Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-kc5xb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-14T10:21:48.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The molecular epidemiology of hepatitis E virus genotype 3 in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2024

Jamie Borlang
Affiliation:
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Donald Murphy
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada
Jennifer Harlow
Affiliation:
National Food Virology Reference Centre, Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Carla Osiowy
Affiliation:
National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Neda Nasheri*
Affiliation:
National Food Virology Reference Centre, Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Neda Nasheri; Email: neda.nasheri@hc-sc.gc.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Autochthonous hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is increasingly reported in industrialized countries and is mostly associated with zoonotic HEV genotype 3 (HEV-3). In this study, we examined the molecular epidemiology of 63 human clinical HEV-3 isolates in Canada between 2014 and 2022. Fifty-five samples were IgM positive, 45 samples were IgG positive and 44 were IgM and IgG positive. The majority of the isolates belong to the subtypes 3a, 3b, and 3j, with high sequence homology to Canadian swine and pork isolates. There were a few isolates that clustered with subtypes 3c, 3e, 3f, 3h, and 3g, and an isolate from chronic infection with a rabbit strain (3ra). Previous studies have demonstrated that the isolates from pork products and swine from Canada belong to subtypes 3a and 3b, therefore, domestic swine HEV is likely responsible for the majority of clinical HEV cases in Canada and further support the hypothesis that swine serve as the main reservoirs for HEV-3 infections. Understanding the associated risk of zoonotic HEV infection requires the establishment of sustainable surveillance strategies at the interface between humans, animals, and the environment within a One-Health framework.

Type
Short Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© Crown Copyright - Neda Nasheri, 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Infection with hepatitis E virus (HEV) is responsible for acute hepatitis leading to an estimated 3.3 million new symptomatic cases and over 44,000 deaths annually around the world [1]. HEV, species Paslahepevirus balayani, belongs to the genus Paslahepevirus of the family Hepeviridae [Reference Purdy2]. Eight genotypes have been defined, of which genotypes 1 and 2 only infect humans, and genotypes 3–6 infect mainly pigs and wild boars, with zoonotic spillover infections from genotypes 3 and 4 to humans and other mammals [Reference Ahmed and Nasheri3]. Genotypes 7 and 8 are mainly found in camelids [Reference Ahmed and Nasheri3]. Three clades are observed within HEV genotype 3 (HEV-3): group 1 (subtypes HEV-3e, f, and g), group 2 (HEV-3a, b, c, h, i, j, k, l, and m) and group 3, which includes rabbit (HEV-3ra) isolates. The frequency at which the various subtypes occur varies by region and can change over time ([Reference Smith4]).

The HEV genome is a single-stranded, positive sense RNA that encodes three open reading frames (ORFs): ORF 1 codes for the viral non-structural proteins including the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), ORF 2 codes for the major capsid protein, which is the main target for neutralizing antibodies, and the protein coded by ORF3 is believed to be involved in acquisition of lipid bilayers to form the quasi-envelope virion, allowing it to evade the immune system [Reference Kenney and Meng5].

During the last two decades, HEV-3 has become an emerging cause of viral hepatitis in Western industrialized countries as an increasing number of autochthonous HEV infections have been recognized in many European countries [Reference Hogema7]. Although HEV-3 has a wide host range, domesticated swine is considered to be the main reservoir and the most likely source of human infections [Reference Hogema7].

Infection with HEV-3 causes subclinical or acute self-limiting hepatitis [Reference Chauhan, Webb and Ferguson8, Reference Murrison and Sherman9]. However, chronic hepatitis is increasingly reported especially in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant recipients, patients with malignancies and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [Reference Velavan10, Reference Kamar11]. Furthermore, HEV infection can lead to extrahepatic complications, such as neurological complications, kidney injury, and haematological disorders [Reference Kamar12Reference Lhomme14].

The distribution of HEV subtypes in cohorts of patients with hepatic disease has been studied in a number of European countries such as the UK [Reference Oeser15], Italy [Reference De Sabato16], Germany [Reference Wang17], the Netherlands [Reference Koot18], and Spain [Reference Munoz-Chimeno19]. In Canada, HEV-3 infections in clinical cases and their molecular characteristics have not been described. However, several studies have reported the presence of HEV-3 genome in swine and cervid species as well as pork products [Reference Wilhelm20Reference Chatonnat23].

