Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A global trend toward law and order harshness?

  • Georg Wenzelburger (a1)
Abstract

A popular claim made by criminologists argues that globalization has created a general punitive turn in Western industrialized countries and led to much harsher law and order policies. The present paper challenges this view and adds to the literature in two respects as follows: first, it presents empirical evidence that substantial differences in law and order policies remain between Western industrialized countries even when law and order policy is measured in a much more finely grained manner than previously. Second, the paper provides empirical evidence for a persisting influence of the partisan ideology of governments and the party system characteristics of a country on its law and order policies: whereas the general trend of increasing economic globalization may well set the overall tone, this impact is conditioned by national political and institutional settings – and the ideology of the government as well as the party system in particular.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: georg.wenzelburger@sowi.uni-kl.de
References
Hide All
Aas, K.F. (2013), Globalization & Crime, 2nd edn., London: Sage.
Adam, A., Kammas, P. and Lagou, A. (2013), ‘The effect of globalization on capital taxation: what have we learned after 20 years of empirical studies?’, Journal of Macroeconomics 35: 199209.
Barker, F. and McLeay, E. (2000), ‘How much change?: An analysis of the initial impact of proportional representation on the New Zealand parliamentary party system’, Party Politics 6(2): 131154.
Bartlett, T. (2009), The Power of Penal Populism: Public Influences on Penal and Sentencing Policy in New Zealand from 1999 to 2008, Wellington: Victoria University, School of Social and Cultural Studies.
Bauman, Z. (1999), In Search of Politics, 1st edn., Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, N. (2001), ‘Time-series-cross-section data: what have we learned in the past few years?’, Annual Review of Political Science 4: 271293.
Beck, N. and Katz, J. (1995), ‘What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review 89(3): 634647.
Beck, N. and Katz, J. (2011), ‘Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data’, Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331352.
Beck, U. (1986), Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (2011), Weltrisikogesellschaft: auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (1994), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, 1st edn., Cambridge: Polity Press.
Becker, G.S. (1976), The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Beckett, K. (1997a), Making Crime Pay, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Beckett, K. (1997b), ‘Political preoccupation with crime leads, not follows, public opinion’, Overcrowded Times 5: 811.
Blomquist, W. (1999), ‘The policy process and large-N comparative studies’, in P. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 201230.
Bottoms, A. (1995), ‘The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing’, in C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds), The Politics of Sentencing Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1749.
Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. and Golder, M. (2006), ‘Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analysis’, Political Analysis 14(1): 6382.
Castles, F.G. (ed.) (1982), The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States, London: Sage.
Cavadino, M. and Dignan, J. (2006), Penal Systems – A Comparative Approach, London: Sage.
Chiricos, T.G. and Delone, M.A. (1992), ‘Labor surplus and punishment: a review and assessment of theory and evidence’, Social Problems 39(4): 421446.
De Boef, S. and Keele, L. (2008), ‘Taking time seriously’, American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 184200.
Downes, D. (2011), ‘Comparative criminology, globalization and the “Punitive Turn”’, in D. Nelken (ed.), Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalization, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 2747.
Downes, D. and Hansen, K. (2006), ‘Welfare and punishment in comparative perspective’, in S. Armstrong and L. McAra (eds), Perspectives on Punishment, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 101118.
Downes, D. and Morgan, R. (2007), ‘No turning back: the politics of law and order into the millennium’, in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201240.
Dreher, A. (2006), ‘Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization’, Applied Economics 38(10): 10911110.
Epifanio, M. (2011), ‘Legislative response to international terrorism’, Journal of Peace Research 48(3): 399411.
Farrall, S. and Jennings, W. (2012), ‘Policy feedback and the criminal justice agenda: an analysis of the economy, crime rates, politics and public opinion in post-war Britain’, Contemporary British History 26(4): 467488.
Garland, D. (2000), ‘The culture of high crime societies’, British Journal of Criminology 40: 347375.
Garland, D. (2001), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Golosov, G.V. (2011), ‘Party system classification: a methodological inquiry’, Party Politics 17(5): 539560.
Gottfredson, M.R. and Hindelang, M.J. (1979), ‘A study of “The Behavior of Law”’, American Sociological Review 44(1): 318.
Gottschalk, M. (2008), ‘Hiding in plain sight: American politics and the carceral state’, Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 235260.
Green, D.A. (2007), ‘Comparing penal cultures: child-on-child homicide in England and Norway’, in M. Tonry (ed.), Crime, Punishment, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 591643.
Häusermann, S., Picot, G. and Geering, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking party politics and the welfare state’, British Journal of Political Science 43(1): 221240.
Heichel, S., Knill, C. and Schmitt, S. (2013), ‘Public policy meets morality: conceptual and theoretical challenges in the analysis of morality policy change’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(3): 318334.
Hofferbert, R.I. (1974), The Study of Public Policy, Indianapolis, IN and New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
Hope, T. and Sparks, R. (eds) (2000), Crime, Risk, and Insecurity. Law and Order in Everyday Life and Political Discourse, London: Routledge.
Huber, G.A. and Gordon, S.C. (2004), ‘Accountability and coercion: is justice blind when it runs for office?’, American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 247263.
Immergut, E. (1990), ‘Institutions, veto points, and policy results: a comparative analysis of health care’, Journal of Public Policy 10(4): 391416.
Jacobs, D. and Helms, R. (2001), ‘Toward a political sociology of punishment: politics and changes in the incarcerated population’, Social Science Research 30(2): 171194.
Jahn, D. (2010), ‘The veto player approach in macro-comparative politics: concepts and measurement’, in T. König, G. Tsebelis and M. Debus (eds), Reform Processes and Policy Change. Veto Players and Decision-Making in Modern Democracies, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 4368.
Kam, C.D. and Franzese, R.J. (2007), Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M.D. (2006), Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and the OECD 1990–2003, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kury, H. and Ferdinand, T.N. (2011), ‘Punitivity. An introduction’, in H. Kury and T.N. Ferdinand (eds), International Perspectives on Punitivity, Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Brockmeyer, pp. 112.
Lacey, N. (2008), The Prisoners’ Dilemma, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lacey, N. (2010a), ‘Differentiating among penal states’, The British Journal of Sociology 61(4): 778794.
Lacey, N. (2010b), ‘Système électoral et politiques criminelles: la dynamique de la représentation proportionelle face au système du “winner-takes-all”’, Jus Politicum 4: 124.
Lacey, N. (2011), ‘The prisoners’ dilemma and political systems: the impact of proportional representation on criminal justice in New Zealand’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 42(4): 615638.
Lacey, N. (2012), ‘Punishment in the perspective of comparative political economy’, Kriminologisches Journal 44(1): 931.
Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2014), ‘Imprisonment and penal demands’, in S. Body-Gendrot, et al. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of European Criminology, London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 295336.
Laver, M. and Hunt, B. (1992), Policy and Party Competition, New York, NY: Routledge.
Levitt, S.D. (2002), ‘Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effects of police on crime: reply’, The American Economic Review 92(4): 12441250.
Matthews, R. (2005), ‘The myth of punitiveness’, Theoretical Criminology 9(2): 175201.
Medina-Ariza, J. (2006), ‘Politics of crime in Spain, 1978–2004’, Punishment & Society 8(2): 183201.
Miller, L. (2008), The Perils of Federalism. Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, R. (2006), ‘With respect to order, the rules of the game have changed: new labour’s dominance of the “Law and Order” agenda’, in T. Newburn and R. Morgan (eds), The Politics of Crime Control. Essays in Honour of David Downes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91115.
Muncie, J. (2011), ‘On globalisation and exceptionalism’, in D. Nelken (ed.), Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalization, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 87105.
