Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-hf9kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-09T08:20:13.346Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

The effect of air ionization on the air-borne transmission of experimental Newcastle disease virus infections in chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Timo Estola
State Veterinary Medical Institute, Helsinki
Paavo mäkelä
Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki
Tapani Hovi
Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]


HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of artificial air-ionization on air-borne transmission of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection in chickens was studied in an isolated system consisting of two side-by-side cages with solid walls and a wire-gauze roof. During a 3-week observation period more than 90% of the uninoculated indicator chickens, housed in one of the cages, contracted the virus shed to the air by the NDV-inoculated, diseased birds in the neighbouring cage. This air-borne transmission of NDV was completely prevented by increasing the ion concentration in the test room by a constant negative corona discharge above the wire-gauze roof. On the other hand, spreading of the infection within a group of chickens housed in a single cage was not affected by air ionization.

These and other results suggest that artificial air-ionization may protect animals from certain air-borne infections by interfering with microbial aerosol formation and/or by facilitating their decay.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979


Estola, T. (1974). Isolation of a Finnish Newcastle disease virus with an exceptionally high thermostability. Avian Diseases 18, 274–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, A. P. & Reed, E. J. (1976). Biological impact of small air ions. Science, New York 193, 1209–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtimäki, M. & Graeffe, G. (1976). The effect of the ionization of air on aerosols in closed spaces. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Contamination Control, Copenhagen 2, 370–82.Google Scholar
MÄkelä, P., Ojajärvi, J., Lehtimäki, M. & Graeffe, G. (1979). Studies on the effects of ionization on bacterial aerosols in a burns-and-plastic-surgery unit. Journal of Hygiene 83, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, W. C. & Somerville, D. A. (1974). Microbiology of Human Skin. London: Saunders.Google Scholar