The seroprevalence of HEV among Canadian blood donors was 5.9% between 2013 and 2015 [Reference Fearon24], which is comparable with the United States at 7.7–12.5% [Reference Stramer25, Reference Delage26] and considerably lower than many regions in Europe [Reference Hartl27].

This study aims to characterize the clinical HEV-3 isolates submitted to the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) from across Canada between 2014 and 2022 and investigate the possible sources of transmission by comparing the genetic relatedness of these isolates. For this purpose, we merged the sequences obtained from human, animals and food isolates to trace the origin of HEV-3 clinical strains circulating in Canada.

Materials and methods

Clinical sample description

Specimens are routinely submitted to the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) of the Public Health Agency of Canada for serological and molecular testing of HEV as a standard of care. The NML is the reference diagnostic laboratory for Canada and provides HEV IgM/IgG serological testing, HEV RNA detection and quantification and HEV genotyping services to provincial public health laboratories (https://cnphi.canada.ca/gts/laboratory/1014). Serum or plasma samples are submitted based on suspicion of HEV infection. Only age and gender were available for the majority of reference requests, therefore travel and food history are also unknown.

HEV serological testing

Serum or plasma submitted to the NML for HEV serological analysis was tested using the Wantai HEV-IgM and HEV-IgG microplate enzyme immunoassays (Beijing Wantai BioPharm, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 10 μL specimen is added to microplates for solid-phase antibody capture by recombinant HEV protein (IgG assay) or anti-human IgM antibodies (IgM assay). Both assays involve a two-step incubation with enzyme-linked secondary antibodies allowing a chromogenic reaction to provide qualitative detection of antibodies. Sample reactivity is based on an assay absorbance to cutoff (A/CO) ≥ 1; non-reactive samples have an A/CO <1, and samples are considered borderline with A/CO between 0.9 and 1.5. Borderline specimens are re-tested in duplicate and tested for HEV RNA.

HEV RNA extraction and amplification

Viral RNA was extracted from 250 ul of serum/plasma using the Nuclisens EasyMag (Biomerieux) automated extraction system and eluted in 60 μL elution buffer. Extracted RNA was amplified using a previously described hemi-nested RT-PCR [Reference Drexler28], targeting a 338 bp fragment of the RdRp region of HEV ORF1. Amplicons were purified using Amicon®Ultra filters (Millipore) and submitted for sequencing with the appropriate primers.

Pork isolates description

The Canadian pork isolates included in this study have been described previously [Reference Schemmerer29]. Briefly, 15 HEV-3 isolates from pork paté from the 2014–2015 surveillance study referenced above were subjected to RNA extraction using TRI Reagent® and 1-bromo-3-choloropropane (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by RNA concentration using Dynabeads-Oligo (dT)25 (Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturer’s instructions for purifying mRNA from total RNA. RNA was eluted in 25 μL of DNase/RNase-free water by heating the beads at 90°C for 2 min. The extracted RNA was subjected to RT-PCR using the primers and conditions described in [Reference Drexler28].

HEV sequencing

HEV RT-PCR positive samples were further characterized by amplicon sequencing. The PCR products were gel purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and sequenced in both directions with the nested PCR primers using the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and separated on a model 3730xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Nucleotide sequences of PCR products were analyzed using BioEdit software (bioedit.software.informer.com). HEV sequences are available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/ at accession numbers OR978137–OR978214.

Phylogenetic analysis

Partial RdRp nucleotide sequences were aligned with select GenBank reference sequences representing HEV-3 subtypes from human and isolates from pork and swine [Reference Smith4] using the Multiple Sequence Comparison by Log-Expectation (MUSCLE) [Reference Edgar31] and trimmed to remove primer sequences. Maximum likelihood analysis of the ORF1 region was performed using MEGA X [Reference Tamura32] with 1,000 bootstrap replications. Tree visualization and annotation were performed with MEGA X.

