Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:54:31.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Research History and Neanderthal Occupation at its Northern Margins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2018

Trine Kellberg Nielsen  and
Felix Riede
Trine Kellberg Nielsen
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark
Felix Riede
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Epistemology and research history significantly shape scientific understandings, debates, and publication strategies, albeit often implicitly. In Palaeolithic archaeology in particular, these factors are rarely examined in depth. Here, we present a historiographic analysis of how research history has influenced the debate concerning the possible Neanderthal occupation in Scandinavia. We provide a qualitative discussion of this contentious research field as well as a citation network analysis that visualizes, quantifies, and hence clarifies some of the underlying conceptual, geographic, and temporal patterns in the development of the debate. Our results show significant regionalism as a structuring principle driving this debate as well as a basic rift between professional and avocational archaeologists in how they interpret and publish the available data. We also identify a troubling lack of cross-referencing, even when taking language barriers into account. We argue that the debate about Neanderthal occupation in Scandinavia has been shaped (negatively) by the following phenomena: regionalism, nationalism, lack of research and researchers, non-cumulative work, publication in Nordic languages, science by press release/sensationalism, and a lamentable trend towards arguments ad hominem. In order to take this research field forward, we propose an epistemological turn towards a cumulative, international, and hypothesis-driven agenda based on renewed research efforts and novel citizen science tools.

L’épistémologie et l'histoire de la recherche ont largement influencé nos connaissances scientifiques, discussions et stratégies de publication, quoique souvent de façon implicite. En archéologie du Paléolithique en particulier, ces facteurs ont rarement fait l'objet d'une étude approfondie. Nous présentons donc une analyse historiographique concernant l'influence que l'histoire de la recherche a exercé sur le débat relatif à l'occupation de la Scandinavie par les Néandertaliens. En dehors d'un examen qualitatif des discussions concernant ce thème de recherche controversé nous soumettons une analyse des réseaux de citations qui nous permet de visualiser et de quantifier, et par conséquent de clarifier, certains concepts géographiques et chronologiques sous-jacents qui ont influencé l’évolution du débat. Nos résultats démontrent que le régionalisme structure ces discussions et qu'il existe une division fondamentale entre archéologues professionnels et amateurs dans l'interprétation et la publication des données de base. Nous mettons également en évidence un manque inquiétant de recoupements entre références, même si l'on tient compte des barrières linguistiques. Nous en concluons que les facteurs suivants ont eu un effet (négatif) dans le débat sur l'occupation de la Scandinavie par les Néandertaliens : régionalisme, nationalisme, manque de chercheurs et de recherche, travaux non cumulatifs, publications en langues scandinaves, science par communiqué de presse ou sensationnalisme et une tendance à entretenir des querelles personnelles. Pour pouvoir enfin avancer dans ce domaine, un changement de position épistémologique menant à une stratégie de recherche cumulative, internationale, fondée sur des hypothèses et soutenue par des initiatives de recherches renouvelées (y compris les nouvelles approches des sciences citoyennes) nous parait essentiel. