Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:30:41.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building a typology of cropping practices from comparison with a technical reference: first step for a relevant cropping system redesigning process – results for tropical citrus production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

Fabrice Le Bellec ,
Philippe Cattan ,
Muriel Bonin  and
Amélie Rajaud
Fabrice Le Bellec
Affiliation:
CIRAD-Persyst, UPR HortSys, TA B-103 / PS4, Blvd. de la Lironde, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
Philippe Cattan
Affiliation:
CIRAD-Persyst, UPR Systèmes bananes et ananas, Stn. Neufchâteau, Sainte-Marie, 97130 Capesterre-Belle-Eau, France
Muriel Bonin
Affiliation:
CIRAD-ES, UMR TETIS, TA C-91 / F-Campus Int. Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
Amélie Rajaud
Affiliation:
CIRAD-Persyst, UPR HortSys, Stn. Bassin-Plat, BP 180, 97455 Saint-Pierre, France
Get access

Abstract

Introduction. Farm typologies and cropping practice typologies generally aim at seeking determinants of existing crop management strategies. They constitute the first step for setting improvement goals for cropping systems. Though there are a host of farm typology methods, few deal specifically with farmers’ practices, and even fewer investigate the correlations between practices. We propose here a framework for analysing the determinants of crop management, based on a vision of a crop management sequence condensed into logical combinations of cropping techniques. Materials and methods. This analytical framework was applied to the case of Guadeloupian citrus production, using a representative sample of 41 producers. Three stages were necessary to implement our analytical framework. At stage 1, logical and ordered combinations of cropping practices (CCPs), constitutive of observed as well as reference crop managements (RCMs), were identified through expert analysis. Based on measurements of deviations between farmers’ CCPs and RCMs’ CCPs, a typology of cropping practices was next built. At stage 2, the performances of farmers’ crop managements were evaluated using relevant indicators. Finally, at stage 3, constraints – either related to the environment or to the whole farm management – that determined producers’ cropping practices were identified for making, with the stakeholders, proposals for further technical improvements. Results. Crop management sequences were condensed into five CCPs. A technical profile was then determined for every producer, before a multiple correspondence factorial analysis was run. It identified two groups of producers with contrasting technical profiles. The collective analysis of these results pointed out “weed management” as a major constraint on the cropping systems, revealing that the RCM was inadequate in a context of impossible mechanisation. Discussion. Restructuring complex sequences of cropping techniques into five logical combinations of techniques enabled the comparison with a reference crop management. The cropping systems’ constraints and the objectives for further improvements were then set up collectively by the farmers and social stakeholders, along with the researchers. This analysis constitutes the first stage of a process of redesigning cropping systems, and its result provides a sound basis for a participatory approach

Keywords

France (Guadeloupe)Citrussystems analysiscropping systemscultivationweed controlexpert systemsparticipationfarmersFrance (Guadeloupe)Citrusanalyse de systèmesystème de culturepratique culturaledésherbagesystème expertparticipationagriculteurFrancia (Guadalupe)Citrusanálisis de sistemassistemas de cultivocultivoescardasistemas expertosparticipaciónagricultores
Type
Original article
Information
Fruits , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , May 2011 , pp. 143 - 159
Copyright
© 2011 Cirad/EDP Sciences

