Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T15:35:29.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Friendship and trust as moral ideals: an historical approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Allan Silver
Get access

Extract

It is not peculiar to modern society that ideals of friendship express some of the ‘noblest’ potentials of human association. But an ideal of friendship so contrary to the forms of association that dominate the larger society is distinctive to our times. Explicit contract, rational exchange, formal division of labor, and impersonal institutions define the Great Society; by inversion, they also define those ideals constituting friendship understood at its morally best. Especially in the urban core of Western society, particularly its more educated sectors, friendships are judged of high quality to the extent that they invert the ways of the larger society. In this ideal, friendships are voluntary, unspecialized, informal and private. They are grounded in open-ended commitments without explicit provision for their termination—unlike contractual relations, prior stipulation of the conditions that legitimately end a friendship cannot be constitutive of friendship. In such an ideal, friendships are diminished in moral quality if terms of exchange between friends are consciously or scrupulously monitored, for this implies that utilities derived from friendships are constitutive, as in market relations, rather than valued as expressions of personal intentions and commitments.

Type
Sentiments moraux, effets sociaux
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , November 1989 , pp. 274 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. and McCulloch, A., Communes, Sociology and Society (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Acceto, F. [1641], Della dissimulazione honesta (Genoa, Costa and Nolan, 1983).Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H., Merit and Responsibility: a study in Greek values (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H., ‘Friendship’ and ‘self-sufficiency’ in Homer and Aristotle, Classical Quarterly, XIII (1963), 195–209.Google Scholar
Alberti, L. A. [1437], The Family in Renaissance Florence (translation) of I libri delta famiglia) (Columbia, South Carolina, University of South Carolina Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Allan, G. A., A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship (London, George Allen & Unwin, 1979).Google Scholar
Aymard, M., Amitié et convivialité in Roger, Chartier (ed.), De la Renaissance aux Lumières, t. III of Histoire de la vie privée, directed by Philippe Ariès and Georges Duby (Paris, Seuil, 1986).Google Scholar
Bacon, F. [1580], Of followers and friends, Bacon (London, Humpreys, 1903).Google Scholar
Bellamy, J. G., The law of Treason in England in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Benn, S. I. and Gaus, G. F., The liberal conception of the public and private in Benn, and Gaus, (eds), Conceptions of the Public and Private in Social Life (London, Croom Helm, 1980).Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. [1969], Indo-European Language and Society (London, Faber & Faber, 1973).Google Scholar
Blau, P., Exchange and Power in Social Life (New York, Wiley, 1964).Google Scholar
Caudwell, C. [1938], Studies in a Dying Culture (London, Bodley Head, 1948).Google Scholar
Deutsch, M., Trust and suspicion, Journal of Conflict Resolution, II (1968), 265–279.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., Friendship and the structure of trust and solidarity in society, in Leyton, (ed.) (1974).Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. and Roniger, L., Patronclient relations as a model of structuring social exchange, Comparative Studies in Society and History, XXII (1980), 42–77.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N.Patrons, Clients and Friends: interpersonal relations and the structure of trust in society (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Euripides, , Iphigenia in Tauris, in Lattimore, Greene (eds), Euripides: Four Tragedies, Vol. II (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E., Zande blood brotherhood, Africa, VI (1933), 369–401.Google Scholar
Fischer, C., To Dwell among Friends: personal networks in town and city (Berkeley, California, University of California Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Fraisse, J. C., Philia: la notion d'amitié dans la philosophie ancienne (Paris, Vrin, 1974).Google Scholar
Frame, D., The Reception of Montaigne in France (New York, Columbia University Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust. Making and breaking cooperative relations (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1988).Google Scholar
Ganshoff, F. L., Feudalism (New York, Harper & Brothers, 1961).Google Scholar
Gould, C. G., Beyond causality in the social sciences: reciprocity as a model of non-exploitative social relationships, Part II, in Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Epistemology: methodology and the social sciences (Boston, Reidl, 1980), pp. 63–88.Google Scholar
Held, V., On the meaning of trust, Ethics, LXXVIII (1968), 156–159.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A., The Passions and the Interests: political arguments for capitalism before its triumph (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Hobbes, [1650], Human nature, in Raphael, D. D. (ed.), British Moralists 1650–1800, I (1969), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
Hutter, H., Politics as Friendship: the origins of classical notions of politics in the theory and practice of friendship (Waterloo, Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
James, M., English politics and the concept of honour, Past & Present, Supplement 3 (1978).Google Scholar
Keen, M., Brotherhood-in-arms, History, XLVII (1962), 1–17.Google Scholar
Kiefer, T. M., Institutionalized friendship and warfare among the Tausug of Jolo, Ethnology, IV (1968), 225–244.Google Scholar
Kon, I. S., Freundschaft: Geschichte und Sozialpsychologie der Freundschaft als soziale Institution und individuelle Beziehung (Hamburg, Rowohlt, 1979).Google Scholar
Laumann, E., Bonds of Pluralism: the form and substance of urban social networks (New York, Wiley, 1973).Google Scholar
Levinson, S., 1984. Testimonial privileges and the preferences of friendship, Duke Law Journal (1984), 631–662.Google Scholar
Leyton, E. (ed.), The Compact: selected dimensions of friendship (Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1974).Google Scholar
Liebow, E., Tally's Corner: a study of Negro streetcorner men (Boston, Little Brown, 1967).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Trust and Power (New York and Chichester, Wiley, 1979).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Love as Passion: the codification of intimacy (Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Luhmann, N., Familiarity, confidence and trust: problems and alternatives in Gambetta, (ed.) (1988).Google Scholar
Maisonneuve, J., Psycho-sociologie des affinités (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1966).Google Scholar
Mauzi, R. [1960], L'idée du bonheur dans la littérature et la pensée française aux XVIIIe siècle (Genève, Paris, Slatkin Reprints, 1979).Google Scholar
Mills, L. J., One Soul in Bodies Twain: friendship in Tudor and Elizabethan drama (Bloomington, Indiana, Principia Press, 1937).Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. [1580], Of friendship (Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Mullaney, S., Lying like truth: riddle, representation and treason in Renaissance England, English Literary History, XLVII (1981), 32–47.Google Scholar
Naegele, K. C., Friendship and acquaintances: an exploration of some social distinctions, Harvard Educational Review, XXVIII (1958), 232–252.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. [1949], The Idea of Usury: from tribal brotherhood to universal otherhood (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Norton, D., Personal Destinies: a philosophy of ethical individualism (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Paine, R., In search of friendship: an exploration in ‘middle class’ culture, Man, 4 (1969), 505–524.Google Scholar
Parlee, M., The friendship bond, Psychology Today, 10 1979.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. [1937], The Structure of Social Action (Glencoe, Ill., The Free Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, J., Pseudo-Kinship, International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, VIII (1968), pp. 408–413.Google Scholar
Plutarch, , How to tell a flatterer from a friend, Plutarch's Moralia, I (Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1927), pp. 261–395.Google Scholar
Pogrebin, L. C., Among Friends: who we like, why we like them, and what we do with them (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1986).Google Scholar
Pollock, F. and Maitland, F. [1895], The History of English Law, before the Time of Edward I, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Praz, M. [1928], ‘The politic brain’: Machiavelli and the Elizabethans in Praz, , The flaming heart (Gloucester, Mass., Peter Smith, 1966).Google Scholar
Reiman, J., Privacy, intimacy and personhood, Philosophy & Public Affairs (1976) 6, esp. 30–35.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. [1762], Émile, transl. Bloom, Allan (New York, Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Rubin, L., Just Friends (New York, Basic Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Saint-Évremond, [1676], Sur l'amitié, in Planhol, R. (ed.), Œuvres, I (Paris, Côté des Livres, 1927).Google Scholar
Schwimmer, E., 1974. Friendship and kinship: an attempt to relate two anthropological concepts, in Leyton (1974).Google Scholar
Silver, A., The lawyer and the scrivener, Partisan Review, no. 3 (1981), pp. 409–424.Google Scholar
Silver, A., Friendship and trust as moral ideals: an historical approach,unpublished paper presented to the American Sociological Association(Washington D.C.1985a).Google Scholar
Silver, A., ‘Trust’ in social and political theory in Suttles, G. D. and Zald, M. N. (eds.), The challenge of social control: citizenship and institution building in modern society (Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1985 b).Google Scholar
Silver, V., Friendship in commercial society: eighteenth century social theory and modern sociology, American Journal of Sociology, LXXXXV (1990) 6.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. [1907], The Philosophy of Money (London and Boston, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978).Google Scholar
Simmel, G., [1908], The Sociology of Georg Simmel (Glencoe, Ill., The Free Press, 1950).Google Scholar
Smith, A. [1759, 1790], The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Snell, B., Poetry and Society (Bloomington, Indiana, University of Indiana Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Spivack, B., Shakespeare and the Allegory of Evil (New York, Columbia University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Stack, P., All our Kin: strategies for survival in a Black community (New York, Harper & Row, 1974).Google Scholar
Stone, L., The Crisis of the Aristocracy 1558–1641 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Stone, L., The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800 (New York, Harpers, 1977).Google Scholar
Suttles, G., Friendship as a social institution in McCall, G. (ed.), Social Relationships (Chicago, Aldine, 1970).Google Scholar
Tegnaeus, H., Blood-Brothers: an ethnosociological study of the institution of blood-brotherhood with special reference to Africa (New York, Philosophical Library, 1952).Google Scholar
Telfer, E., Friendship, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXI (1970), 223–242.Google Scholar
Tenbruck, F., Freundschaft: ein Betrag zu einer Soziologie der Persönalichen Beziehungend, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, XVI (1964), 431–450.Google Scholar
Terry, P. (translator), The Song of Roland (Indianapolis, Indiana, Bobbs-Merrill, 1965).Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. [1887], Community and Society (New York, Harpers, 1963).Google Scholar
Trumbach, R., The Rise of the Egalitarian Family: aristocratic kinship and domestic relations in eighteenth century England (New York, Academic Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Turner, R., The real self: from institution to impulse, American Journal of Sociology, LXXXI (1976), 989–1016.Google Scholar
Velez-Ibañez, G., Bonds of Trust: the cultural system of rotating credit associations among urban Mexicans and Chicanos (Rutgers, N. J., Rutgers University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Verbrugge, L., The structure of adult friendship choices, Social Forces, LVI (1977), 576–597.Google Scholar
Wallman, S., Kinship, a-kinship, antikinship: variations in the logic of kinship situations, in Leyton (1974).Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R., Kinship, friendship and patron-client relations in complex societies, in Banton, M. (ed.), The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies (London, Tavistock, 1966).Google Scholar