Results and discussion

Demographic profile of HEV-3 infected Canadians

From 2014 to 2022, the NML detected 63 unique cases of active HEV-3 infection (i.e., HEV RNA positive). Fifty-six of 63 specimens had associated serological data (Figure 1 and Table 1), with 94.6% (53/56) of the cases positive for HEV IgM. The majority of HEV-3 cases were male (71.2%; 42/59 having associated data) and the median and mean age, respectively, were 50 and 51 years (range 18–83 years). HEV-3 cases were observed among six provinces of Canada between 2014 and 2022 (Table 1). Of note, of the three cases that were HEV IgM negative, further information was provided for two cases, indicating they were immunosuppressed.

Figure 1. Serological data for the clinical samples, which were positive for HEV-3 RNA. ‘n’ in brackets indicates the number of individuals.

Table 1. HEV RNA positive study population by demographic and clinical characteristics, Canada 2014–2022

Partial data based on RNA positivity for approximately 6 months indicated that 16 isolates belonged to chronic infection and the information regarding immunosuppression was available for 11 patients (Table 1). None of the replicate sequences were included in the phylogenetic analysis.

It is noteworthy that our observations regarding the sex (mostly male) and median age (≥50) in Canadian HEV-3 infected patients, are consistent with the trends observed in other studies from Europe and Japan [Reference Koot18, Reference Munoz-Chimeno19, Reference Sugiyama30].

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree constructed based on the partial ORF1 sequences from 62 HEV-3 (non-3ra) cases revealed that the majority of the clinical isolates are clustered with HEV-3 group 2 (subtypes a, b, j; Figure 1). There is 100% identity between two isolates from pork products (BMH-096D and BMH-047D) and two clinical isolates, H16-5242 and H15-2036 while there is 99.6% identity between those pork isolates and H18-1523, H16-2977, H15-4984, H15-1537, and H14-4574.

Another cluster of clinical sequences that show high similarity to pork isolates are H18-0125, H20-2424, H17-1749, H17-4401, H20-3946, and H19-5416, which are 96.25–97% identical to BMH-034.

Although H17-4115, H15-4981, H14-0583, and H20-2519 are not clustered with the pork isolates, they show high similarity to subtype ‘3j’ reference AY115488, which is a swine isolate from Canada. The same is true for H14-0577, H14-2436, H20-2533, and H15-1508, which are clustered with KJ507956, a swine isolate from Quebec. One isolate, H21-2846, is clustered with the subtype 3c, which is dominant in Europe [Reference Schemmerer33] and could be associated with travel or the consumption of imported meat.

HEV-3 group 1 (subtypes e, f, and g) are mostly prevalent in Europe [Reference Schemmerer33]. For example, the majority of infections in France belong to clades e, f, and g [Reference Nicot34] and infections in Italy are mostly associated with subtypes 3f [Reference De Sabato16]. The Canadian pork isolates mostly belong to subtypes 3a and 3b [Reference Mykytczuk22, Reference Chatonnat23]; therefore, the presence of a few clinical isolates in Canada that belong to subtypes 3c, 3e, 3f, and 3g could be attributed to the consumption of imported meat products, or possibly travel to endemic regions of Europe. An extensive phylogenetic analysis of HEV-3 isolated from farmed pigs in Europe has also revealed that subtypes 3c, 3e, 3f, and 3g are most common, while there are only a few isolates that belong to 3a, and 3b [Reference De Sabato35]. Furthermore, it has been indicated that subtypes e, f, g are associated with a more severe disease presentation [Reference Schemmerer29]. Interestingly, the majority of HEV-3 clinical cases reported in Japan belong to subtypes a and b [Reference Sugiyama30]. Further epidemiological analyses are required to elucidate the similarity in HEV-3 isolates between distant regions.

