last Stage of Habituation in a Wild Western Gorilla Group at Bai Hokou, Central African Republic. Folia Primatologica, Vol. 84, Issue. 2, p. 118.

    Muhumuza, Moses and Balkwill, Kevin 2013. Factors Affecting the Success of Conserving Biodiversity in National Parks: A Review of Case Studies from Africa. International Journal of Biodiversity, Vol. 2013, p. 1.

    Wood, Apanie L. Butler, James R.A. Sheaves, Marcus and Wani, Jacob 2013. Sport fisheries: Opportunities and challenges for diversifying coastal livelihoods in the Pacific. Marine Policy, Vol. 42, p. 305.

    Ahebwa, Wilber Manyisa van der Duim, Rene and Sandbrook, Chris 2012. Tourism revenue sharing policy at Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: a policy arrangements approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 377.

    Anand, Anupam Chandan, Pankaj and Singh, Ram Babu 2012. Homestays at Korzok: Supplementing Rural Livelihoods and Supporting Green Tourism in the Indian Himalayas. Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 126.

    BAKER, JULIA MILNER-GULLAND, E. J. and LEADER-WILLIAMS, NIGEL 2012. Park Gazettement and Integrated Conservation and Development as Factors in Community Conflict at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 160.

    Hofman-Kamińska, Emilia and Kowalczyk, Rafał 2012. Farm Crops Depredation by European Bison (Bison bonasus) in the Vicinity of Forest Habitats in Northeastern Poland. Environmental Management, Vol. 50, Issue. 4, p. 530.

    Karanth, Krithi K. and Nepal, Sanjay K. 2012. Local Residents Perception of Benefits and Losses From Protected Areas in India and Nepal. Environmental Management, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 372.


Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities

  • Karen Archabald (a1) and Lisa Naughton-Treves (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2002

Throughout much of the tropics, human-wildlife conflict impedes local support for national parks. By channelling tourism revenue to local residents, conservationists hope to offset wildlife costs and improve local attitudes toward conservation. To date tourism revenue-sharing (TRS) programmes have met mixed success. Local conditions and national policies that shape the success of TRS programmes were identified by comparing the experiences of both implementers and beneficiaries of pilot TRS programmes at three parks in western Uganda. Between 1995 and 1998, communities around these parks used a total of US $83 000 of tourism revenue to build 21 schools, four clinics, one bridge, and one road. In 1996, the Ugandan parliament passed legislation that changed both the amount of money available for TRS and the institutions responsible for sharing the money. The programme was suspended at all three parks while the implementing agency (Uganda Wildlife Authority) struggled to design a programme that complied with the new legislation. TRS funds collected before 1996 were shared through 1998, but since then no revenue has been shared. However, a revised TRS programme is expected to resume in 2001. In semi-structured interviews, both implementers and beneficiaries evaluated local TRS programmes and compared them to other benefit-sharing projects, particularly those promoting sustainable use of non-timber products within park boundaries (n = 44). Both groups of respondents listed revenue-sharing as the most important advantage of living next to a national park. Seventy-two per cent of respondents indicated that they thought TRS had improved attitudes towards the protected areas, and 53% thought TRS was more important then sustainable use of non-timber forest products. Although respondents were generally positive about TRS, in informal discussions respondents repeatedly mentioned four potential obstacles to TRS success, namely poorly defined TRS policies and unsteady implementing institutions, corruption, inadequate funds, and numerous stakeholders with differing priorities. From this survey and literature from experiences in other African countries, there are four key components of successful revenue-sharing programmes: long-term institutional support, appropriate identification of the target community and project type, transparency and accountability, and adequate funding. With firm institutional support and realistic expectations, TRS can play an important role in improving local attitudes towards conservation.

Corresponding author
Correspondence: Dr Lisa Naughton-Treves Tel: +1 608 262 4846 e-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *