No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Putting Morals into Economics: From Value Neutrality to the Moral Economy and the Economization of Morality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2023
Abstract
The economic discipline plays a performative role in constructing the moral order of market society. Yet, little attention has been paid to what economists explicitly regard as moral or how they conceive of morality. This article reflects a recent attempt to put morals into economics, that is, to introduce morality as a research topic in behavioural and experimental economics. It maps three research programs that theorize the moral economy. The programs emphasize the moral foundations of market society, the moral limits of market expansion, and the moral consequences of market trading and, thus, appear irreconcilable with classifications of economists as market enthusiasts or moral agnostics. At the same time, however, the literature centres on an “economized” form of morality that is corrective to market inefficiencies, attributed to the responsibility of the individual, and expressed in rational terms. In doing so, this literature contributes to redefining moral problems in economic terms.
Résumé
La discipline économique joue un rôle performatif dans la construction de l’ordre moral de la société de marché. Pourtant, peu d’attention a été accordée à ce que les économistes considèrent explicitement comme moral et à la manière dont ils conçoivent la moralité. Cet article reflète une tentative récente d’introduire la morale dans l’économie, c’est-à-dire d’introduire la morale comme sujet de recherche en économie comportementale et expérimentale. Il cartographie trois programmes de recherche qui théorisent l’économie morale. Les programmes mettent l’accent sur les fondements moraux de la société de marché, les limites morales de l’expansion du marché et les conséquences morales du commerce de marché et, par conséquent, semblent inconciliables avec les classifications des économistes comme enthousiastes du marché ou agnostiques moraux. Mais en même temps, la littérature s’articule autour d’une morale « économisée », correctrice des inefficacités du marché, imputée à la responsabilité de l’individu et exprimée en termes rationnels. Ce faisant, cette littérature contribue à redéfinir les problèmes moraux en termes économiques.
Zusammenfassung
Die ökonomische Disziplin spielt bei der Konstruktion einer moralischen Ordnung der Marktgesellschaft eine performative Rolle. Dennoch wurde bisher kaum untersucht, was Ökonomen explizit als moralisch ansehen und wie sie Moral konzipieren. Dieser Artikel diskutiert einen aktuellen Versuch, Moral in die Wirtschaftswissenschaften zu integrieren, bzw. Moral als Forschungsthema in die Verhaltens- und Experimentalökonomie einzuführen. Er stellt drei Forschungsprogramme vor, die Bezug auf die moralische Ökonomie nehmen. Die Programme betonen die moralischen Grundlagen der Marktgesellschaft, die moralischen Grenzen der Marktexpansion und die moralischen Konsequenzen des Markthandels und scheinen daher unvereinbar mit der gängigen Kategorisierung von Ökonomen als Marktenthusiasten oder moralischen Agnostikern. Gleichzeitig wird in dieser Literatur jedoch eine „ökonomisierte“ Form der Moral in den Mittelpunkt gestellt, die Ineffizienzen des Marktes korrigieren soll, auf der Verantwortung des Einzelnen beruht und in rationalen Begriffen ausgedrückt wird. Auf diese Weise trägt diese Literatur dazu bei, moralische Probleme in ökonomischer Terminologie neu zu definieren.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , April 2023 , pp. 31 - 60
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Journal of Sociology
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abend, Gabriel, 2011. “Thick Concepts and the Moral Brain,” European Journal of Sociology, 52 (1): 143–172 [https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/S0003975611000051].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abend, Gabriel, 2014. The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics. The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics (Princeton, Princeton University Press) [https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.52-0351].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alger, Ingela and Weibull, Jörgen W., 2013. “Homo Moralis—Preference Evolution Under Incomplete Information and Assortative Matching,” Econometrica, 81 (6): 2269–2302 [https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta10637].Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno, 2011. “Morals and Politics in the Ideology of Neo-Liberalism,” Socio-Economic Review, 9 (1): 3–30 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angner, Erik, 2019. “We’re All Behavioral Economists Now,” Journal of Economic Methodology, 26 (3): 195–207 [https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625210].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. and Debreu, Gerard, 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, 22 (3): 265–290 [https://doi.org/10.2307/1907353].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspers, Patrik, 2005. “Markets, Sociology of,” in Beckert, J. and Zafirovski, M., eds, International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology (London, Routledge: 427-432).Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. 2009. “Economics as a Moral Science,” Economica, 76 (s1): 791–804 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00788.x].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. 