Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T23:39:27.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Action of Diphtheria and Diphtheria-like Bacilli on Various Sugars and Carbo-hydrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. S. Graham-Smith
G. S. Graham-Smith
Affiliation:
John Lucas Walker Student, Cambridge University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The experiments here recorded are not sufficiently numerous to justify any decided opinions as to the value of the tests with these various substances in differentiating certain bacilli which very closely resemble the diphtheria bacillus. They show, however, that most of the diphtheria-like organisms tested produce less acid than the diphtheria bacillus. Hofmann's bacillus and a diphtheria-like bacillus from the normal ear can be easily differentiated, since they from no acid. Any bacillus which acts on mannite or saccharose could also be easily differentiated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1906 , pp. 286 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906

References

Axenfeld, T. (1898). Berlin. klin. Wochenschr., XXXV. p. 542.Google Scholar
Babes, V. (1899). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXV. p. 125.Google Scholar
Barannikow, . (1899). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXVI. p. 113.Google Scholar
Benham, C. H. (1906). Brit. Med. Journ., I. p. 1025.Google Scholar
Bergey, D. H. (1898). Publications of Pennsylvania University, No. 4.Google Scholar
Bergey, D. H. (1904). Journ. of Med. Research, XI. p. 445.Google Scholar
Besser, . (1893). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XII. p. 590.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, . (1897). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., p. 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. C. (1903). Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., IX. p. 154.Google Scholar
Cautley, E. (1894). Twenty-fourth Annual Report of the Local Government Board, p. 445.Google Scholar
Cobbett, L. (IV, 1901). Journ. of Hygiene, I. p. 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapelewski, (1898). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXIII. p. 97.Google Scholar
Davis, L. D. (1899). Medical News, LXXIV. p. 520.Google Scholar
Dean, G. (1905). Journ. of Hygiene, V. p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Simoni, A. (1898). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXIV. p. 294.Google Scholar
De Simoni, A. (1899). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXVI. p. 673.Google Scholar
Eyre, J. (1897). Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., IV. p. 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre, J. W. (1900). Brit. Med. Journ., II. p. 426.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. (1903). Journ. of Pathol. and Bacteriol., VIII. p. 448; and 1904, Ann. Rept. of M. O. H. Manchester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulerton, A. G. R. and Bonney, V. (1903). Trans. Path. Soc., LIV. p. 139.Google Scholar
Franke, E. (1898). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XXIV. p. 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (1904). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXXVI. p. 465.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. H. (1901). Thirty-first Annual Report of Local Government Board, p. 418.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. (1904). Journ. of Hygiene, IV. p. 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, A. S. (1901). Thompson Yates Laboratories Report, IV. p. 99.Google Scholar
Guerin, C. (1901). Ann. de. l'inst. Pasteur, XV. p. 941.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. (1904). Journ. of Infections Diseases, I. p. 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. and Horton, J. M. (1906). Journ. of Infectious Diseases, III. p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, F. C. (1901). Report of Ontario Agr. College.Google Scholar
Howard, T. W. (1894). Amer. Journ. Med. Sciences.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. N. V. and Goodall, E. (1902). Lancet, II. p. 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, E. (1897). Local Government Board Report, p. 267.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1901). Journ. of Hygiene, I. p. 85.Google Scholar
Klein, E. (1903). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXXIII, p. 488.Google Scholar
Kedrowski, (1901). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, XXXVII. p. 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, A. (1904). Journ. of Med. Research, XII. p. 475.Google Scholar
Kruse, W. and Pasquale, A. (1894). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, XVI. p. 1.Google Scholar
Lawson, A. (1899). Trans. Jenner Inst. Prev. Med., p. 56.Google Scholar
Levy, (1897). Archiv. f. Hygiene, XXX. p. 168.Google Scholar
Levy, E. and Fickler, H. (1900). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XXVI, p. 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, C. (1898). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XXIV. p. 416.Google Scholar
Macfadyen, A. and Hewlett, R. T. (1900). Trans. Path. Soc., LI. p. 13.Google Scholar
Martin, L. (1898). Ann. de l'inst. Pasteur, XII. p. 26.Google Scholar
Marzinowsky, E. J. (1900). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXVIII. p. 39.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, K. (1900). Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., XXVII. p. 640.Google Scholar
Neisser, E. (1888). Zeitschr. f. Hygiene, IV. p. 165.Google Scholar
Paffenholz, . (1895). Hygienische Rundschau, V. p. 733.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (1897). Deutsche med. Wochenschr., XXIII. p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, H. (1903). Wien. klin. Wochenschr., XVI. p. 762.Google Scholar
Robertson, W. F. and McRae, G. D. (v. 1905). Review of Neurology and Psychiatry, III. p. 321.Google Scholar
Robertson, W. F., McRae, G. D., and Jeffery, J. (V. 1903). Review of Neurology and Psychiatry, I. p. 305.Google Scholar
Ruediger, E. H. (1903). Trans. Chicago Path. Soc., IV. p. 45.Google Scholar
Smith, , Theobald, . (1896). Trans. Assoc. of Amer. Physicians.Google Scholar
Sanfelice, F. and Malato, V. E. (1903). Ann. d' Igiene Sperimentale, XIII. p. 1.Google Scholar
Spronck, C. H. H. (1898). Semaine Médicale, p. 393.Google Scholar
Teich, M. (1899). Centralbl. f. Backteriol., XXV. p. 756.Google Scholar
Warnecke, W. (1900). Münch. med. Wochenschr., p. 1412.Google Scholar
Williams, A. (1898). Proc. of New York Pathol. Soc., p. 170.Google Scholar
Williams, A. W. (1902). Journ. of Medical Research, p. 83.Google Scholar