Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T03:13:30.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards evidence-based discussion on surveillance: A Rejoinder to Richard A. Epstein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2016


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Case Comments
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


1 ECJ 6 October 2015, Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner.

5 <>, visited 22 June 2016: Surveillance: Ethical Issues, Legal Limitations, and Efficiency, grant agreement no. 284725, for the period 1 February 2012 to 30 June 2015. The reader is instructed, in particular, to consult the SURVEILLE Briefing Note and SURVEILLE deliverable D4.10, both available on the project website. Work towards proper academic publications is in progress.