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Die Epistemologie und die Forschungsgeschichte haben, wenn auch oft implizit, unsere wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse, Diskussionen und Veröffentlichungsstrategien stark beeinflusst. Besonders in der paläolithischen Archäologie sind diese Faktoren nur selten eingehend untersucht worden. Dieser Artikel ist der Frage, wie die Forschungsgeschichte die Debatte über die mögliche Besiedlung Skandinaviens von Neandertalern beeinflusst hat, gewidmet. Neben einer qualitativen Auswertung dieses umstrittenen Forschungsthemas legen wir eine Netzwerkanalyse der Zitate vor, die einige konzeptuelle, räumliche und zeitliche Richtlinien in der Entwicklung der Debatte veranschaulicht, quantifiziert und deswegen auch verdeutlicht. Es ergibt sich, dass der Regionalismus als strukturierendes Prinzip in diesen Diskussionen wirkte, und dass die Facharchäologen und nebenberuflichen Teilnehmer in ihrer Deutung und Veröffentlichungen der vorhandenen Daten grundsätzlich voneinander abweichen. Bedenklich fehlen auch Querverweise, auch wenn man die sprachlichen Hürden berücksichtigt. Unserer Meinung nach haben die folgenden Aspekte die Debatte über die Besiedlung Skandinaviens von Neandertalern (negativ) beeinflusst: Regionalismus, Nationalismus, zu wenige Forscher und mangelnde Forschung, nicht kumulative Arbeit, Veröffentlichungen in skandinavischen Sprachen, Verbreitung der Wissenschaft durch Pressemitteilungen oder Sensationalismus und eine bedauerliche Tendenz miteinander persönlich zu streiten. Um in diesem Forschungsgebiet fortzuschreiten, muss eine epistemologische Wende stattfinden, wobei die Fragestellungen aufgrund erneuter Forschungsarbeit und der neuen Bürgerwissenschaft mit kumulativen, internationalen, hypothesengetriebenen Ansätzen angesprochen werden können. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

research historycitation network analysisNeanderthalScandinaviacitizen sciencehistoire de la rechercheanalyse des réseaux de citationsNéandertaliensScandinaviedissémination nordiquesciences citoyennesForschungsgeschichteNetzwerkanalyse der ZitateNeandertalerSkandinaviennördliche VerbreitungBürgerwissenschaft
Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2018 , pp. 506 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashton, N. & Scott, B. 2016. The British Middle Palaeolithic. Quaternary International, 411: 62–76.Google Scholar
Baales, M., Jöris, O., Justus, A. & Roebroeks, W. 2000. Natur oder Kultur? Zur Frage ältestpaläolithischer Artefaktensembles aus Hauptterassenschottern in Deutschland. Germania, 78: 1–20.Google Scholar
Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. 2009. Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, North America, March 2009. Available at: <https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154>. Accessed 18 December 2017..+Accessed+18+December+2017.>Google Scholar
Baudet, J.-L.P. 1967. Le peuplement Vieux Paléolithique d'Europe septentrionale, problèmes et chronologie. Comptes rendus des séances de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 111: 351–58.Google Scholar
Baudet, J.L.P. 1970. Contributions à l’étude du Paléolithique ancien d'Europe septentrionale. In: Gripp, K., ed. Frühe Menschheit und Umwelt – Teil 1. Köln & Wien: Böhlau, pp. 34–51.Google Scholar
Baudet, J.L.P. & Jepsen, E. 1968. Industries lithiques de la baie de Jammerland, Sjaelland. Revue Anthropologique, Organe de l'Institut international d'Anthropologie, 1968: 26–34.Google Scholar
Becker, C. 1971. Istidsmandens redskaber. Skalk, 4: 3–7.Google Scholar
Becker, C. 1985. Danske fund af istids-menneskets redskaber i Nationalmuseet. In: Nielsen, P.O., ed. De Ældste Fund. København: Nationalmuseets, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Benito, B.M., Svenning, J.-C., Nielsen, T.K., Riede, F., Gil-Romera, G., Mailund, T. et al. 2017. The Ecological Niche and Distribution of Neanderthals during the Last Interglacial. Journal of Biogeography, 44: 51–61.Google Scholar
Björck, S., Noe-Nygaard, N., Wolin, J., Houmark-Nielsen, M., Hansen, H.J. & Snowball, I. 2000. Eemian Lake Development, Hydrology and Climate: A Multi-Stratigraphic Study of the Hollerup Site in Denmark. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19: 509–36.Google Scholar
Bjørn, A. 1928. Nogen norske stenalder problemer. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 10: 53–75.Google Scholar
Bøe, J. & Nummedal, A., 1936. Le Finnmarkien: les origines de la civilisation dans l'extrême-nord de l'Europe. Oslo: Aschenhoug.Google Scholar
Brughmans, T. 2010. Connecting the Dots: Towards Archaeological Network Analysis. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 29: 277–303.Google Scholar
Buteux, S., Chambers, J. & Silva, B. 2009. Digging Up the Ice Age: Recognising, Recording and Understanding Fossil and Archaeological Remains Found in British Quarries: A Guide and Practical Handbook. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Chappin, E.J.L. & Ligtvoet, A. 2014. Transition and Transformation: A Bibliometric Analysis of Two Scientific Networks Researching Socio-technical Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30: 715–23.Google Scholar
CITiZAN, n.d. Coastal and Intertidal Zone Archaeological Network. Archaeological Research Frameworks. Available at: <http://www.citizan.org.uk/resources/archaeological-research-frameworks/> Accessed 15 December 2017.+Accessed+15+December+2017.>Google Scholar
Collar, A., Coward, F., Brughmans, T. & Mills, B.J. 2015. Networks in Archaeology: Phenomena, Abstraction, Representation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22: 1–32.Google Scholar
de Mortillet, G. 1883. Le Préhistorique. Antiquité de l'Homme, Paris: Reinwald.Google Scholar
Donner, J. 2007. On the Lack of Evidence of Artifacts in the Susiluola Cave in Finland. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 24: 53–56.Google Scholar
Donner, J. 2008. Some Comments on the Contribution by Hans-Peter Schulz and Tapani Rostedt on Susiluola. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 25: 83.Google Scholar
Duedahl, P. 2005. Nordfynske neandertaler. Årsskrift for Lokalhistorisk Forening for Søndersø Kommune, 2005: 2–7.Google Scholar
Egeland, C.P., Nielsen, T.K., Byø, M., Kjærgaard, P.C., Larsen, N.K. & Riede, F. 2014. The Taphonomy of Fallow Deer (Dama dama) Skeletons from Denmark and its Bearing on the Pre-Weichselian Occupation of Northern Europe by Humans. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 6: 31–61.Google Scholar
Ekholm, G. 1929. Ett nordskandinaviskt paleoliticum? Forvännen, 24: 193–221.Google Scholar
Ellen, R. 2013. ‘These Rude Implements’: Competing Claims for Authenticity in the Eolithic Controversy. Anthropological Quarterly, 86: 445–79.Google Scholar
Fanelli, D. & Glänzel, W. 2013. Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences. PLoS One, 8(6), e66938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066938Google Scholar
Fiedler, L. 1997. Archäologie der ältesten Kultur in Deutschland. Ein Sammelwerk zum älteren Paläolithikum, der Zeit des Homo erectus und des frühen Neandertalers (Materialien zur Vor-und Frühgeschichte von Hessen, 18). Wiesbaden: Landesamt für Denkmalpflege.Google Scholar
Finlayson, C., Pacheco, F.G., Rodriguez-Vidal, J., Fa, D.A., Lopez, J.M.G., Perez, A.S., et al. 2006. Late Survival of Neanderthals at the Southernmost Extreme of Europe. Nature, 443: 850–53.Google Scholar
Foltyn, E., Foltyn, E.M., Jochemczyk, L., Nawrocki, J., Nita, M., Waga, J.M., et al. 2010. The Oldest Human Traces North of the Carpathians (Kończyce Wielkie 4, Poland). Journal of Archaeological Science, 37: 1886–97.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. 1986. The Palaeolithic Settlement of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. & Kruszynski, R. 2009. John Evans, Joseph Prestwich and the Stone that Shattered the Time Barrier. Antiquity, 83: 461–75.Google Scholar
Glob, P.V. 1963. Arkæologiens flyvende tallerkner. Danmarks rigdom på flint vildleder amatørarkæologer. Berlingske Tidende, 27 October 1963.Google Scholar
Glob, P.V. 1972. Farlig Flint. Skalk, 1: 18–20.Google Scholar
Grote, K. & Jacobsen, E.M. 1982. Der Faustkeil vom Karskov-Kliff auf Langeland (Dänemark). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt, 12: 281–85.Google Scholar
Gura, T. 2013. Citizen Science: Amateur Experts. Nature, 496: 259–61.Google Scholar
Hachmann, R. 1974. Rezension: A. Rust, Werkzeuge des Frühmenschen in Europa. Historische Zeitschrift, 217: 644.Google Scholar
Hartz, N. 1909. Bidrag til Danmarks tertiære of diluviale Flora. København: Fr. Bagges Kgl. Hof-Bogtrykkeri.Google Scholar
Heimdahl, J. 2006. Spår av en mellanpaleolitisk befolkning i Sverige? Förnyad granskning av Mårtensöfynden 1938 och 1964. Fornvännen, 10: 1–8.Google Scholar
Holm, J. 1986. The Quaternary and the Early/Middle Palaeolithic of Denmark. In: Tuffreau, A. & Sommé, J., eds. Chronostratigraphie et faciès culturels du Paléolithique inférieur et moyen dans l'Europe du nord-ouest (Supplément au Bulletin de l'Association Francaise pour l’Étude du Quaternaire). Paris: Société Préhistorique Française, pp. 75–80.Google Scholar
Holm, J. 1987. Primitiv flint i Vejstrup ådal – de første fynboer? Ringe: Midtfyns Bogtryk.Google Scholar
Holm, J. 2000. Primitiv flint i Vejstrup Ådal – de første fynboer? Arkæologi for alle, 3: 34–42.Google Scholar
Holm, J. & Larsson, L. 1995. The Earliest Occupation of Europe: Scandinavia. In: Roebroeks, W. & van Kolfschoten, T., eds. The Earliest Occupation of Europe. Proceedings of the European Science Foundation Workshop at Tautavel (France). Leiden: Leiden University, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
Immonen, V. & Taavitsainen, J.-P. 2011. Oscillating between National and International: The Case of Finnish Archaeology. In: Lozny, L.R., ed. Comparative Archaeologies: A Sociological View of the Science of the Past. New York: Springer, pp. 137–77.Google Scholar
Jensen, H. 1980. FHM 1689 Vejstrup Skov. Unpublished excavation report. Forhistorisk Museum Moesgård.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 2006. Danmarks oldtid: Stenalder (2nd edition). København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Jepsen, E. 1973. Dansk føristidskultur: for amatører. Self-published.Google Scholar
Johansen, L. & Stapert, D. 1996. Handaxes from Denmark: Neandertal Tools or ‘Vicious Flints’? Palaeohistoria, 37/38: 1–28.Google Scholar
Kinnunen, K.A. 2007. Fractured Siltstones in Susivuori Esker Close to Susiluola Cave, Karijoki Finland. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 24: 57–63.Google Scholar
Kjærgaard, P.C. 2014. Inventing Homo gardarensis: Prestige, Pressure, and Human Evolution in Interwar Scandinavia. Science in Context, 27: 359–83.Google Scholar
Knappett, C. 2013. Network Analysis in Archaeology: New Approaches to Regional Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K. 1993. The Strength of the Past and its Great Might: An Essay on the Use of the Past. Journal of European Archaeology, 1: 3–32.Google Scholar
Larsson, L., 2000. Plenty of Mammoths but No Humans? Scandinavia during the Middle Weichselian. In: Roebroeks, W., Mussi, M., Svoboda, J. & Fennenma, K., eds. Hunters of the Golden Age: The Mid Upper Palaeolithic of Eurasia 30,000–20,000 bp. Leiden: Leiden University Press, pp. 155–63.Google Scholar
Lyell, C. 1863. The Geological Evidence of the Antiquity of Man, with Remarks on Theories of the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Lyngbak, E. 1993. Amatørerne. In: Hvass, S. & Storgaard, B., eds. Da klinger i Muld: 25 års arkæologi i Danmark. Copenhagen: Kgl. Nordiske Oldskriftselskab; Højbjerg: Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab: Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag, p. 280.Google Scholar
MacCurdy, G.G. 1909. Recent Discoveries Bearing on the Antiquity of Man in Europe. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report, 64: 531–83.Google Scholar
Madsen, E. 1959. Danske Fund. Naturens Verden, March: 95–96.Google Scholar
Madsen, E. 1962. Primitiv flintkultur ved Isefjord. Årbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1962: 79–93.Google Scholar
Madsen, E. 1968. En arkæologisk-geologisk undersøgelse af klinten ved Ejby Bro, Isefjord. Meddelelser fra Dansk Geologisk Forening, 18: 33–45.Google Scholar
