Adams J. (1999), ‘Policy divergence in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting’, Public Choice
Adams J.F. and Somer-Topcu Z. (2009), ‘Do parties adjust their policies in response to rival parties’ policy shifts? Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five democracies’, British Journal of Political Science
Adams J., Haupt A.B. and Stoll H. (2009), ‘What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies
Alesina A. and Rosenthal H. (1995),
, Divided Government and the Economy
, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Alt J.E. and Lowry R.C. (2000), ‘A dynamic model of state budget outcomes under divided partisan government’, Journal of Politics
Baumgartner F., Brouard S. and Grossman E. (2009), ‘Agenda-setting dynamics in France: revisiting the ‘partisan hypothesis’’, French Politics
Bélanger É. and Meguid B. (2008), ‘Issue Salience, Issue Ownership, and issue-based Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies
Bevan S., John P. and Jennings W. (2011), ‘Keeping party programmes on track: the transmission of the policy agendas of executive speeches to legislative outputs in the United Kingdom’, European Political Science Review
Boydstun A.E., Bevan S. and Thomas III H.F. (2014), ‘The importance of attention diversity and how to measure it’, Policy Studies Journal
Budge I. (1993), ‘Issues, dimensions, and agenda change in postwar democracies: longterm trends in party election programs and newspaper reports in twenty-three democracies’, in W. Riker (ed.), Agenda Formation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Budge I. and Farlie D. (1983), Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies, Boston: George Allen and Unwin.
Carey J.M. (2009),
Voting and Accountability
, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ceron A. (2012), ‘Bounded oligarchy: How and when factions constrain leaders in party position-taking’, Electoral Studies
Ceron A. (2013), ‘Brave rebels stay home: assessing the effect of intra-party ideological heterogeneity and party whip on roll-call votes’, Party Politics, doi: 10.1177/1354068812472581, 1–13. Published online January 24.
Cox G. (1987), The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cox G. (2000), ‘On the effects of legislative rules’, Legislative Studies Quarterly
Cox G. and McCubbins M. (1994), Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cross W. and Blais A. (2012), ‘Who selects the party leader?’, Party Politics
Dalton R. (2008), Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 5th edn., Washington, DC: CQ Press.
De Vries K. and Hobolt S. (2012), ‘When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs’, European Union Politics
Döring H. (2001), ‘Parliamentary agenda control and legislative outcomes in Western Europe’, Legislative Studies Quarterly
Döring H. (2003), ‘party discipline and government imposition of restrictive rules’, The Journal of Legislative Studies
Downs A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.
Egan P. (2013), Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Green J. and Hobolt S. (2008), ‘Owning the issue agenda: party strategies and vote choices in British elections’, Electoral Studies
Green J. and Jennings W. (2012a), The dynamics of issue competence and vote for parties in and out of power: an analysis of valence in Britain, 1979-1997’, European Journal of Political Research
Green J. and Jennings W. (2012b), Valence as macro-competence: an analysis of mood in party competence evaluations in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science
Green-Pedersen C. and Krogstrup J. (2008), ‘Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden’, European Journal of Political Research
Green-Pedersen C. and Mortensen P. (2010), ‘Who Sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda-setting’, European Journal of Political Research
Greene Zachary and Haber M. (
forthcoming), Leadership competition and disagreement at party national congresses’, British Journal of Political Science, available on CJO2014. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000283, pp. 1–22.
Harmel R. and Janda K. (1994), ‘An integrated theory of party goals and party change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics
Harmel R. and Tan A. (2003), ‘party actors and party change: does factional dominance matter?’, European Journal of Political Research
Hibbs D.A. (1977), ‘Political parties and macroeconomic policy’, American Political Science Review
Hicks A.M. and Swank D.H. (1992), ‘Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960-1982’, American Political Science Review
Huber J.D. (1992), ‘Restrictive legislative procedures in France and the United States’, The American Political Science Review
Huber J.D. (1996), Rationalizing Parliament: Legislative Institutions and Party Politics in France, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Huber J.D. and Shipan C. (2002), Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Hug S. and Schulz T. (2007), ‘Left–right positions of political parties in Switzerland’, Party Politics
Jennings W., Bevan S. and John P. (2011a), The British government’s political agenda: the speech from the throne, 1911-2008’, Political Studies
Jennings W., Bevan S., Timmermans A., Breeman G., Brouard S., Chaques L., Green-Pedersen C., John P., Palau A. and Mortensen P.B. (2011b), Effects of the core functions of government on the diversity of executive agendas’, Comparative Political Studies
John P., Bevan S. and Jennings W. (2014), ‘Party politics and policy agendas: the case of the United Kingdom’’, in C. Green-Pedersen and S. Walgrave (eds), Agenda-Setting from a Policy Theory to a Theory of Politics, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kenig O. (2009), ‘Democratization of party leadership selection: do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?’, Electoral Studies
Kitschelt H. (1989), ‘The internal politics of parties: the law of curvilinear disparity revisited’, Political Studies
Laver M. (1999), ‘Divided parties, divided government’, Legislative Studies Quarterly
Lewis-Beck M. and Stegmaier M. (2000), ‘Economic determinates of political outcomes’, Annual Review of Political Science
Lipset S.M. and Rokkan S. (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Toronto: The Free Press.
Martin L. (2004), ‘The government agenda in parliamentary democracies’, American Journal of Political Science
McAtee A., Yackee S.W. and Lowery D. (2003), ‘Reexamining the dynamic model of divided partisan government’, Journal of Politics
McGuinness F. (2012), ‘Membership of UK political parties’, House of Commons Library (Standard Note: SN/SG/5125).
Mortensen P.B., Green-Pedersen C., Breeman G., Chaqués-Bonafont L., Jennings W., John P., Palau A.M. and Timmermans A. (2011), ‘Comparing government agendas executive speeches in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Denmark’, Comparative Political Studies
Müller W. and Strøm K. (eds) (2000), Coalition Governments in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Brien D.Z. and Shomer Y. (2013), ‘A cross-national analysis of party switching’, Legislative Studies Quarterly
Petrocik J. (1996), ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study’, American Journal of Political Science
Powell B. and Whitten G. (1993), ‘A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context’, American Journal of Political Science
Schmidt M. (2006), ‘When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy’, European Journal of Political Research
Schofield N. and Sened I. (2006), Multiparty Democracy: Elections and Legislative Politics, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schumacher G. (2013), ‘When does the left do the right thing? A study of party position change on welfare policies’,
, doi: 10.1177/1354068812470505, 1–12.
Schumacher G., de Vries C. and Vis B. (2013), ‘Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives’, Journal of Politics
Seeberg H.B. (2013), ‘The opposition’s policy influence through issue politicisation’, Journal of Public Policy
Seyd P. and Whiteley P. (1992), Labour’s Grassroots: The Politics of Party Membership, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Seyd P. and Whiteley P. (2004), ‘British party members an overview’, Party Politics
Shomer Y. (2014), ‘What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination’, Party Politics
Somer-Topcu Z. (2009), ‘Timely decisions: the effects of past national elections on party policy change’, Journal of Politics
Soroka S. and Wlezien C. (2010), Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, And Policy, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Spoon J.J. (2011), Political Survival of Small Parties in Europe, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Strøm K. (1990), Minority Government and Majority Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tan A. (1997), ‘Party change and party membership decline: an exploratory analysis’, Party Politics
Tsebelis G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vliegenthart R. and Walgrave S. (2011), ‘Content matters: the dynamics of parliamentary questioning in Belgium and Denmark’, Comparative Political Studies
Whitten G. and Palmer H. (1999), ‘Cross-national analysis of economic voting’, Electoral Studies
Whiteley P. and Seyd P. (2002),
: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain
, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Whiteley P., Seyd P., Richardson J. and Bissell P. (1994), ‘Explaining party activism: the case of the British conservative party’, British Journal of Political Science
Williams L., Seki K. and Whitten G. (
forthcoming), ‘You’ve got some explaining to do: the influence of economic conditions and spatial competition on party strategy’, Political Science and Research Methods.