2010. The Puzzle of Modern Economics: Science or Ideology? (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press) [https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511780196].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Roger E. and Medema, Steve, 2009. “Defining Economics: The Long Road to Acceptance of the Robbins Definition,” Economica, 76: 805–820 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00789.x].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsiger, Philip, 2021. “The Dynamics of ‘Moralized Markets’: A Field Perspective,” Socio-Economic Review, 19 (1): 59–82 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz051].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardsley, Nicholas, Cubitt, Robin, Loomes, Graham, Moffatt, Peter, Starmer, Chris and Sugden, Robert, 2009. Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules (Princeton, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bartling, Björn, Fehr, Ernst and Özdemir, Yagiz, 2021. “Does Market Interaction Erode Moral Values?,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, February: 1–32 [https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01021].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartling, Björn, Weber, Roberto A. and Yao, Lan, 2014. “Do Markets Erode Social Responsibility?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130 (1): 219–266 [https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju031].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S., 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, Jens, 2009. “The Social Order of Markets,” Theory and Society, 38: 245–269 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9082-0].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckert, Jens, 2012. “The Moral Embeddedness of the Economy: From Theories of Differentiation and Economic Efficiency to a Theory of Economic Fields,” Berliner Journal Für Soziologie, 22 (2): 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, Roland and Tirole, Jean, 2011. “Identity, Morals, and Taboos: Beliefs as Assets,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (2): 805–855 [https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr002].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergeron, Henri, Castel, Patrick and Dubuisson-Quellier, Sophie, 2018. Le Biais Comportementaliste (Paris, Presses de Sciences Po).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, Christian, 2015. “Behavioural Economics, Experimentalism and the Marketization of Development,” Economy and Society, 44 (4): 567–591 [https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1043794].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhme, Juliane, 2016. “‘Doing’ Laboratory Experiments: An Ethnomethodological Study of the Performative Practice in Behavioral Economic Research,” in Boldyrev, I. and Svetlova, E., eds, Enacting Dismal Science: New Perspectives on the Performativity of Economics (New York, Palgrave Macmillan US: 87–108) [https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_4LB-Böhme2016].Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Ève, 1999. Le Nouvel Esprit Du Capitalisme (Paris, Editions Gallimard).Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, 2008. “Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens May Undermine “The Moral Sentiments”: Evidence from Economic Experiments,” Science 320: 1605–1609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowles, Samuel, 2011. “Is Liberal Society a Parasite on Tradition?,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39 (1): 46–81 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01201.x].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, 2016.
The Moral Economy
. Why Good Incentives Are No Substitue for Good Citizens (Cambridge, Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel and Carlin, Wendy, 2020. “Shrinking Capitalism,” AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110: 372–377 [https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201001].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jason, 2016. “Do Markets Corrupt?,” in Baker, J. A. and White, M. D., eds, Economics and the Virtues: Building a New Moral Foundation (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 236–255).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, Friedrich and Weimann, Joachim, 2015. “Of Morals, Markets and Mice: Be Careful Drawing Policy Conclusions from Experimental Findings!,” European Journal of Political Economy, 40: 387–390 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.06.003].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, Luigino and Sugden, Robert, 2007. “The Road Not Taken: How Psychology Was Removed from Economics, and How It Might Be Brought Back,” The Economic Journal, 117 (516): 146–173 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02005.x].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykov, Andrey, 2018. “Rediscovering the Moral: The “Old” and “New” Sociology of Morality in the Context of the Behavioural Sciences,” Sociology, 53 (1): 192–207 [https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518783967].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, Koray and Callon, Michel, 2009. “Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy towards Processes of Economization,” Economy and Society, 38 (3): 369–398 [https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903020580].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel, 1998. “Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics,” The Sociological Review, 46 (1): 1–57 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1998.tb03468.x].