Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T19:40:16.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PIERNIK MHD code – a multi–fluid, non–ideal extension of the relaxing–TVD scheme (III)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2012

M. Hanasz
Affiliation:
Toruń Centre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. e-mail: mhanasz@astri.uni.torun.pl;
K. Kowalik
Affiliation:
Toruń Centre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. e-mail: mhanasz@astri.uni.torun.pl;
D. Wóltański
Affiliation:
Toruń Centre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. e-mail: mhanasz@astri.uni.torun.pl;
R. Pawłaszek
Affiliation:
Toruń Centre for Astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. e-mail: mhanasz@astri.uni.torun.pl;
Get access

Abstract

We present a new multi–fluid, grid MHD code PIERNIK, which is based on the Relaxing TVD scheme (Jin & Xin 1995). The original scheme (see Trac & Pen 2003; Pen et al 2003) has been extended by an addition of dynamically independent, but interacting fluids: dust and a diffusive cosmic ray gas, described within the fluid approximation, with an option to add other fluids in an easy way. The code has been equipped with shearing–box boundary conditions, and a selfgravity module, Ohmic resistivity module, as well as other facilities which are useful in astrophysical fluid–dynamical simulations. The code is parallelized by means of the MPI library. In this paper we present Ohmic resistivity extension of the original Relaxing TVD MHD scheme, and show examples of magnetic reconnection in cases of uniform and current–dependent resistivity prescriptions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EAS, EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hawley, J.F., & Stone, J.M., 1995, Comput. Phys. Comm. 89, 127CrossRef
Jin, S., & Xin, Z., 1995, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 48, 235CrossRef
Parker, E.N., 1957, J. Geophys. Res., 62, 509CrossRef
Pawłaszek, R., 2008, Magnetic Reconnection in Astrophysical Disks, MSc Thesis (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń)Google Scholar
Pen, U.-L., Arras, P., & Wong, S., 2003, ApJS, 149, 447CrossRef
Petschek, H.E., 1964, ed. W.N. Hess, The Physics of Solar Flares, 425Google Scholar
Stone, J.M., Gardiner, T.A., Teuben, P., Hawley, J.F., & Simon, J.B., 2008, ApJS, 178, 137CrossRef
Sweet, P.A., 1958, ed. B. Lehnert, Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, IAU Symposium, 6, 123Google Scholar
Trac, H., & Pen, U.-L., 2003, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 115, 303CrossRef
Ugai, M., 1992, Phys. Fluids, B 4, 2953CrossRef