Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T03:09:16.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reaction of Complement Fixation in Foot-and-Mouth Disease as a means of identifying the Different Types of Virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. Ciuca
A. Ciuca
Affiliation:
(From the Lister Institute, London.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Notwithstanding several efforts, a satisfactory method of serological diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease has not been arrived at. This uncertainty of serological methods delayed the discovery of the plurality of type of the virus, although the observations of epizootics and the irregular results obtained by active and passive immunisation suggested multiplicity of type. Stimulated by such observations, Vallée and Carré (1922) experimented with two viruses of foot-and-mouth disease, one of which was of German and the other of French origin. They were able to show by experimental infection, confirmed by subsequent testing for active immunity, that cases of foot-and-mouth disease with the same clinical course and symptoms could be caused by two distinct types of virus. These they called A (Allemand) and O (Oise). The only difference between these two types was their inability to produce reciprocal immunity. The existence of more than one type of virus has been confirmed in England by Stockman and Minett (1926), and by Bedson, Maitland and Burbury (1927); in Germany, by Waldmann and Trautwein (1926), and Trautwein (1927); in France, by Lebailly (1926), Olitsky (1927), and in Sweden, by Magnusson and Hermansson (1926).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , February 1929 , pp. 325 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929

References

REFERENCES

Ascoli, A. (1910). Über die Meiostagminreaction bei der Maul- und Klauenseuche. Zeitschr. f. Infektionskr. der Haustiere, 8, 308.Google Scholar
Ascoli, A. (1910). La reazione Meiostagmica nell' afta epizootica. Clin. Veter. p. 206.Google Scholar
Bedson, S. P., Maitland, H. B. and Burbury, Y. M. (1927). Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Committee, Second Progress Report, London, p. 97.Google Scholar
Bedson, S. P., Maitland, H. B. and Burbury, Y. M. (1927). Further Observations on Foot-and-Mouth Disease. J. of Compar. Path. and Therap. 40, 79.Google Scholar
Burbury, Y. M. (1928). Determination of the Immunological Types to which different Strains of Virus belong. Third Report of the Foot and Mouth Disease Research Committee, Appendix II, p. 65.Google Scholar
Ernst, W. (1922). Weitere Mitteilungen zur Maul- und Klauenseuchefrage. München. tierärztl. Wochenschr. p. 550.Google Scholar
Favero, F. (1914). Sulla presenza di una Sensibilizzatrice antiaftosa. Clin. Veter. p. 327.Google Scholar
Lebailly, Ch. (1925). Rapport à l' Institut des recherches agronomiques, Paris. (Publication du Ministère de l'Agriculture.)Google Scholar
Lebailly, Ch. (1926). Expériences concernant le virus aphteux. C.R. Acad. Sci. 183, 578.Google Scholar
Levaditi, , Nicolau, and Galloway, (1926). Les affinitéstissulaires du virus aphteux. C.R. Soc. Biol. 95, 1230.Google Scholar
Lourens, L. (1909). La Sérothérapie, la Sérophylaxie et la Vaccination de la fièvre aphteuse et sa Valeur au Point de Vue de la Police Sanitaire. IX Congrès Internat. de Méd. Vétér. Haye, 3.Google Scholar
Magnusson, H. and Hermansson, K. A. (1926). Einige Beobachtungen über die Maul- und Klauenseuche in Schweden. Acta Pathol. u. Microbiol. Scandinav. 3, 737.Google Scholar
Mezinescu, O., Baroni, V. and Calinescu, J. (1923). Recherches expérimentales sur la fièvre aphteuse. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 37, 1057.Google Scholar
Minett, (1927). J. of Compar. Path. and Therap. 40, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olitsky, P. K. (1927). Summary of Observations of the Commission to Study Foot-and-Mouth Disease. J. Amer. Vet. Assoc. 70, 926.Google Scholar
Olitsky, , Traum, and Schoening, (1928). Report of the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Commission of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 76, p. 98.Google Scholar
Sachelarie, , Boquet, and Urbain, (1928). Sur la pluralité du virus aphteux. Rapport de l'Office International des Épizooties. Paris, 1928, Rapport 1., p. 5.Google Scholar
Stockman, S. and Minett, F. (1926). Researches on the Virus of Foot-and-Mouth Disease. J. of Compar. Path. and Therap. 39, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockman, S. and Minett, F. (1926). Experiments on Foot-and-Mouth Disease. J. of Compar. Path. and Therap. 39, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockman, S. and Minett, F. (1925). Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Committee, First Progress Report, H.M. Stationery Office, London, p. 19.Google Scholar
Titze, C. (1922). Die Züchtung des Erregers der Maul- und Klauenseuche. Berlin. tierärztl. Wochenschr. p. 44.Google Scholar
Trautwein, K. (1927). Die Plurlität des Maul- und Klauenseuchevirus. Arch. f. wiss. u. prakt. Tierheilk. 56, 505.Google Scholar
Urbain, Ach. (1927). La réaction de fixation appliquée au diagnostic de certaines maladies microbiennes ou parasitaires communes à l'homme et aux animaux. Traité. Édition de la Revue de Pathol. Comparée et d'Hygiène Générale. Paris, 1927, p. 174.Google Scholar
Vallée, H. and Carré, H. (1922). Sur l'Immunité anti-aphteuse. C.R. Acad. Sci. 174, 207.Google Scholar
Vallée, H. and Carré, H. (1922). Sur la pluralité du virus aphteux. C.R. Acad. Sci. 174, 1498.Google Scholar
Vallée, H. and Carré, H. (1928). Sur la pluralité du virus aphteux. Rapport de l'Office International des Épizooties. Paris, R. 1.Google Scholar
Vallée, H., Carré, H. and Rinjard, (1925). Sur l'Immunisation antiaphteuse. Bull. Soc. Centrale de Méd. Vétér. p. 297.Google Scholar
Waldmann, O. and Trautwein, K. (1926). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Pluralität des Maul- und Klauenseuchevirus. Berlin. tierärztl. Wochenschr. 42, 569.Google Scholar
Waldmann, O. and Trautwein, K.(1923). Versuche zur aktiven Immunisierung gegen Maul- und Klauenseuche. Arch. f. wiss. u. prakt. Tierheilk. 50, 229.Google Scholar