McNabb, J. 2012. Dissent with Modification: Human Origins, Palaeolithic Archaeology and Evolutionary Anthropology in Britain 1859–1901. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Mills, B.J. 2017. Social Network Analysis in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46: 379–97.Google Scholar
Mithen, S., Finlayson, B. & Finlay, N. 1993. A Lower Palaeolithic Handaxe from Scotland. Lithics – The Journal of the Lithic Studies Society, 13: 1–3.Google Scholar
Møhl-Hansen, U. 1955. Første sikre spor af mennesker fra interglacialtid i Danmark. Marvspaltede knogler fra diatoméjorden ved Hollerup. Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 1954: 101–26.Google Scholar
Montelius, G.O.A. 1919. De mandelformiga flintverktygens ålder. Antikvarisk Tidskrift för Sverige, 20: 1–20.Google Scholar
Montelius, G.O.A. 1921. Palaeolithic Implements Found in Sweden. The Antiquaries Journal, 1: 98–104.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T.K. 2016. Northern Neanderthals: A Systematic Assessment of the Possibility of a Pre-Modern Human Occupation of Southern Scandinavia. Unpublished dissertation, School of Culture and Society, Department of Heritage Studies, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T.K. Benito, B.M., Svenning, J.-C., Sandel, B., McKerracher, L., Riede, F., et al. 2017. Investigating Neanderthal Dispersal above 55 N in Europe during the Last Interglacial Complex. Quaternary International, 431: 88–103.Google Scholar
Nordmann, V.J.H. 1936. Menneskets indvandring til Norden. København: C.A. Reitzels.Google Scholar
Nummedal, A. 1926. Stenalderfundene i Alta. Norsk geologisk tidsskrift, 9: 43–47.Google Scholar
Núñez, M. 2007. My Problem with Susiluola. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 24: 84–91.Google Scholar
Núñez, M. 2008. Susiluola: The Problem Persists. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 25: 84–85.Google Scholar
Otte, M. & Keeley, L.H. 1990. The Impact of Regionalism on Palaeolithic Studies. Current Anthropology, 31: 577–82.Google Scholar
Papoulia, C. 2016. Seaward Dispersals to the NE Mediterranean Islands in the Pleistocene: The Lithic Evidence in Retrospect. Quaternary International, 431, Part B: 64–87.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P. & Niskanen, M. 2005. Neanderthals in Susiluola Cave, Finland, during the Last Interglacial Period? Fennoscandia archaeologica, 22: 79–87.Google Scholar
Pielenz, O.K. 1959. Vorläufiger Bericht über die Esbjergkultur und die Hohwachter Gruppe. Hamburg: self-published.Google Scholar
Pielenz, O.K. 1966. Herkunft und Stellung der Baltischen Gruppe innerhalb des nordeuropäischen Altpaläolithikums. Bremen: Volkshochschule.Google Scholar
Piliciauskas, G., Jurkenas, D. & Laurat, T. 2011. Neandertalieciai Lietuvoje? Prielaidos, tyrimai ir perspektyvos. Lietuvos Archeologija, 37: 9–24.Google Scholar
Prufer, O. 1957. Review of Artefakte aus der Zeit des Homo Heidelbergensis in Süd- und Norddeutschland by Rust Alfred, pp. 43 text, 40 pl. Rudolf Habelt Verlag, Bonn, 1956. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 22: 218–19.Google Scholar
Reich, E.K. 2005. Danmarksfortællinger: 90 fortællinger fra Danmarks fødsel til de yngste slægtled. Valby: Vindrose.Google Scholar
Retzius, A.A. 1864. Ueber die Schädelformen der Nordbewohner. In: Retzius, A.A., Ethnologische Schriften von Anders Retzius nach dem Tode des Verfassers gesammelt. Stockholm: P.A. Nordstedt & Söner: pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Riede, F., Egeland, C.P. & Nielsen, T.K. 2012. Nyt lys på gamle ben. Skalk, 5: 6–10.Google Scholar
Riede, F., Egeland, C.P., Nielsen, T.K., Larsen, N.K., Odgaard, B.V. & Kjærgaard, P.C. 2013. Dådyrknoglerne fra Hollerup. Aarbøger for nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 2011–2012: 7–32. Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Felix_Riede/publication/262379360_Dadyrknoglerne_fra_Hollerup_-_sikre_spor_af_mennesker_fra_interglacialtid_i_Danmark/links/53ed09b90cf26b9b7dc0bcc2/Dadyrknoglerne-fra-Hollerup-sikre-spor-af-mennesker-fra-interglacialtid-i-Danmark.pdf> Accessed 20 March 2018.+Accessed+20+March+2018.>Google Scholar
Ripley, W.Z. 1899. The Races of Europe: A Sociological Study. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., Conard, N.J. & van Kolfschoten, T. 1992. Dense Forests, Cold Steppes and the Palaeolithic Settlement of Northern Europe. Current Anthropology, 33: 551–86.Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., Hublin, J.-J. & MacDonald, K. 2011. Continuities and Discontinuities in Neandertal Presence: A Closer Look at Northwestern Europe. In: Ashton, N.M., Lewis, S.G. & Stringer, C.B., eds. The Ancient Human Occupation of Britain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 113–24.Google Scholar
Rolland, N. 2014. The Pleistocene Peopling of the North: Paleolithic Milestones and Thresholds Horizons in Northern Eurasia: Part I: Lower Paleolithic Antecedents. Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, 42: 2–17.Google Scholar
Romanowska, I. 2012. Ex Oriente Lux: A Re-evaluation of the Lower Palaeolithic of Central and Eastern Europe. In: Ruebens, K., Romanowska, I. & Bynoe, R., eds. Unravelling the Palaeolithic: Ten Years of Research at the Centre for the Archaeology of Human Origins (CAHO, University of Southampton) (BAR International Series 2400). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Rust, A. 1956. Artefakte aus der Zeit des Homo heidelbergensis in Süd-und Norddeutschland. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Rust, A. 1958. Die älteste Besiedlung des Sylter Raumes. In: Kersten, K. & Baume, P.L., eds. Vorgeschichte der nordfriesischen Inseln. Neumünster: Wachholtz, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
Rust, A. 1959. Om den tidligste menneskelige bosættelse i Nordeuropa. Naturens Verden, Marts: 88–95.Google Scholar
Rust, A. & Steffens, G. 1962. Die Artefakte der Altonaer Stufe von Wittenbergen: Eine mittelpleistozäne Untergruppe der Heidelberger Kulturen. Neumünster: Wachholtz.Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P. 2002. The Lithic Industry from Layers IV–V, Susiluola Cave, Western Finland, Dated to the Eemian Interglacial. Préhistoire Européenne, 16/17: 7–23.Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P. 2007. Artefact-Geofact Analysis of the Lithic Material from the Susiluola Cave. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 24: 64–75.Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P. & Rostedt, T. 2008. Debating Susiluola: Some Commentary. Fennoscandia archaeologica, 25: 73–82.Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P., Eriksson, B., Hirvas, H., Huhta, P., Jungner, H., Purhonen, P. et al. 2002. Excavations at Susiluola Cave. Suomen Musen, 2002: 5–45.Google Scholar
Schulz, H.-P., Hirvas, H., Huhta, P., Moisanen, M. & Rostedt, T. 2010. A New Contribution to the Neanderthal Discussion: Excavation Results from the Susiluola Cave Site in Western Finland. Germania, 88: 1–55.Google Scholar
Serangeli, J. & Bolus, M. 2008. Out of Europe: The Dispersal of a Successful European Hominin Form. Quartär, 55: 83–98.Google Scholar
Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen/Agency for Culture and Palaces, n.d. Arkæologiske strategier. Available at <http://slks.dk/fortidsminder-diger/arkaeologi-paa-land/museernes-arkaeologiske-arbejde/arkaeologiske-strategier/> Accessed 15 December 2017.+Accessed+15+December+2017.>Google Scholar
Steensby, H.P. 1908. Racestudier i Danmark. Geografisk Tidsskrift, 19: 135–45.Google Scholar
Steensby, H.P. 1911. Foreløbige betragtninger over Danmarks raceantropologi. Meddelelser om Danmarks Antropologi, 1: 83–148.Google Scholar
Westerby, E. 1956. Nyt fra min Grusgrav. Jyllands-Postens, 8–9 January 1956.Google Scholar
White, M.J. & Pettitt, P.B. 2011. The British Late Middle Palaeolithic: An Interpretative Synthesis of Neanderthal Occupation at the Northwestern Edge of the Pleistocene World. Journal of World Prehistory: 24(1), 25–97.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nielsen and Riede supplementary material

Nielsen and Riede supplementary material 1

Download Nielsen and Riede supplementary material(File)
File 81.1 KB