Newburn, T. (2006), ‘Contrasts in intolerance: cultures of control in the United States and Britain’, in T. Newburn and R. Morgan (eds), The Politics of Crime Control: Essays in Honour of David Downes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227270.
Newburn, T. (2007), ‘“Tough on Crime”: penal policy in England and Wales’, Crime and Justice 36(1): 425470.
Norris, P. (2007), ‘Expenditure on public order and safety’, in F.G. Castles (ed.), The Disappearing State, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 133158.
Norris, P. (2009), ‘Families of nations, victimisation and attitudes towards criminal justice’, International Review of Victimology 16(3): 229255.
Pappi, F.U. and Shikano, S. (2004), ‘Ideologische Signale in den Wahlprogrammen der deutschen Bundestagsparteien 1980–2002’. Working Paper No. 2994 (76), Mannheim: MZES.
Pease, K. (1994), ‘Cross-national imprisonment rates: limitations of method and possible conclusions’, British Journal of Criminology 34(5): 116130.
Plümper, T., Troeger, V. and Manow, P. (2005), ‘Panel data analysis in comparative politics: linking method to theory’, European Journal of Political Research 44(2): 327354.
Pratt, J. (2007), Penal Populism, Milton Park/New York: Routledge.
Pratt, J. and Clark, M. (2005), ‘Penal populism in New Zealand’, Punishment & Society 7(3): 303322.
Ragin, C.C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry. Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Roberts, J.V., Stalans, L.J., Indermaur, D. and Hough, M. (2003), Penal Populism and Public Opinion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rusche, G. and Kirchheimer, O. (1968), Punishment and Social Structure, New York, NY: Russell & Russell.
Sabatier, P.A. (1991), ‘Toward better theories of the policy process’, PS: Political Science and Politics 24(2): 147156.
Savelsberg, J.J. (2011), ‘Globalization and states of punishment’, in D. Nelken (ed.), Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalization, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 6986.
Schmidt, M.G. (1996), ‘When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy’, European Journal of Political Research 30(2): 155183.
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012), Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seeberg, H.B. (2013), ‘The opposition’s policy influence through issue politicisation’, Journal of Public Policy 33(1): 89107.
Simon, J. (2007), Governing Through Crime, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singelnstein, T. and Stolle, P. (2012), Die Sicherheitsgesellschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Strange, S. (1995), ‘The limits of politics’, Government and Opposition 30(3): 291311.
Sutton, J.R. (2004), ‘The political economy of imprisonment in affluent western democracies, 1960–1990’, American Sociological Review 69(2): 170189.
Tepe, M. and Vanhuysse, P. (2013), ‘Cops for hire? The political economy of police employment in the German states’, Journal of Public Policy 33(2): 165199.
Tonry, M. (2007), Crime, Punishment, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tsebelis, G. (1995), ‘Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism’, British Journal of Political Science 25(3): 289325.
Wacquant, L. (2001), ‘The penalisation of poverty and the rise of neo-liberalism’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 9(4): 401412.
Wacquant, L. (2009), Punishing the Poor. The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Wacquant, L. (2010), ‘Crafting the neoliberal state: workfare, prisonfare, and social insecurity’, Sociological Forum 25(2): 197220.
Wenzelburger, G. (2014), ‘Parties, institutions and the politics of law and order’, British Journal of Political Science, doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000501.
Western, B. (2006), Punishment and Inequality in America, New York, NY: Sage Foundation.
Western, B. and Pettit, B. (2010), ‘Incarceration & social inequality’, Daedalus 139(3): 819.
Zedner, L. (2003), ‘Too much security?’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law 31(3): 155184.
Zedner, L. (2009), Security, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
Zohlnhöfer, R. (2009), ‘How politics matter when policies change: understanding policy change as a political problem’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11(1): 97115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Wenzelburger supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (156 KB)
156 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed