Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T05:53:32.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research Article: Perceptions of Environmental Problems by Malaysian Professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Gary S. Silverman*
Affiliation:
Environmental Health Program, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
Marian K. Silverman
Affiliation:
Planning and Quality Improvement, Zepf Center, Toledo, Ohio
*
Professor and Director, Environmental Health Program, 223 Health Center, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403; (fax) 419-372-2897; (e-mail) silverma@bgnet.bgsu.edu.
Get access

Abstract

Malaysian environmental professionals were surveyed to determine their outlook on key environmental issues related to Malaysia and to the world. Learning about environmental perceptions from local decision makers was seen as important because of the rapid economic growth of Malaysia and because of concern that this development may result in the loss of a high-quality tropical environment. Study data should be useful in providing understanding of values relating to environmental management within the country. Results showed that air pollution and waste management were perceived of as key local environmental issues, with industrial air emissions and vehicular exhaust two of the major sources of local environmental degradation. Air pollution may be the more difficult of these problems to solve, perhaps conflicting with economic development interests. Loss of critical habitat, ozone depletion and climate change were viewed as important to global-scale environmental conditions, although habitat destruction was seen as somewhat less important to the local situation. River pollution was identified as the major ecological problem in Malaysia, although drinking water quality was not seen as a critical issue. Malaysian environmental professionals' perceptions of global-scale environmental problems are consistent with much of the international environmental community, knowledge that should be helpful in negotiating future international agreements.

Type
Features & Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aim, A. 1991. Why Didn't We Use Risk Before? EPA Journal 17(2):1316.Google Scholar
Beardsley, T. 1995. Rio Redux: Promises of the Earth Summit are Still Unmet. Scientific American 272:36.Google Scholar
Brookfield, H., and Bryon, Y.. 1990. Deforestation and Timber Extraction in Borneo and the Malay Peninsula—The Record Since 1965. Global Environmental Change 1:4256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, K., Synder, K. C., and Jarvis, W.B.G.. 1996. A Report to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency: Citizens' Preferred Strategies to Reduce Environmental Risks. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Cox, J. E., and Miro, C. R.. 1998. Montreal Protocol is Working. ASHRAE Journal 40(10):20+.Google Scholar
Crouch, H. 1996. Government and Society in Malaysia. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R. E. 1998. Lay Perceptions of Global Risk. International Sociology 13(4):473497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H., and Gallup, A. M.. 1993. Of Global Concern, Results of the Health of the Planet Survey. Environment 35(9):715:3339.Google Scholar
Economist. 1995. Malaysia: Logging On. Economist 335(909):3435.Google Scholar
ENR. 1997. There are Times When Losing isn't so Bad. Engineering News Record 239:118.Google Scholar
Khoo, K. K. 1980. The Malay Peninsula: A Social and Economic Survey 1900–1940. In Glimpses of Malaysian History, Wahis, S.A.A., ed. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur, 9096.Google Scholar
Leete, R. 1996. Malaysia's Demographic Transition. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lodhi, M.A.K., Abidin, A. Z., and Sulaiman, M. Y.. 1997. Pollutant Emissions from Fossil Fuel use in Kuala Lumpur and Environmental Damage. Energy Conversion and Management 38:213–2: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, F. 1994. Are Sarawak's Forests Sustainable? New Scientist 144:2832.Google Scholar
Rasiah, R. 1995. Foreign Capital and Industrialization in Malaysia. St. Martin's Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J. 1996. Europe to Toughen Drinking-Water Standards. Environmental Science & Technology 29:171A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, S. 1993. Environment and Development in Malaysia: Changing Concerns and Approaches. Centre for Environmental Studies at ISIS Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
USEPA. 1987. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation.Google Scholar
USEPA. 1990a. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. The Report of The Science Advisory Board: Relative Risk Reduction Strategies Committee, EPA SAB-EC-90-021, United States Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board (A-101).Google Scholar
USEPA. 1990b. Reducing Risk, Appendix B. The Report of the Human Health Subcommittee, Relative Risk Reduction Project. EPA SAB-EC-90-021B, United States Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board (A-101).Google Scholar
Wysocki, B. Jr. 1997. Silicon Valley East, Malaysia is Gambling on a Costly Plunge into a Cyber Future. The Wall Street Journal, IC(112), 06 10, 1997, p. 1.Google Scholar