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Meynard, J., Doré, T., Habib, R., L’évaluation et la conception de systèmes de culture pour une agriculture durable, Acad. Agric. Fr. 87 (2001) 223–236. Google Scholar
Loyce, C., Wery, J., Les outils des agronomes pour l’évaluation et la conception de systèmes de culture, in: Doré T., Le Bail M., Martin P., Ney B., Roger-Estrade J., L’Agronomie aujourd’hui, Ed. Quae, Versailles, France, 2006, pp. 77–98.
Kostrowicki, J., Agricultural typology concept and method, Agric. Syst. 2 (1977) 33–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valbuena, D., Verburg, P.H., Bregt, A.K., A method to define a typology for agent-based analysis in regional land-use research, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 128 (2008) 27–36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowler, D., Bradshaw, B., Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research, Food Policy 32 (2007) 25–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y.P., Chen, D., White, R.E., Willett, I.R., Edis, R., Langford, J., Farmers’ perception of environmental degradation and their adoption of improved management practices in Alxa, China, Land Degrad. Dev. 20 (2009) 336–346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daskalopoulou, I., Petrou, A., Utilising a farm typology to identify potential adopters of alternative farming activities in Greek agriculture, J. Rural Stud. 18 (2002) 95–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapey, H., Lifran, R., Valadier, A., Identifying social, economic and technical determinants of silvopastoral practices in temperate uplands: results of a survey in the Massif Central region of France, Agric. Syst. 69 (2001) 119–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biarnès, A., Rio, P., Hocheux, A., Analysing the determinants of spatial distribution of weed control practices in a Languedoc vineyard catchment, Agronomie 24 (2004) 187–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lien, G., Kumbhakar, S.C., Hardaker, J.B., Determinants of off-farm work and its effects on farm performance: the case of Norwegian grain farmers, Agric. Econ. (2010) 41 (6) 577–786. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bellec F., Herzog D., Fournier P., Mauléon H., Renard-Le Bellec V., Ramassamy M.,The integrated fruits production in Guadeloupe, in: 41st Annu. Meet. Carrib. Food Crop Soc.,AGPAC, Guadeloupe, France, 2005, 1 p.
De Roffignac L., Manuel technique – Cultures fruitières en Guadeloupe, Ed. ASSOFWI, Guadeloupe, France, 2008, 54 p.
Beauvois C., Élaboration d’une typologie des exploitations en production d’agrumes de Guadeloupe et étude des pratiques culturales, Univ. Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Mém. Master 2, Paris, France, 2006, 69 p.
Flint M.L., Integrated pest management for Citrus, 2nd ed., Div. Agric. Nat. Resour., Univ. Calif., U.S.A., 1991, 144 p.
Grisoni M., La culture des agrumes à l’île de la Réunion CIRAD Ed., Montpellier, France, 1993, 103 p.
Davies F., Albrigo L., Citrus, CAB Int., Wallingford, U.K., 1998, 254 p.
Le Bellec F., Le Bellec V., Le verger tropical – cultiver les arbres fruitiers, Orphie Editions, Paris, France, 2007, pp. 7–79.
Le Bellec F., Bonin M., Beauvois C., Renard-Le Bellec V., Tournebize R., Briand S., Denon D., Mauléon H., Petit J.M., Les producteurs d’agrumes en Guadeloupe et leurs pratiques. L’offre de formation aux producteurs en adéquation, in: Le Bellec F., La production fruitière intégrée en Guadeloupe, CIRAD, Guadeloupe, France, 2006, 1 p.
Couteux A., Lejeune V., Index phytosanitaire, ACTA Ed., Paris, France, 2008, 406 p.
Mitchell, G., May, A., McDonald, A., PICABUE: a methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development, Int. J. Sust. Dev. World 2 (1995) 104–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giupponi, C., Environmental evaluation of alternative cropping systems with impact indices of pollution, Eur. J. Agron. 8 (1998) 71–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolot, J., Debaeke, P., Principes et outils de conception, conduite et évaluation de systèmes de culture, Cah. Agric. 12 (2003) 387–400. Google Scholar
Girard, N., Catégoriser les pratiques d’agriculteurs pour reformuler un problème en partenariat. Une proposition méthodologique, Cah. Agric. 15 (2006) 261–272. Google Scholar
Darré J.P., La recherche coactive de solutions entre agents de développement et agriculteurs, Gret-Librairie, Paris, France, 2006, 112 p.
Oliver, Y.M., Robertson, M.J., Wong, M.T.F., Integrating farmer knowledge, precision agriculture tools, and crop simulation modelling to evaluate management options for poor-performing patches in cropping fields, Europ. J. Agron. 32 (2010) 40–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vereijken, P., A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms, Eur. J. Agron. 7 (1997) 235–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar