Skip to main content

Sylvatic plague studies. The vector efficiency of nine species of fleas compared with Xenopsylla cheopis

  • Albert Lawrence Burroughs (a1)

All fleas used in this study were collected in the field and except for Pulex irritans were cultured in the laboratory. The ten species studied were Xenopsylla cheopis, Nosopsyllus fasciatus, Orchopeas sexdentatus sexdentatus, Opisodasys-nesiotus, Megabothris abantis, Malaraeus telchinum, Diamanus montanus, Echidnophaga gallinacea, Pulex irritans and Oropsylla idahoensis.

All fleas transmitted in individual feeding studies with the exception of the latter two species, which transmitted en masse. Echidnophaga gallinacea could not be fed periodically as were the other fleas because of its tick-like feeding habits. Consequently, the vector efficiency obtained for this species is not strictly comparable to that found for the other species.

The transmission data obtained from individual flea feeding studies was analysed statistically to estimate the expected number of transmissions per flea of each species. These values are obtained as intervals which have a 90% probability of containing the true value. The true vector efficiency of Xenopsylla cheopis was found to be 0·660 ± 0·234 (expected transmissions per flea), that of Nosopsyllus fasciatus to be 0·213 ± 0·157, and that of Orchopeas sexdentatus sexdentatus to be 0·170 ± 0·138. Opisodasys nesiotus, Megabothris abantis, Malaraeus telchinum and Diamanus montanus transmitted very inefficiently.

Experimental evidence was obtained that different strains of a species of flea may differ markedly in their biological vector capacity. In contrast to results obtained in this study, Wheeler & Douglas found Diamanus montanus to be an exceptionally good vector; in their studies it proved to be an even more efficient vector than Xenopsylla cheopis. The strain of Diamanus montanus employed by them came from an area widely separated from that in which the strain used in the present studies was originally collected.

Since many blocked fleas did not transmit it is probable that the experimentally determined vector efficiencies are lower than they would be in nature, where the blocked flea has constant access to a host and hence greater opportunity to feed.

Attempts to determine the number of organisms regurgitated by a blocked flea during its attempt to feed did not prove entirely satisfactory, but gave an indication that the number may be at times from 11,000 to 24,000 organisms. The technique consisted of feeding a blocked flea on the shaved abdomen of a mouse (later on the ear), then immediately doing a biopsy on the area around and including the bite wound. This biopsy material was then finely ground and plated on a sensitive bacteriological medium. Some mice upon which biopsies were performed nevertheless contracted plague and died. This must lead to the conclusion that an infective flea may deposit organisms directly into the capillaries and that the primary stage of infection resulting from a flea bite is frequently bacteraemia.