Sporadic cases of human infections with rabbit HEV-3 (HEV-3ra) have been reported in Asia and Europe [Reference Klink36]. The majority of HEV-3ra infections in humans have occurred in immunosuppressed patients, demonstrating the zoonotic risk of HEV-3ra [Reference Klink36]. Herein, we also identified one HEV-3ra sequence isolated from a patients infected with H21-5187 QC (HEV IgM+ IgG+) who was later determined to have a chronic HEV infection as persistent HEV RNA was detected from 2021 to 2022 (Figure 2). There was no nucleotide change between the sequences obtained within this time span (data not shown). This isolate shows homology to sequences from France; however, the number of HEV-3ra sequences available from GenBank is limited and further molecular epidemiological studies are required for higher-resolution phylogenetic analysis. Several studies have shown the presence of HEV-3ra in commercial rabbits in Ontario (5% prevalence; [Reference Xie37]) and studied rabbits in Virginia, USA (49%; [Reference Cossaboom38]). The targeted HEV genome region in those studies was not ORF1 and therefore could not be included in our phylogenetic analysis. However, these findings demonstrate that HEV-3ra is prevalent among rabbit populations in North America and could be the source of the clinical cases described here.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial ORF1 region of HEV-3 strains of human or animal origin. The maximum likelihood tree was produced from the 338 bp fragment of the RdRp region, using 1,000 bootstrap replications. Bootstraps values >50 are indicated at their respective nodes The 63 clinical sequences from this study are indicated by blue circles and the pork isolates by red circles. The reference sequences are identified by black triangle. The accession numbers, country of origin and the year of isolation are also indicated.

Consumption of certain pork products is currently considered a significant risk factor for developing HEV infection in developed countries [Reference Treagus39] and our data also indicate that HEV-3 infections in Canada are highly associated with HEV present in pigs and contaminated pork products. The source of infection observed in this study may arise through occupational exposure to infected swine or the consumption of contaminated pork products. Therefore, this study provides an insight into the transmission route of autochthonous HEV infections in Canada. HEV seroprevalence has also been reported in cervids such as caribou, white-tailed deer and mule deer in Canada [Reference Weger21]; however, no RNA was detected, therefore no phylogenetic analysis could be performed.

In a zoonotic infection such as HEV-3, it is crucial to recognize the interconnections between humans, animals, and their shared environment and to implement a One-Health multisectoral approach to achieve optimal outcomes. It is estimated that globally, nearly 13% of domestic swine and 9.5% of wild boars are actively infected with HEV-3, and HEV-3 RNA is present in 5.5%–15.5% of global pork products [Reference Li40]. At such high prevalence, the control measures against autochthonous HEV-3 infections require continuous collaborations among health authorities, veterinarians, clinicians and the food industry. For example, while several mitigation strategies such as treatments with organic acids and high-pressure processing are not completely effective against HEV in food products [Reference Nasheri41, Reference McLEOD42], cooking to a minimum internal temperature of 72°C for at least 20 min is likely to inactivate HEV present in food matrices [Reference Treagus39]. Additionally, improving sanitation and hygiene at pig farms and slaughterhouses has been linked to better outcomes in HEV-3 control [Reference Meester43].

A limitation of this study is the limited number of pork and swine isolates that could be included in the phylogenetic analysis. One reason for this is that the majority of pork and swine isolates in public sequence databases are specific to the ORF-2 region, which is not the region targeted in this study. Also, HEV is not a nationally reportable disease, although it is reportable at the provincial level in several provinces; thus, its prevalence is most likely under-reported, since Canadian physicians may not consider HEV as a possibility in their patients. Therefore, the number of clinical infections described in this study does not necessarily represent the full picture of HEV-3 incidence in Canada.

In summary, this study demonstrates the dominance of group 2 subtypes (3a, 3b, 3j) among HEV-3 strains observed in Canada, which are also reflected in the swine isolates (Figure 2). However, sporadic infections with other genotypes such as 3c, 3f, 3g, 3ra have also been observed, while no isolate clustered with 3l or 3m subtypes. Future epidemiological studies with the inclusion of clinical, food, and environmental isolates could elucidate the potential role of HEV subtypes and strains on acute hepatitis, hospitalization, and chronic courses of HEV infections.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial ORF1 region of HEV-3ra strains. The maximum likelihood tree was produced from the 338 bp fragment of the RdRp region, using the 1,000 bootstrap replications. The clinical sequence from this study is indicated by blue circle.

Overall, the results from this study provide a direct comparison of HEV-3 subtype distribution in humans and animals in Canada. Therefore, this work may pioneer a thorough exploration of the dynamics of HEV-3 transmissibility at the human-animal interface, based on a larger availability of shared HEV results in North America.

Data availability statement

The genomic data are all available at the NCBI repository as described in Materials and Methods under accession numbers OR978137–OR978214. Further epidemiological data of the de-identified cases could be requested from the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge and thank all Provincial Public Health and hospital laboratories that submitted specimens for HEV testing over the period 2014–2022. The authors would also thank Dr. Annika Flint for her support in bioinformatic analysis and the review of the manuscript.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: C.O., N.N.; Data curation: C.O., J.B., J.H., N.N.; Funding acquisition: C.O., N.N.; Investigation: C.O., D.M., J.B., J.H., N.N.; Methodology: C.O., J.B., J.H.; Project administration: C.O., D.M.; Resources: C.O., D.M.; Supervision: C.O., N.N.; Writing – original draft: C.O., N.N.; Writing – review & editing: C.O., D.M.; Formal analysis: D.M., J.B., J.H.; Software: J.B., N.N.; Validation: J.B.; Visualization: J.B., N.N.

Ethical standard

The National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) is the national reference laboratory for diagnostic testing and surveillance of viral hepatitis in Canada. Specimens are routinely received for HEV serological and genotype testing as standard of care. Thus specimens received for diagnostic testing represent patients presenting with symptoms to their physician, presumed to be infected with HEV. Only age and gender were available for the majority of reference requests. All research was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

