Skip to main content
×
×
Home

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS & CASE STUDIES: Reflections on Green Infrastructure Economics

  • Martin Jaffe (a1)
Abstract

Because green infrastructure used for urban storm-water management also serves larger ecosystem services functions (such as providing habitat, recharging aquifers, and minimizing erosion), proponents of these management strategies tend also to value these ancillary functions in making a case for their use when compared to conventional urban storm-water collection and detention approaches. Recent research, however, suggests that green infrastructure strategies are cost-effective when compared to conventional storm-water management approaches, even when evaluated in terms of their direct costs and savings over their useful lives. Problems with using more indirect methods of valuation include unnecessary complexity, analytical asymmetry, and distributional distortions. A case can therefore be made that assessing only the direct economic savings of green infrastructure over conventional storm-water infrastructure may be more persuasive for public policy purposes than valuing the more speculative indirect benefits in cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses of green compared to conventional storm-water management strategies.

Environmental Practice 12:357–365 (2010)

Copyright
Corresponding author
Martin Jaffe, Department of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 412 South Peoria Street, no. 215 (MC 348), Chicago, IL 60607; (phone) 312-996-2178; (fax) 312-413-2314; (e-mail) mjaffe@uic.edu
References
Hide All
Braden, J.B., and Johnson, D.M.. 2004. Downstream Economic Benefits from Storm-Water Management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 30(6):498505.
Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT). 2007. Green Values Stormwater Management Calculator Methodology. CNT, Chicago, 5 pp.http://logan.cnt.org/calculator/methodology (accessed September 24, 2010).
Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT). 2009. Green Values Stormwater Management Calculator. CNT, Chicago. http://greenvalues.cnt.org/calculator/calculator.php (accessed September 24, 2010).
Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). 2010. Addendum on Green Infrastructure. IDNR, Springfield, 13 pp. Available at http://www.epa.state.il.us/green-infrastructure/docs/idnr-report-addendum.pdf (accessed July 27, 2010).
Jaffe, M., Zellner, M., Minor, E., Gonzalez-Meler, M., Cotner, L., Massey, D., Ahmed, H., Elberts, M., Sprague, H., Wise, S., and Miller, B.. 2010. Using Green Infrastructure to Manage Urban Stormwater Quality: A Review of Selected Practices and State Programs. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Water, Springfield, 146 pp. Available at http://www.epa.state.il.us/green-infrastructure/docs/public-act-recommendations.pdf (accessed July 27, 2010).
MacMullan, E., and Reich, S.. 2007. The Economics of Low-Impact Development: A Literature Review. ECONorthwest, Eugene, OR, 39 pp. Available at http://www.econw.com/reports/ECONorthwest_Low-Impact-Development-Economics-Literature-Review.pdf (accessed July 28, 2010).
Marceau, M.M., Nisbet, M.A., and VanGeem, M.G.. 2007. Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete. PCA R&D serial no. 3011. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 113 pp. Available at http://www.cement.org/bookstore/profile.asp?itemid=SN3011 (accessed July 28, 2010).
National Research Council. 2005. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 277 pp.
Obla, K.H. 2009. What Is Green Concrete? Concrete in Focus 8(3):1719.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2003, September 17. Circular A-4: Regulatory Analysis. OMB, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, 48 pp. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/ (accessed July 27, 2010).
Tomalty, R., and Komorowski, B., Doiron, with D.. 2010. The Monetary Value of the Soft Benefits of Green Roofs: Final Report to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Smart Cities Research Services, Montreal, 90 pp.
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2007. Reducing Stormwater Costs through Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies and Practices. USEPA Report EPA 841-F-07-006. USEPA, Nonpoint Source Control Branch, Washington, DC, 37 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/owow/NPS/lid/costs07/ (accessed July 28, 2010).
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2009. Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services: A Report of the Science Advisory Board. USPEA Report EPA-SAB-09012. USEPA, Washington, DC, 129 pp. Available at http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/F3DB1F5C6EF90EE1852575C500589157/$File/EPA-SAB-09-012-unsigned.pdf (accessed July 27, 2010).
Ward, W. 2010, February 24. Letter from William Ward, Executive Vice President of Home Builders Association of Illinois, to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://www.epa.state.il.us/green-infrastructure/docs/stakeholder-comments.pdf (accessed July 28, 2010).
Wise, S., Braden, J., Ghalayini, D., Grant, J., Kloss, C., MacMullan, E., Morse, S., Montalto, F., Nees, D., Nowak, D., Peck, S., Shaikh, S., and Yu, C.. 2010. Integrating Valuation Methods to Recognize Green Infrastructure's Multiple Benefits. Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, 21 pp. Available at http://www.cnt.org/repository/CNT-LID-paper.pdf (accessed July 27, 2010).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 168 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 896 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.