Hide All
Bacot A. W. (1915). Further notes on the mechanism of the transmission of plague by fleas. J. Hyg., Camb., Plague Supplement 4, 774–6.
Bacot A. W. & Martin C. J. (1914). Observations on the mechanism of the transmission of plague by fleas. J. Hyg., Camb., Plague Supplement 3, 423–39.
Blanc G. & Baltazard M. (1942). On the mechanism of the transmission of plague by Xenopsylla cheopis. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 136, 646–7.
St John Brooks R. (1917). The influence of saturation deficiency and of temperature on the course of epidemic plague. J. Hyg., Camb., Plague Supplement 5, 881–99.
Burroughs A. L. (1944). The flea Malaraeus telchinum a vector of P. pestis. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 55, 1011.
Bytchov V. A. (1935). On the role of fleas in the conservation and propagation of plague bacilli (Assistants dissertation). Parasites, transmetteurs, animaux vénimeux. Recueil des travaux dédié aux 25meanniversaire scientifique du Professor Eugéne Pavlosky, Moscou, pp. 89126. French summary, pp. 126–8.
Clemow F. G. (1900). Remarks on plague in the lower animals. Brit. Med. J. 1, 1141–6.
de la Barrera J. M. (1939). Contribucion al conocimiento de la peste selvatica en la Argentina; caracteres de brote de Mendoza en 1937. Rev. d. Inst. bact. 8, 431–54.
Douglas J. R. & Wheeler C. M. (1941). Sylvatic plague studies. I. A convenient individual mouse jar. J. Infect. Dis. 69, 2931.
Douglas J. R. & Wheeler C. M. (1943). Sylvatic plague studies. II. The fate of Pasteurella pestis in the flea. J. Infect. Dis. 72, 1830.
Eskey C. R. (1938). Fleas as vectors of plague. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth, 28, 1305–10.
Eskey C. R. & Haas V. H. (1940). Plague in the western part of the United States. Bull. U.S. Publ. Hlth Serv. no. 254, pp. 183.
Evseeva V. E. & Firsov I. P. (1932). The suslik fleas as reservoirs of plague bacilli during the winter. Vestn. mikr. epidemiol. parazitol. 11, pp. 281–3. English summary, p. 283.
Fourie L. (1938). The endemic focus of plague. S. Afr. Med. J. 12, 352–9. Referred to by Meyer (1942).
Gauthier J. C. & Raybaud A. (1902). Sur le rôle des parasites du rat dans la transmission de la peste. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 54, 1947.
Gauthier J. C. & Raybaud A. (1903). Recherches expérimentales sur le rôle des parasites du rat dans la transmission de la peste. Rev. Hyg. Police Sanit. 25, 426–38.
George P. V. & Webster W. J. (1934). Plague inquiry in the Cumbum Valley, South India. Indian J. Med. Res. 22, 77103.
Girard G. (1943). Les ectoparasites de l'homme dans l'epidémiologie de la peste. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 36, nos. 1–2, pp. 441.
Golov D. A. & Ioff I. G. (1925). On the question of the role of the fleas of spermophiles in the epidemiology of plague. Vestn. mikr. epidemiol. parazitol. 4, pp. 1948. French summary, pp. 131–7.
Goyle A. N. (1927). Experiments on the transmission of plague by Xenopsylla cheopis and X. astia. Far East. Ass. Trop. Med. Trans. Seventh Congr. 2, 35–9.
Goyle A. N. (1928). Experiments on the transmission of plague by fleas of the genus Xenopsylla (cheopis and astia) with a discussion on the flea species distribution in its relation to the incidence of plague. Indian J. Med. Res. 15, 837–60.
Hirst L. F. (1923). On the transmission of plague by fleas of the genus Xenopsylla. Indian J. Med. Res. 10, 789820.
Hirst L. F. (1925 a). Plague fleas with special reference to the Milroy Lectures. J. Hyg., Camb., 24, 116.
Hirst L. F. (1925 b). Researches on the parasitology of plague. Part II. The transmission of plague by the blood-sucking ectoparasites of rats with special reference to Xenopsylla astia and X. cheopis. Ceylon J. Sci., Sect. D, Med. Sci., 1, 167–99.
Indian Plague Commission (1906). Reports on plague investigations in India. I. Experiments upon the transmission of plague by fleas. J. Hyg., Camb., 6, 425–82.
Indian Plague Commission (1907). Further observations on the transmission of plague by fleas, with special reference to the fate of the plague bacillus in the body of the rat flea (P. cheopis). J. Hyg., Camb., 7, 395420.
Indian Plague Commission (1908). The mechanism by means of which the flea clears itself of plague bacilli. J. Hyg., Camb., 8, 260–5.
Indian Plague Commisson (1908). On the seasonal prevalence of plague in India. J. Hyg., Camb., 8, Plague Number, pp. 266301.