Hepatitis E. (2023) Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-e (accessed 5 October 2023).Google Scholar
Purdy, MA, et al. (2022) ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Hepeviridae 2022. The Journal of General Virology 103, 1778. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, R and Nasheri, N (2023) Animal reservoirs for hepatitis E virus within the Paslahepevirus genus. Veterinary Microbiology 278, 109618. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2022.109618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, DB, et al. (2020) Update: Proposed reference sequences for subtypes of hepatitis E virus (species Orthohepevirus A). The Journal of General Virology 101, 692698. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.001435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenney, SP and Meng, X (2019) Hepatitis E virus genome structure and replication strategy. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 9, a031724. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a031724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aspinall, EJ, et al. (2017) Hepatitis E virus infection in Europe: Surveillance and descriptive epidemiology of confirmed cases, 2005 to 2015. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen sur les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin 22, 30561. http://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.26.30561.Google ScholarPubMed
Hogema, BM, et al. (2021) Comparison of hepatitis E virus sequences from humans and swine, the Netherlands, 1998–2015. Viruses 13, 1265. http://doi.org/10.3390/v13071265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauhan, A, Webb, G and Ferguson, J (2019) Clinical presentations of Hepatitis E: A clinical review with representative case histories. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology 43, 649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murrison, LB and Sherman, KE (2017) The enigma of hepatitis E virus. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 13, 484491.Google ScholarPubMed
Velavan, TP, et al. (2021) Hepatitis E: An update on one health and clinical medicine. Liver International: Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 41, 14621473. http://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamar, N, et al. (2015) Hepatitis E virus: Chronic infection, extra-hepatic manifestations, and treatment. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology 39, 2027. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2014.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamar, N, et al. (2014) Hepatitis E virus infection. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 27, 116138. http://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00057-13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrin, HB, et al. (2015) Neurologic disorders in immunocompetent patients with autochthonous acute hepatitis E. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21, 1928. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2111.141789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lhomme, S, et al. (2020) Clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and treatment of hepatitis E virus infections. Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oeser, C, et al. (2019) Epidemiology of hepatitis E in England and Wales: A 10-year retrospective surveillance study, 2008-2017. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 220, 802810. http://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sabato, L, et al. (2020) Molecular characterization of HEV genotype 3 in Italy at human/animal interface. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, B, et al. (2018) Comprehensive molecular approach for characterization of hepatitis E virus genotype 3 variants. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 56, e01686. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01686-17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koot, H, et al. (2015) Frequent hepatitis E in the Netherlands without traveling or immunosuppression. Journal of Clinical Virology: The Official Publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology 62, 3840. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2014.11.020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz-Chimeno, M, et al. (2022) Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 microbiological surveillance by the Spanish reference laboratory: Geographic distribution and phylogenetic analysis of subtypes from 2009 to 2019. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen sur les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin 27, 2100542. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilhelm, B, et al. (2014) Survey of Canadian retail pork chops and pork livers for detection of hepatitis E virus, norovirus, and rotavirus using real time RT-PCR. International Journal of Food Microbiology 185, 3340. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.05.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weger, S, et al. (2017) Hepatitis E virus Seroprevalence in free-ranging deer in Canada. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 64, 10081011. http://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mykytczuk, O, et al. (2017) Prevalence and molecular characterization of the hepatitis E virus in retail pork products marketed in Canada. Food and Environmental Virology 9, 208218. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-017-9281-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatonnat, E, et al. (2023) High occurrence of hepatitis E virus in raw pork liver and pork liver pâté produced in the Canadian province of Quebec. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 7, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, MA, et al. (2017) Hepatitis E in Canadian blood donors. Transfusion 57, 14201425. http://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stramer, SL, et al. (2016) Hepatitis E virus: Seroprevalence and frequency of viral RNA detection among US blood donors. Transfusion 56, 481488. http://doi.org/10.1111/trf.13355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delage, G, et al. (2019) Hepatitis E Virus infection in blood donors and risk to patients in the United States and Canada. Transfusion Medicine Reviews 33, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartl, J, et al. (2016) Hepatitis E Seroprevalence in Europe: A meta-analysis. Viruses 8, 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/v8080211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drexler, JF, et al. (2012) Bats worldwide carry hepatitis E virus-related viruses that form a putative novel genus within the family Hepeviridae. Journal of Virology 86, 91349147. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00800-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schemmerer, M, et al. (2019) Isolation of subtype 3c, 3e and 3f-like hepatitis E virus strains stably replicating to high viral loads in an optimized cell culture system. Viruses 11, 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11060483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, R, et al. (2023) Nationwide epidemiologic and genetic surveillance of hepatitis E in Japan, 2014–2021. Journal of Medical Virology 95, e28886. http://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgar, RC (2004). MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 17921797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K, et al. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 27252729; https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schemmerer, M, et al. (2022) Molecular epidemiology and genotype-specific disease severity of hepatitis E virus infections in Germany, 2010-2019. Emerging Microbes & Infections 11, 17541763. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2091479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicot, F, et al. (2021) Classification of the zoonotic hepatitis E virus genotype 3 into distinct subgenotypes. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 634430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.634430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Sabato, L, et al. (2023) Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis E virus (HEV) strains from pigs farmed in eight European countries between 2020 and 2022. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 2023, 2806835. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2806835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klink, P, et al. (2023) Molecular characterisation of a rabbit hepatitis E virus strain detected in a chronically HEV-infected individual from Germany. One Health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 16, 100528. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100528.Google Scholar
Xie, X, et al. (2017) Prevalence of lapine rotavirus, astrovirus, and hepatitis E virus in Canadian domestic rabbit populations. Veterinary Microbiology 208, 146149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.07.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cossaboom, CM, et al. (2011) Hepatitis E virus in rabbits, Virginia, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17, 20472049; https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.02414-12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treagus, S, et al. (2021) The foodborne transmission of hepatitis E virus to humans. Food and Environmental Virology 13, 127145. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-021-09461-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, P, et al. (2021) Estimating the global prevalence of hepatitis E virus in swine and pork products. One Health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 14, 100362. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100362.Google ScholarPubMed
Nasheri, N, et al. (2020) Evaluation of high-pressure processing in inactivation of the hepatitis E virus. Frontiers in Microbiology 11, 461. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLEOD, M, et al. (2022) Examining the effect of organic acids on inactivation of hepatitis E virus. Journal of Food Protection 85, 16901695. http://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-22-164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meester, M, et al. (2023) Farm biosecurity measures to prevent hepatitis E virus infection in finishing pigs on endemically infected pig farms. One Health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 16, 100570. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100570.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Serological data for the clinical samples, which were positive for HEV-3 RNA. ‘n’ in brackets indicates the number of individuals.

Figure 1

Table 1. HEV RNA positive study population by demographic and clinical characteristics, Canada 2014–2022

Figure 2

Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial ORF1 region of HEV-3 strains of human or animal origin. The maximum likelihood tree was produced from the 338 bp fragment of the RdRp region, using 1,000 bootstrap replications. Bootstraps values >50 are indicated at their respective nodes The 63 clinical sequences from this study are indicated by blue circles and the pork isolates by red circles. The reference sequences are identified by black triangle. The accession numbers, country of origin and the year of isolation are also indicated.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis based on partial ORF1 region of HEV-3ra strains. The maximum likelihood tree was produced from the 338 bp fragment of the RdRp region, using the 1,000 bootstrap replications. The clinical sequence from this study is indicated by blue circle.