Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T13:56:51.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse and Morality: two case studies of social conflicts in a segmentary and a functionally differentiated society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Max Miller
Get access

Extract

No sociologist was more concerned with morality and the interrelation between morality and society than Émile Durkheim; and at least sociological approaches to understand morality can be expected to clarify whether and to what extent they are willing to follow Durkheim's account.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , June 1992 , pp. 3 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coser, L. A., 1967, Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict (New York 1967).Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R., 1961, Gesellschaft und Freiheit (München).Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., 1893, De la division du travail social. Engl. transl. 1933: The Division of Labor in Society (New York, Macmillan); Germ, transl. 1977: Über die Teilung der sozialen Arbeit (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., 1906, La détermination du fait moral. Engl. transl. 1953: Sociology and Philosophy (London, Cohen and West); Germ, transl. 1967: Soziologie und Philosophie (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., 1911, Jugements de valeur et jugements de réalité. (Engl. transl. 1953: Sociology and Philosophy (London, Cohen and West); Germ, transl. 1967: Soziologie und Philosophie (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Durkheim, E., 1912, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Engl. transl. 1915: The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (New York, Macmillan); Germ, transl. 1984: Die elementaren Formen des religiösen Lebens (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Fallers, L. A., 1969, Law without Precedent. Leg al Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga (Chicago, Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Feffer, M., 1959, The cognitive implications of role-taking behavior, Journal of Personality, XXVII, 152–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feffer, M., 1970, A developmental analysis of interpersonal behavior, Psychological Review, LXXVII, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Fry, C., Wright, J. & Jarvis, P., 1968, The Development of Role-Taking and Communication Skills in Children (New York, Wiley).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1981, Theorie kommunikativen Handelns (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1983, Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., 1952, Phänomenologie des Geistes (Hamburg, Felix Meiner) (6. Auflage).Google Scholar
Hutchins, E., 1980, Culture and Inference (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L., 1986, A Current Statement on Some Theoretical Issues, in S., & Modgil, C., Kohlberg, Lawrence, Consensus and Controversy (Philadelphia, The Falmer Press), pp. 485–546.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., 1984, Soziale Systeme (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., 1986, Ökologische Kommunikation (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag). Engl. transl.: Ecological Communication (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., 1987, Soziologische Aufklärung 4: Soziale Differenzierung (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. & Fuchs, P., 1989, Reden und Schweigen (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Lukes, S., 1973, Émile Durkheim. His Life and Work: a historical and critical study (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., 1965, Coral Gardens and Their Magic (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Mayntz, R., 1987, Politische Steuerung und gesellschaftliche Steuerungsprobleme. Anmerkungen zu einem theoretischen Paradigma, in Ellwein, Th., Hesse, J. J., Mayntz, R. & Scharpf, F. W. (Hgs), Jahrbuch zur Staats- und Verwaltungswissenschaft (Baden-Baden, Nomos), pp. 89–109.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H., 1934, Mind, Self, and Society (Chicago, Chicago University Press).Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1986, Kollektive Lernprozesse. Studien zur Grundlegung einer soziologischen Lerntheorie (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1987a, Argumentation and Cognition, in Hickmann, M. (ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought (New York, Academic Press), pp. 225–250.Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1987b, Culture and Collective Argumentation, in Argumentation, I, pp. 121–148 (Dordrecht, Reidel).Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1987c, Selbstreferenz und Differenzerfahrung—einige kritische Überlegungen zu Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme, in Haferkamp, H. & Schmid, M. (Hgs), Sinn, Kommunikation und Differenz: zur Sozialtheorie Niklas Luhmanns (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp), pp. 187–211.Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1990, Kollektive Erinnerungen und gesellschaftliche Lernprozesse, in Bergmann, W. & Erb, R. (Hgs), Antisemitismus in der politischen Kultur seit 1945 (Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag), pp. 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M., 1992, Intersystemic Discourse and Coordinated Dissent. A critique of Luhmann's concept of ecological communication, in Theory, Culture & Society (in press).Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1992, Rationaler Dissens. Zur gesellschaftlichen Funktion sozialer Konflikte, in Giegel, H.-J. (Hg.), Kommunikation und Konsens (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, in press).Google Scholar
Parsons, T. & Shils, E. (eds)., 1951, Toward a General Theory of Action (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, D. L., 1986, Toward a Just Social Order (Princeton, N. J., Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., 1932, Le jugement moral chez l'enfant (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Pospisil, L., 1971, Anthropology of Law (New York, Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Powell, H.A., 1956, An analysis of present-day social structure in the Trobriands (Ph. D. diss., University of London).Google Scholar
Selman, R. L., 1975, Social-Cognitive Understanding: a guide to educational and clinical practice, in Lickona, T. (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston), pp. 299–316.Google Scholar
Selman, R. L., 1980, The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding (New York, Academic Press).Google Scholar
Toulmin, S., 1958, The Uses of Argument (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Waller, M., 1978, Soziales Lernen und Interaktionskompetenz (Stuttgart, Klett).Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1919, Wissenschaft als Beruf, in Weber, M., Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tübingen, Mohr, 1968), pp. 582–613.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B., 1976, Women of Value, Men of Renown (Austin, University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B., 1988, The Trobrianders of Papua New Guinea (New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston).Google Scholar
Wesel, U., 1985, Frühformen des Rechts in vorstaatlichen Gesellschaften (Frankfurt, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Wolfe, A., 1989, Whose Keeper? Social science and moral obligation (Berkeley, University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, K. H. (ed.), 1960, Émile Durkheim (Repr. 1979: New York, Arno Press).Google Scholar