Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ideational foundations of coercion: political culture and policies towards North Korea

  • Michal Onderco (a1) and Wolfgang Wagner (a2)

The notion that states’ foreign and security policies are not exclusively driven by material interests is now firmly established. Whose ideas matter and in what way, however, has remained subject to debate. We advance this debate by studying the crisis diplomacy of liberal democracies towards North Korea during four crises around the country’s violation of international norms between 1993 and 2009. Although liberal democracies share a common perception of North Korea’s nuclear programme as a threat to international peace and security, they differ widely in either confronting or accommodating North Korea. We examine the explanatory power of two ideational driving forces behind the foreign policy of liberal democracies: the ideological orientation of the government, on the one hand, and a country’s political culture, on the other. Our analysis of 22 liberal democracies demonstrates that different domestic cultures of dealing with norm violations have a significant impact on crisis diplomacy: countries with punitive domestic cultures tend to adopt confrontational policies towards international norm violators; while left governments are not more accommodationist than right governments. Ideational differences across states are thus more pronounced than those within states.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The ideational foundations of coercion: political culture and policies towards North Korea
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The ideational foundations of coercion: political culture and policies towards North Korea
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The ideational foundations of coercion: political culture and policies towards North Korea
      Available formats
Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Arena and G. Palmer (2009), ‘Politics or the economy? Domestic correlates of dispute involvement in developed democracies’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 955975.

Z. Bauman (2000), ‘Social issues of law and order’, British Journal of Criminology 40: 205221.

T. Beck , G. Clarke , A. Groff , P. Keefer and P. Walsh (2001), ‘New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions’, The World Bank Economic Review 15: 165176.

U. Beck (1992), Risk Society, London: Sage.

B. Bridges (2003), ‘Western Europe and North Korea: new openings and old problems’, East Asia 20: 86107.

G.W. Bush (2002), ‘State of the Union Address’. Retrieved 5 June 2013 from

Correlates of War (2012), ‘National Material Capabilities’. Retrieved 20 July 2013 from

H. Döring and P. Manow (2012), ‘Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): an infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies’. Retrieved 27 March 2015 from

J.S. Duffield (1999), ‘Political culture and state behavior: why Germany confounds neorealism’, International Organization 53: 765803.

M.M. Feeley and J. Simon (1992), ‘The new penology. Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications’, Criminology 30: 449474.

M. Finnemore (1996), National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

E. Gartzke (2000), ‘Preferences and the democratic peace’, International Studies Quarterly 44: 191212.

A. Geis , H. Müller and N. Schörnig (eds) (2013), The Militant Face of Democracy: Liberal Forces for Good, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

The Guardian (2006), ‘North Korea claims first nuclear test’. Retrieved 20 August 2015 from

M.O. Hosli , M. Mattila and M. Uriot (2011), ‘Voting in the council of the European Union after the 2004 enlargement: a comparison of old and new member states’, Journal of Common Market Studies 49: 12491270.

M. Jachtenfuchs , T. Diez and S. Jung (1998), ‘Which Europe?’, European Journal of International Relations 4: 409445.

E. Kier (1997), Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

M.T. Koch (2009), ‘Governments, partisanship, and foreign policy: the case of dispute duration’, Journal of Peace Research 46: 799817.

Korea Times (2000), ‘EU has no common NK policy: Schroeder’. Korea Times, 22 October. Retrieved from LexisNexis.

M. Kroenig (2014), ‘Force or friendship? Explaining great power nonproliferation policy’, Security Studies 32: 132.

A. Lankov (2014), The Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

P. Liberman (2006), ‘An eye for an eye: public support for war against evildoers’, International Organization 60: 687722.

P Liberman (2007), ‘Punitiveness and U.S. elite support for the 1991 Persian Gulf War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 51: 332.

P Liberman (2013), ‘Retributive support for international punishment and torture’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 57: 285306.

D.H. Lumsdaine (1993), Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949-1989, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

C. Marquis (2000), ‘U.S. declares rogue nations are now states of concern’. Retrieved 3 September 2012 from

P.A. Mello (2014), Democratic Participation in Armed Conflict: Military Involvement in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

R. Morgan and A. Liebling (2007), ‘Imprisonment. An expanding scene’, in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 11001138.

J.S. Nye (1988), ‘Neorealism and neoliberalism’, World Politics 40: 235251.

P. O’malley (2010), Crime and Risk, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

M. Onderco and W. Wagner (2012), ‘Of hawks and doves. Mapping policies towards Iran and North Korea’, The Nonproliferation Review 19: 177195.

S Pinker (2011), The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence has Declined, New York, NY: Viking.

B.C. Rathbun (2004), Partisan Interventions: European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

B.C. Rathbun (2007), ‘Hierarchy and community at home and abroad: evidence of a common structure of domestic and foreign policy beliefs in American elites’, The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51: 379407.

L Ray (1999), ‘Measuring party orientations towards European integration: results from an expert survey’, European Journal of Political Research 36: 283306.

D Reiter (1999), ‘Military strategy and the outbreak of international conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 43: 366387.

S.D. Sagan and K.N. Waltz (2003), The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed, New York, NY: Norton.

J. Schuster and H. Maier (2006), ‘The rift: explaining Europe’s divergent Iraq policies in the run-up of the American-led war on Iraq’, Foreign Policy Analysis 2: 223244.

K. Seki and L.K. Williams (2014), ‘Updating the party government data set’, Electoral Studies 34: 270279.

L.J. Skitka and P.E. Tetlock (1993), ‘Providing public assistance: cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 12051223.

R.M. Stein (2015), ‘War and revenge: explaining conflict initiation by democracies’, American Political Science Review 109: 556573.

B. Verbeek and A. Zaslove (2015). The impact of populist radical right parties on foreign policy: the Northern League as a junior coalition partner in the Berlusconi Governments’, European Political Science Review 7: 525546.

E. Voeten (2004), ‘Resisting the lonely superpower: responses of states in the United Nations to U.S. dominance’, The Journal of Politics 66: 729754.

W Wagner (2002), ‘The subnational foundations of the European Parliament’, Journal of International Relations and Development 5: 2436.

W. Wagner and M. Onderco (2014), ‘Accommodation or confrontation? Explaining differences in policies towards Iran’, International Studies Quarterly 58: 717728.

K.N. Waltz (1993), ‘The emerging structure of international politics’, International Security 18: 4479.

J. Young (1999), The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime, and Difference in Late Modernity, London: Sage.

M. Barnett (1999), ‘Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo’, European Journal of International Relations 5: 136.

T. Farrell (2002), ‘Constructivist security studies: portrait of a research program’, International Studies Review 4: 4972.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Onderco and Wagner supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 88 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 321 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.