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, Colin and Loewenstein, George, 2004. “Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future,” in Camerer, C, Loewenstein, G. and Rabin, M., eds, Advances in Behavioral Economics (Princeton, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, Luís Francisco and Rodrigues, João, 2015. “Are Markets Everywhere? Understanding Contemporary Processes of Commodification,” in Davis, J. B. and Dolfsma, W., The Elgar Companion to Social Economics , Second Edition (Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing: 267–286) [https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478545.00028].Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H., 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Davis, Douglas D. and Holt, Charles A., 1993. Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhami, Sanjit S. and Al-Nowaihi, Ali, 2019. “Human Ethicality: Evidence and Insights from Behavioral Economics,” in White, M. D., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and Economics (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dowell, Richard S., Goldfarb, Robert S. and Griffith, William B., 1998. “Economic Man as a Moral Individual,” Economic Inquiry, 36 (4): 645–653 [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01742.x].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergen, Timur and Kohl, Sebastian, 2020. “Rival Views of Economic Competition,” Socio-Economic Review, October [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa041].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai, 2018. Happiness Is the Wrong Metric: A Liberal Communitarian Response to Populism (Springer International Publishing, Springer Open) [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0008-6].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Armin, Neuber, Tobias and Szech, Nora, 2020. “Diffusion of Being Pivotal and Immoral Outcomes,” The Review of Economic Studies, 87 (5): 2205–2229 [https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz064].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Armin and Szech, Nora, 2013. “Morals and Markets,” Science, 340 (6133): 707–711 [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6133/707.abstract].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, Ernst and Fischbacher, Urs, 2002. “Why Social Preferences Matter––The Impact of Non-Selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives,” The Economic Journal, 112: C1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, Fischbacher, Urs and Gächter, Simon, 2002. “Strong Reciprocity, Human Cooperation, and the Enforcement of Social Norms,” Human Nature, 13: 1–25 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehr, Ernst and Gintis, Herbert, 2007. “Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations,” Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, 2017. “The Fly and the Cookie: Alignment and Unhingement in 21st-Century Capitalism,” Socio-Economic Review, 15 (3): 661–678 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx032].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, 2018. “Economics: The View from Below,” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 154 (1): 5 [https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-017-0019-2].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fourcade, Marion and Healy, Kieran, 2007. “Moral Views of Market Society,” Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 285–311 [https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131642].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, Ollion, Etienne and Algan, Yann, 2015. “The Superiority of Economists,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29 (1): 89–114 [https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.1.89].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Robert H., 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions (New York W. W. Norton & Co).Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine, 2019. “Bounded Sociality: Behavioural Economists,” Truncated Understanding of the Social and Its Implications for Politics,” Journal of Economic Methodology, 26 (3): 243–258 [https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625217].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Jegen, Reto, 2001. “Motivation Crowding Theory,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 15 (5): 589–611 [https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00150].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe and Moore, Bernard J., 2001. “Some Doubts about Measuring Self-Interest Using Dictator Experiments: The Costs of Anonymity,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46 (3): 271–290 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268101001780].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gächter, Simon and Schulz, Jonathan F., 2016. “Intrinsic Honesty and the Prevalence of Rule Violations across Societies,” Nature, 531 (496) [https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17160; https://www.nature.com/articles/nature17160#supplementary-information].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geiger, Niels, 2017. “The Rise of Behavioral Economics: A Quantitative Assessment,” Social Science History, 41 (3): 555–583 [https://doi.org/DOI:10.1017/ssh.2017.17].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, 2016. Individuality and Entanglement (Princeton/Oxford, Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, Bowles, Samuel, Boyd, Robert and Fehr, Ernst, 2005.
Moral Sentiments and Material Interests
. The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life (Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press).Google Scholar
Griffen, Zachary and Timmermans, Stefan, 2020. “The Cost of Saving Babies: How Economists Justify Policies,” Economy and Society, 49 (2): 265–286 [https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1690277].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, Francesco, 2001. “Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 32 (3): 453–477 [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00008-5].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, Francesco, 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, Francesco, 2010. “Experimental Economics, History Of,” in St. Durlauf, N. and Blume, L. E., Behavioral and Experimental Economics (London, Palgrave Macmillan UK: 99–106) [https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280786_13].Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. and McPherson, Michael S., 1993. “Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy,” Journal of Economic Literature, 31 (2): 671–731 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2728513].Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M., McPherson, Michael and Satz, Debra, 2017. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy . Third Edition (New York, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Healy, Kieran, 2010. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, Gintis, Herbert, McElreath, Richard, et al. 2005. ““Economic Man” in Cross-Cultural Perspective: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28 (06): 795–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herfeld, Catherine, 2020. “The Diversity of Rational Choice Theory: A Review Note,” Topoi, 39: 329–347 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9588-7].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Benedikt, Thöni, Christian and Gächter, Simon, 2008. “Antisocial Punishment across Societies,” Science, 319 (5868): 1362–1367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, 2019. “Creating Social Ontology: On the Performative Nature of Economic Experiments,” in Kawagoe, T. and Takizawa, H., eds, Diversity of Experimental Methods in Economics (Singapore, Springer: 185–203) [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6065-7_10].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heukelom, Floris, 2011. “What to Conclude from Psychological Experiments: The Contrasting Cases of Experimental and Behavioral Economics,” History of Political Economy, 43 (4): 649–681 [https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1430274].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heukelom, Floris, 2014. Behavioral Economics: A History (New York, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O., 1982. “Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble?,” Journal of Economic Literature, 20 (4): 1463–1484 [https://doi.org/10.2307/2724829].Google Scholar
Hirschman, Daniel and Berman, Elizabeth Popp, 2014. “Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economics,” Socio-Economic Review, 12 (4): 779–811 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu017].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2015. Conceptualizing Capitalism (Chicago, The University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2020. “How Mythical Markets Mislead Analysis: An Institutionalist Critique of Market Universalism,” Socio-Economic Review, 18 (4): 1153–1174 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy049].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudik, Marek, 2019. “Two Interpretations of the Rational Choice Theory and the Relevance of Behavioral Critique,” Rationality and Society, 31 (4): 464–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugh-Jones, David, 2016. “Honesty, Beliefs about Honesty, and Economic Growth in 15 Countries,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 127: 99–114 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.04.012].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irlenbusch, Bernd and Saxler, David J., 2019. “The Role of Social Information, Market Framing, and Diffusion of Responsibility as Determinants of Socially Responsible Behavior,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80: 141–161 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.04.001].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos, 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchler, Michael, Huber, Jürgen, Stefan, Matthias and Sutter, Matthias, 2016. “Market Design and Moral Behavior,” Management Science, 62 (9): 2615–1625 [https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2246].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koos, Sebastian and Sachweh, Patrick, 2019. “The Moral Economies of Market Societies: Popular Attitudes towards Market Competition, Redistribution and Reciprocity in Comparative Perspective,” Socio-Economic Review, 17 (4): 793–821 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx045].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. and List, John A., 2007. “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal about the Real World?,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (2): 153–174 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/30033722].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luetge, Christoph and Rusch, Hannes, 2013. “The Systematic Place of Morals in Markets,” Science, 341: 714 [https://doi.org/10.1126/science.341.6147.714-a].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massengill, Rebekah P. and Reynolds, Amy, 2010. “Moral Discourse in Economic Contexts,” in St. Hitlin and St. Vaisey, Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ( New York, Springer : 485–501) [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_26].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N., 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, McDonnell Erin, Stoltz, Dustin S. and Taylor, Marshall A., 2020. “Multiple Market Moralities: Identifying Distinct Patterns in How Consumers Evaluate the Fairness of Price Changes,” Socio-Economic Review, October [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa034].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S., 2006. “Economic Man as Model Man: Ideal Types, Idealization and Caricatures,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28 (1): 1–27 [https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/economic-man-as-model-man-ideal-types-idealization-and-caricatures/C8AE6F04936726C1DCA3E46403649A02].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, Fabian and Callon, Michel, 2007. “Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets,” in MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F and Siu, L., Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press: 163–189).Google Scholar
Nik-Khah, Edward and Mirowski, Philip, 2019. “On Going the Market One Better: Economic Market Design and the Contradictions of Building Markets for Public Purposes,” Economy and Society, 48 (2): 268–294 [https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1576431].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikiforakis, Nikos and Slonim, Robert, 2019. “Editors’ Preface: Trends in Experimental Economics (1975–2018).” Journal of the Economic Science Association 5 (2): 143–148 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-019-00082-0].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otteson, James R., 2019. “Humane Markets: The Classical Tradition of Political Economy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and Economics, edited by, M. D. White, 295–315. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Panhans, Matthew T. and Singleton, John D., 2017. “The Empirical Economist’s Toolkit: From Models to Methods.” History of Political Economy, 49 (Supplement): 127-157 [https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-4166299].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, Charles R., 1982. “Industrial Organization Theory and Experimental Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, 20 (4): 1485–1527 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2724830].Google Scholar
