Hostname: page-component-546b4f848f-hhr79 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-05-31T19:05:27.344Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

An Unknown Masterpiece: On Pak Kyongni’s Land and World Literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2015

Sowon S. Park*
Faculty of English, St. Cross Building, Oxford University, OX1 3UL, UK. E-mail:


This article explores some of the issues that prevent the existence of a more diverse canon in the field of world literature. It discusses extra-literary issues that have been effectively displaced onto the question of literary quality and outlines some of the concrete hurdles that face minority literatures, with reference to the literature of modern East Asia (China, Korea and Japan). The final section examines Pak Kyongni’s Land (1969–1994), a novel virtually unknown outside of Korea but revered there as the national epic. The discussion of a work that is regarded as ‘the best that has been thought and said in the world’ by one nation yet remains practically unknown to the world will bring to the fore issues of ranking and status produced by the ‘worldification’ of literatures. In the process, it will consider some of the dynamics between nationality and universality, the relations between literature and nation, and what it means for literatures to be in dialogue when literatures and literary histories have been defined along national lines.

Focus: A Dialogue of Cultures
© Academia Europaea 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


References and Notes

1.Arnold, M. (1978 [1869]) Preface. In: Culture and Anarchy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 190.Google Scholar
2.D’haen, T., Domínguez, C., and Thomsen, M. R. (eds) (2013) World Literature: A Reader (London and New York: Routledge), p. 11.Google Scholar
3.Wallerstein, I. (2003) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
4.Europe and the West are used as superstructural rather than geographical terms to refer to Western Europe and North America.Google Scholar
5.Ying, Li-Hua (2010) Historical Dictionary of Modern Chinese Literature (Plymouth: The Scarecrow Press), p. xxiv.Google Scholar
6.Rimer, J. T. and Gessel, V. C. (eds) (2005) The Columbia Anthology of Modern Japanese Literature (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 8.Google Scholar
7.Zong, In-Sob (1982) A Guide to Korean Literature (New Jersey: Hollym International), p. 9.Google Scholar
8.Beasley, W. G. (1987) Japanese Imperialism 1894–1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
9.Arnason, J. P. (2002) The Peripheral Centre (Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press).Google Scholar
10.Scott Miller, J. (2001) Adaptations of Western Literature in Meiji Japan (NY: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Neubauer, J. (2013) Globalizing literary history: national histories of literature. Interlitteraria, 18(1), p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Casanova, P. (2004 [1999]) The World Republic of Letters, trans. M. B. Debevoise (Boston: Harvard University Press), p. xi.Google Scholar
13.Paik, N.-C. (1993) Toward a concept of national literature. Originally in Wolgan Jungang (1974), translated and revised as: The idea of a Korean national literature then and now. Positions, 1(3) (Duke University Press), p. 559.Google Scholar
14.Naipaul, V. S. (2007) A Writer’s People (London: Picador), p. 41.Google Scholar
15.Although Land, published by Nanam, is in 21 volumes, the number of volumes differs according to publishers.Google Scholar
16.Damrosch, D. (2003) What is World Literature? (Princeton: Princeton University Press), p. 281.Google Scholar
17.Jones, A. (1994) Chinese literature in the ‘World’ literary economy. Modern Chinese Literature, 8(1–2) (Spring/Fall), p. 181.Google Scholar
18.Choe, Y. (2008) Pak Kyongni as the person I knew. MunHak Sasang, June, p. 35.Google Scholar