Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-r7bls Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T17:55:50.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Organisms Serologically Related to S. Enteritidis Gärtner. I.: The Dublin and Tokyo Types of Salmonella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. Bruce White
P. Bruce White
Affiliation:
(From the Bacteriological Department, National Institute for Medical Research.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pioneer studies seemed to resolve the organisms of the Salmonella group into four types or groups sharply marked off from one another by their agglutinative reactions: S. typhosus, S. paratyphosus A, S. enteritidis Gärtner and a “paratyphoid B group.” Later work has shown the heterogeneity of the old paratyphoid B group, which approximates to what we may now term the series of diphasic types; and further that S. typhosus and S. paratyphosus A, far from standing in serological isolation, display striking and peculiar relationships to certain members of this series: the flagellar antigen of the typhoid bacillus closely resembles that of the specific phase of the diphasic Stanley type, less closely that of the Bombay type; both in flagellar and somatic antigen S. paratyphosus A coincides with the specific phase of the diphasic Sendai type (typical paratyphus A bacillus of Aoki and Sakai, 1926).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , February 1930 , pp. 443 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

References

REFERENCES

Aoki, K. and Sakai, (1926). Zentralbl. Bakt. Abt. I, Orig. 98, 9.Google Scholar
Hecht-Johansen, A. (1923). Classification of strains belonging to the Typhoid-Paratyphoid Group of Bacteria. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Opitz, H. (1919). Monatschr. Kinderheilk. 15, 383.Google Scholar
Peckham, C. F. (1923). J. Hygiene, 22, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesch, K. L. (1926). Zentralbl. Bakt. Abt. I, Orig. 98, 22.Google Scholar
Sakai, (1925). Zentralbl. Bakt. Abt. I, Orig.. 95, 152.Google Scholar
Stuart, G. and Krikorian, K. S. (1926). J. Hygiene, 25, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symmers, W. St C. and Wilson, W. J. (1909). J. Hygiene. 13, 251.Google Scholar
Weil, E. and Felix, A. (1920). Zeitschr. f. Immunitätsf. 29, 69.Google Scholar
White, P.Bruce (1925). Sp. Rep. Ser., Med. Res. Coun. London, No. 91.Google Scholar
White, P.Bruce (1926). Sp. Rep. Ser., Med. Res. Coun. No. 103.Google Scholar