Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T16:51:22.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Estimation of the under-reporting rate for the surveillance of Escherichia coli O157[ratio ]H7 cases in Ontario, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2000

P. MICHEL
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College (OVC), University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
J. B. WILSON
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College (OVC), University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada Laboratory Centre for Disease Control (LCDC), Health Canada, Guelph
S. WAYNE MARTIN
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College (OVC), University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
R. C. CLARKE
Affiliation:
Guelph Laboratory, Health Canada, Guelph
S. A. McEWEN
Affiliation:
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College (OVC), University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
C. L. GYLES
Affiliation:
Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College (OVC), University of Guelph, Guelph
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two models estimating the proportion of Escherichia coli O157[ratio ]H7 cases not reported in the Ontario notifiable diseases surveillance system are described. The first model is a linear series of adjustments in which the total number of reported cases is corrected by successive under-reporting coefficients. The structure of the second model is based on a relative difference in the proportion of E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 cases which are hospitalized between the surveillance database and the underlying population.

Based on this analysis, the rate of under-reporting of symptomatic cases of E. coli O157[ratio ]H7 infection in Ontario ranges from 78 to 88% corresponding to a ratio of 1 reported case for approximately 4–8 symptomatic cases missed by the surveillance system. This study highlights the need to increase awareness among public health workers of the potential biases that may exist in the interpretation of routine surveillance data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press