Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Co-Management of Natural Resources: Opportunities for and Barriers to Working with Citizen Volunteers

  • Ryan Plummer (a1) and Susan M. Arai (a2)
Abstract

Co-management is an innovative approach for managing the natural environment and providing opportunities for outdoor recreation. It combines the efforts of government agencies legally responsible for environmental quality with those of citizens and interest groups using such resources. This article documents the experiences gained from a co-management process involving the Tine River (a pseudonym) corridor in Ontario. The analysis focuses on revealing factors that fostered opportunities and presented barriers to the voluntary nature of the process. Sharing common objectives, the presence and characteristics of a network, and willingness to share information appear to create opportunities for continued involvement. Different perceptions of intent, particularly between nongovernment and government participants, and failure to fulfill commitments, appear to destroy opportunities for involvement by citizens. Implications from this study are particularly relevant to government agencies, which are identified in this particular case as being responsible for creating significant barriers to this new mode of operation through both past and current actions. Recommendations are made for environmental professionals to foster opportunities and limit barriers to working with volunteers in pursuing co-management.

Environmental Practice 7:221–234 (2005)

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Ryan Plummer, Associate Professor, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Ave., St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1; (fax) 905-984-4843; (e-mail) rplummer@brocku.ca.
References
Hide All
Ahn, T. K., E.Ostrom, and J. M.Walker. 2003. Heterogeneous Preferences and Collective Action. Public Choice117:295314.

Bennett, A.1998. Sustainable Public/Private Partnerships for Public Service Delivery. Natural Resource Forum22(3):193199.

Byron, I., and A.Curtis. 2002. Maintaining Volunteer Commitment to Local Watershed Initiatives. Environmental Management30(1):5967.

Caldwell, L. L., and K. L.Andereck. 1994. Motives for Initiating and Continuing Membership in Recreation-Related Voluntary Associations. Leisure Sciences16:3344.

Carlsson, L., and F.Berkes. 2005. Co-Management: Concepts and Methodological Implications. Journal of Environmental Management75:6576.

Castro, A. P., and E.Nielsen. 2001. Indigenous People and Co-Management: Implications for Conflict Management. Environmental Science and Policy4:229239.

Chaskin, R. J.2001. Building Community Capacity. Urban Affairs Review36(3):291323.

Chuenpagdee, R., J.Fraga, and J. I.Euá-avila. 2004. Progressing Toward Comanagement through Participatory Research. Society and Natural Resources17:147161.

Cnaan, R. A., and L.Amrofell. 1994. Mapping Volunteer Activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly23(4):335351.

Cnaan, R. A., F.Handy, and M.Wadsworth. 1996. Defining Who is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly25(3):364383.

Coleman, J. S.1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology94 (supplement):S95S120.

Curtis, A., and M.Van Nouhuys. 1999. Landcare Participation in Australia: The Volunteer Perspective. Sustainable Development7:98111.

Darwall, W. T., and N. K.Dulvy. 1996. An Evaluation of the Suitability of Non-Specialist Volunteer Researchers for Coral Reef Fish Surveys. Biological Conservation78:223231.

Dennis, S., and E. H.Zube. 1988. Voluntary Association Membership of Outdoor Recreationists: An Exploratory Study. Leisure Sciences10:229245.

Foster-Smith, J., and S. M.Evans. 2003. The Value of Marine Ecological Data Collected by Volunteers. Biological Conservation113:199213.

Gaston, K., and J. A.Alexander. 2001. Effective Organization and Management of Public Sector Volunteer Workers. The International Journal of Public Sector Management14(1):5974.

Hauck, M., and M.Sowman. 2001. Coastal and Fisheries Co-Management in South Africa: An Overview and Analysis. Marine Policy25:173185.

Innes, J.1998. Information in Communicative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association64(1):5264.

Jentoft, S.2000. Legitimacy and Disappointment in Fisheries Management. Marine Policy24:141148.

Katz, E. G.2000. Social Capital and Natural Capital: A Comparative Analysis of Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management in Guatemala. Land Economics76(1):114132.

Lane, M. B.2001. Affirming New Directions in Planning Theory: Comanagement of Protected Areas. Society and Natural Resources14:657671.

Mendoza, G. A., and R.Prabhu. 2005. Combining Participatory Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Community-Based Forest Management. Forest Ecology and Management207(1–2):145156.

Miles, I., W. C.Sullivan, and F. E.Kuo. 1998. Ecological Restoration Volunteers: The Benefits of Participation. Urban Ecosystems2:2741.

Newton, K.2001. Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. International Political Science Review22(2):201214.

Pinkerton, E.1999. Factors in Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Co-Management in British Columbia Salmon Fisheries. Conservation Ecology3(2), http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art2. Accessed October 10, 2004.

Plummer, R., and J.FitzGibbon. 2004a. Some Observations on the Terminology in Co-operative Environmental Management. Journal of Environmental Management70(1):6372.

Plummer, R., and J.FitzGibbon. 2004b. Co-Management of Natural Resources: A Proposed Framework. Environmental Management33(6):876885.

Plummer, H. R., and C. L.Stacey. 2000. A Multiple Case Study of Community-Based Water Management Initiatives in New Brunswick. Canadian Water Resources Journal25(3):293307.

Pomeroy, R. S., and F.Berkes. 1997. Two to Tango: The Role of Government in Fisheries Co-Management. Marine Policy21(5):465480.

Pomeroy, R. S., B. M.Katon, and I.Harkes. 2001. Conditions Affecting the Success of Fisheries Co-Management: Lessons from Asia. Marine Policy25:197208.

Savan, B., A. J.Morgan, and C.Gore. 2003. Volunteer Environmental Monitoring and the Role of Universities: The Case of Citizens' Environment Watch. Environmental Management31(5):561568.

Sen, S., and J. R.Nielsen. 1996. Fisheries Co-Management: A Comparative Analysis. Marine Policy20(5):405418.

Yandle, T.2003. The Challenge of Building Successful Stakeholder Organizations: New Zealand's Experience in Developing a Fisheries Co-Management Regime. Marine Policy27:179192.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 59 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.