Rizvi, Abu Turab, 2005. “Experimentation, General Equilibrium and Games,” In The Experiment in the History of Economics, edited by Fontaine, Philippe and Leonard, Robert, 43–61. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Lionel, 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (London, Macmillan) [https://doi.org/10.2307/2342397].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, Philip, 2016. “Performativity Matters: Economic Description as a Moral Problem.” In Enacting Dismal Science: New Perspectives on the Performativity of Economics, edited by Boldyrev, I. and Svetlova, E., 131–150. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Eckehard F., 2000. “What Is a Market? On the Methodology of a Contested Concept,” Review of Social Economy, 58 (4): 455–482 [https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760050204300].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., 1995. “Introduction to Experimental Economics,” in Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E., The Handbook of Experimental Economics (Princeton, Princeton University Press: 3–109).Google Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., 2007. “Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (3): 37–58 [http://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.21.3.37].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., 2018. “Marketplaces, Markets, and Market Design,” American Economic Review, 108 (7): 1609–1658 [https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.108.7.1609].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandel, Michael J., 2013. “Market Reasoning as Moral Reasoning: Why Economists Should Re-Engage with Political Philosophy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (4): 121–140 [http://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.27.4.121].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Ana Cordeiro, 2010. The Social Epistemology of Experimental Economics (London/New York, Routledge).Google Scholar
Santos, Ana Cordeiro and Rodrigues, João, 2014. “Neoliberalism in the Laboratory? Experimental Economics on Markets and Their Limits,” New Political Economy, 19 (4): 507–533 [https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.829433].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, Debra, 2010. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets (New York, Oxford University Press) [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311594.001.0001].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg, 1978. The Philosophy of Money. Third Enlarged Edition, edited by Frisby, David (London/New York, Routledge).Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, (1759) 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, (1776) 1994. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (New York, Modern Library).Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L., 1962. “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, 70 (2): 111–37 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1861810].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Vernon L., 1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory,” American Economic Review, 66 (2): 274–279.Google Scholar
Smith, Vernon L., 2003. “Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics,” American Economic Review, 93 (3): 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Vernon L., 2013. “Adam Smith: From Propriety and Sentiments to Property and Wealth,” Forum for Social Economics, 42 (4): 283–297 [https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2013.798241].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Philippe, 2001. “The Sociology of Economic Knowledge,” European Journal of Social Theory, 4 (4): 443–458 [https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310122225253].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, 2010. “Does ‘Behavioural Economics’ Offer an Alternative to the Neoclassical Paradigm? (Discussion Forum II: Behavioural Economics),” Socio-Economic Review, 8 (2): 387–397 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq002].Google Scholar
Stringham, Edward Peter, 2011. “Embracing Morals in Economics: The Role of Internal Moral Constraints in a Market Economy,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 78 (1): 98–109 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.12.011].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, Matthias, Huber, Jürgen, Kirchler, Michael, Stefan, Matthias, and Walzl, Markus, 2020. “Where to Look for the Morals in Markets?,” Experimental Economics, 23: 30–52 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09608-zLB-Sutter2019].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaney, James A., 1983. “Rival and Missing Interpretations of Market Society: A Comment on Hirschman,” Journal of Economic Literature, 21 (4): 1489–1493.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard, 1994. “Markets as Social Structures,” in Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R, eds, The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press: 255–282).Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard, 1980. “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1 (1): 39–60 [https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson E, P., 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” Past & Present, no. 50 (February): 76–136 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/650244].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel, 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185 (4157): 1124–1131 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1738360].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, Roberto and Dawes, Robyn, 2005. “Behavioral Economics,” in Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R., eds, The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Second Edition, 90–108 (Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Zafirovski, Milan, 2014. “Rational Choice Requiem: The Decline of an Economic Paradigm and Its Implications for Sociology,” The American Sociologist, 45 (4): 432–452 [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9230-0].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zak, Paul J., 2011. “Moral Markets,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77 (2): 212–233 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268110001812].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarri, Luca, 2010. “Behavioral Economics Has Two ‘Souls’: Do They Both Depart from Economic Rationality?,” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39 (5): 562–567 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105353570900081X].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 1989. “The Social Meaning of Money: ‘Special Monies,’” American Journal of Sociology, 95 (2): 342–377 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780903].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A., 2005. The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Zelizer Rotman, Viviana A., 2017. Morals and Markets: The Development of Life Insurance in the United States (New York, Columbia University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanitsar supplementary material
Methodological Appendix
PDF
356.1 KB