Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T03:23:40.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural Economics and Regulation: The Design Process of Regulatory Nudges by Maria C de Campos, London, Routledge, 2023, 232 pp.

Review products

Behavioural Economics and Regulation: The Design Process of Regulatory Nudges by Maria C de Campos, London, Routledge, 2023, 232 pp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2024

Ollie Bartlett Open the ORCID record for Ollie Bartlett [Opens in a new window]
Ollie Bartlett*
Affiliation:
Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
*
Email: ollie.bartlett@mu.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , First View , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 C-376/98 Germany v Parliament and Council [2000] ECLI:EU:C:2000:544.

2 This would be a novel expansion to the literature, building upon similar types of work that explore the ways in which nudge design impacts validity; see, eg, K Grill, “Expanding the Nudge: Designing Choice Contexts and Choice Contents” (2014) 5 Rationality, Markets and Morals 139–62.

3 Eg R Baldwin, “From regulation to behaviour change: giving nudge the third degree” (2014) 77(6) Modern Law Review 831–57; A van Aaken, “Judge the Nudge: In Search of the Legal Limits of Paternalistic Nudging in the EU” in A Alemanno and A Sibony (eds), Nudging and the Law. What Can EU Law Learn from Behavioural Sciences? (Oxford, Hart 2015).

4 S Gainsbury et al, “Reducing Internet Gambling Harms Using Behavioral Science: A Stakeholder Framework” (2020) 11 Frontiers in Psychiatry 598589.

5 F Motka et al, “Who uses self-exclusion to regulate problem gambling? A systematic literature review” (2018) 7(4) Journal of Behavioral Addictions 903.

6 C Devault-Tousignant, “Qualitative Experience of Self-Exclusion Programmes: A Scoping Review” (2023) 20(5) International Journal of Environmental Research on Public Health 3987.

7 C Varallo and C Cravetto, “Alcoholic Beverages Labelling: Analysis of the Joint-self Regulatory Proposal of the Industry on Nutrition Labelling and Ingredients’ Declaration” (2018) 9(2) European Journal of Risk Regulation 329.

8 The summary of the consultation responses can be accessed at <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12749-Food-labelling-revision-of-rules-on-information-provided-to-consumers/public-consultation_en>.

9 See the analysis by Movendi International at <https://movendi.ngo/news/2022/02/18/european-parliament-does-dirty-work-for-big-alcohol-votes-to-water-down-cancer-prevention-through-alcohol-policy/>.

10 The Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed that even significant negative consequences for economic operators can be justified on the ground of protecting public health: C-547/14 Philip Morris Brands and Others [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:325.