Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:08:03.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenotypic variation in Fucus spiralis (Phaeophyceae): morphology, chemical phenotype and their relationship to the environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2001

GRAHAM W. SCOTT
Affiliation:
The Scarborough Centre for Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Scarborough Campus, Filey Road, Scarborough, North Yorks. YO11 3AZ, UK
SUSAN L. HULL
Affiliation:
The Scarborough Centre for Coastal Studies, University of Hull, Scarborough Campus, Filey Road, Scarborough, North Yorks. YO11 3AZ, UK
SARAH E. HORNBY
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Sciences and Coastal Management, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
F. GAVIN HARDY
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Sciences and Coastal Management, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
NICK J.P. OWENS
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Sciences and Coastal Management, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
Get access

Abstract

Phenotypic variation of Fucus spiralis was examined in terms of morphology and chemical composition, as determined by pyrolysis mass spectrometry (PyMS). After discriminant analysis both techniques revealed the existence of two morphotypes which were subsequently designated as F. spiralis and F. spiralis forma nanus. The nanus plants differed from the nominate spiralis in that they were shorter, narrower and had fewer branches, but had more units of growth from a single holdfast. F. spiralis f. nanus was consistently higher on the shore than F. spiralis, but the two morphotypes overlapped in terms of shore exposure level. We suggest that the formae exist within a mosaic of stable phenotypes representing populations specifically adapted to the local environment. PyMS data were in agreement with morphological descriptions showing that gross morphology can be correlated with chemical composition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 British Phycological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)