Ioff I. G. (1941). Problems in the Ecology of Fleas in Relation to their Epidemiological Importance. Ordjhonikidze Regional Anti-Plague Experiment Station, Ordjhonikidze Regional Publishing House, Pyatigorsk. Translated by Mary H. Garlin, O.S.R.D. Liaison Office, New York. 133 double-spaced typewritten pages, and 332 references.
Jellison W. J. & Good N. E. (1942). Index to the literature of Siphonaptera of North America. Bull. Nat. Inst. Hlth. no. 178, pp. 1193.
Jellison W. J. & Kohls G. M. (1936). Distribution and hosts of the human flea, Pulex irritans Linn., in Montana and other western states. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash., 51, 842–4.
Kitasato S. (1894). The bacillus of bubonic plague (preliminary notice). Lancet, 2, 428.
Lagrange E. (1926). Concerning the discovery of the plague bacillus. J. Trop. Med. 29, 299302.
Glen Liston W. (1924). The Milroy Lectures, 1924. On the plague. II. The etiology of plague. Brit. Med. J. 1, 950–4.
McCoy G. W. & Wherry W. B. (1909). Subacute plague in man due to ground-squirrel infection. J. Infect. Dis. 6, 670–5.
Martini E. (1923). Lehrbuch der Medizinischen Entomologie, p. 140. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
Meyer K. F. (1938). The role of the infected and the infective flea in the spread of sylvatic plague. V. jschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich, 83, Beiblatt no. 30, pp. 160–9, Festschrift Karl Hescheler.
Meyer K. F. (1941). The ecology of plague. Medicine, 21, 143–74.
Meyer K. F. (1942). The known and the unknown in plague. Amer. J. Trop. Med. 22, 936.
Meyer K. F. (1943). Plague. Med. Clin. N. Amer., New York Number, pp. 745–65.
Meyer K. F. (1946). The relation of diseases in the lower animals to human welfare, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 47, 429–67. (This paper is in a symposium, pp. 351–76.)
Mitchell J. A. (1927). Plague in South Africa. Publ. S. Afr. Inst. Med. Res. 3, 97–8.
Ogata M. (1897). Ueber die Pestepidemie in Formosa. Zbl. Bakt. 21, 769–74.
Roux M. E. (1897). II. Sur la peste bubonique. Essais de traitement par le sérum antipesteux, à propos d'une note du Dr Yersin, médecin de 2e classe des Colonies, directeur de l'lnstitut Pasteur de Nha-Trang. Bull. Acad. méd. 37, 3 série, pp. 91–9.
Sikes E. K. (1931). Notes on breeding fleas, with reference to humidity and feeding. Parasitology, 23, 243–9.
Simond P. L. (1898). The propagation of plague. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 12, 625–87.
Stewart M. A. (1940). Present knowledge of the status of vectors of sylvatic plague in North America. Proc. 6 th Pac. Sci. Congr. 4, 433–7.
Thompson A. (1903). Report on a second outbreak of plague in Sydney (1902). Notation by the Indian Plague Commission in I. Experiments upon the transmission of plague by fleas. J. Hyg., Camb., 6, 425–33 (429).
Thornton E. N. (1933). Positions in regard to plague in the Union of South Africa and the mandated territory of South West Africa. Quart. Bull. Hlth Org. (L. o. N.), 2, 6490.
Tickhomirova M., Sagorskaja M. & Iljin B. (1935). Die Nager und ihre Flöhe in Steppen-Übergangs-Landstrich der Nowo-Kasansker und Slomichensker Rayons und ihre Rolle in der Epidemiologie der Pest. Vestn. mikr. epidemiol. parazitol. 14, 231–53. German summary, pp. 253–4.
Tumanski V. & Poliak I. (1931). On the preservation of plague bacilli in fleas in Suslik nests during the inter-epizootic period. Vestn. mikr. epidemiol. parazitol 10, 325–6.
Verjbitski D. T. (1908). The part played by insects in the epidemiology of plague. J. Hyg., Camb., 8, 162208.
Wheeler C. M. & Douglas J. R. (1941). Transmission studies of sylvatic plague. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 47, 65–6.
Wheeler C. M. & Douglas J. R. (1945). Sylvatic plague studies, V. The determination of vector efficiency. J. infect. Dis. 77, 112.
Wheeler C. M., Douglas J. R. & Evans F. C. (1941). The role of the burrowing owl and the stick-tight flea in the spread of plague. Science, 94, 560–1.
Wherry W. B. (1908). Plague among the ground squirrels of California. J. Infect. Dis. 5, 485506.
Wu Lien-Teh (1934). The original home of plague. Manchurian plague prevention service. Memorial Volume, 1912–32. Rep. Nat. Quarantine Serv. pp. 143–58. 2 Peking Road, Shanghai.
Wu Lien-Teh & Pollitzer R. (1932). A new survey of plague in wild rodents and pneumonic plague. Rep. Nat. Quarantine Serv. pp. 83201, Series iii, 2 Peking Road, Shanghai.
Yersin A. (1894). La peste bubonique a Hong Kong. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 8, 662–7.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.