Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:54:05.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The in vivo and in vitro transmission frequencies of the tw5-haplotype in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

William Garside
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
Nina Hillman
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The recessive tω5-haplotype, a complete haplotype, is transmitted by heterozygous male mice at very high frequencies (> 0·90) in normal matings. The present studies were undertaken to determine the effects of delayed matings and in vitro fertilizations on this phenotypic expression. Males carrying the tω5-haplotype ( + / tω5) were first tested for their frequencies of transmission of the mutant 17th chromosome in both normal and delayed matings. Spermatozoa obtained from these same males were then used to fertilize eggs in vitro. The in vivo and in vitro transmission frequencies were found to be statistically equivalent in all types of inseminations. An in vitro fertilization time course study showed that the same percentages of eggs are fertilized by tω5- bearing spermatozoa when the gametes are coincubated for either 2 or 6 h. The data lead to the conclusion that the transmission frequency of the tω5-haplotype is not affected either by the length of time elapsing between insemination and fertilization or by the environment in which fertilization occurs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

Abramczuk, J., Solter, D. & Koprowski, H. (1977). The beneficial effect of EDTA on development of mouse one-cell embryos in chemically defined medium. Developmental Biology 61, 378383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, D., Alton, A. K. & Artzt, K. (1983). Genetic analysis of transmission ratio distortion by t-haplotypes in the mouse. Genetical Research 41, 2945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, D. & Dunn, L. C. (1958). Effects on embryonic development of a group of genetically similar lethal alleles derived from different populations of wild house mice. Journal of Morphology 103, 135157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, A. W. H. (1958). Influence of time of mating on the segregation ratio of alleles at the T locus in the house mouse. Nature, London 181, 786787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, A. W. H. (1972). T-locus in mice: Segregation distortion and sterility in the male. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Genetics of the Spermatozoon. (ed. Beatty, R. A. and Gluecksohn-Waelsch, S.), pp. 289305. Copenhagen: Bogtrykkeriet Forum.Google Scholar
Braden, A. W. H. & Austin, C. R. (1954). Fertilization of the mouse egg and the effect of delayed coitus and of hot-shock treatment. Australian Journal of Biological Science 7, 552565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braden, A. W. H. & Weiler, H. (1964). Transmission ratios at the T-locus in the mouse: Inter- and intra-male heterogeneity. Australian Journal of Biological Science 17, 921934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. C. (1957). Studies of the genetic variability in populations of wild house mice. II. Analysis of eight additional alleles at locus T. Genetics 42, 299311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. C. & Suckling, J. (1956). Studies of the genetic variability in wild populations of house mouse. I. Analysis of seven alleles at locus T. Genetics 41, 344352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, L. R. & Drury, L. M. (1976). Mouse sperm genotype and the rate of egg penetration in vitro. Journal of Experimental Zoology 197, 1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garside, W. & Hillman, N. (1985). A method for karyo-typing mouse blastocyst embryos developing from in vivo and in vitro fertilized eggs. Experientia 41, 11831184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropp, A. & Winking, H. (1981). Robertsonian translocations: Cytology, meiosis, segregation patterns and biological consequences of heterozygosity. Symposium of the Zoological Society, London 47, 141181.Google Scholar
Gummere, G. R., McCormick, P. J. & Bennett, D. (1986). The influence of genetic background and the homologous chromosome 17 on t-haplotype transmission ratio distortion in mice. Genetics 114, 235245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. (1984). Transmission ratio distortion in mouse t-haplotypes is due to multiple distorter genes acting on a responder locus. Cell 37, 621628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. (1986). Male sterility of the mouse t-complex is due to homozygosity of the distorter genes. Cell 44, 357363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, M. (1987). Distorter genes of the mouse t-complex impair male fertility when heterozygous. Genetical Research 49, 5760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, J. & Hillman, N. (1980 a). The in vitro transmission frequency of the t 6 allele. Nature, London 283, 479481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, J. & Hillman, N. (1980 b). The in vitro transmission frequency of the t 12 mutation in the mouse. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 60, 141151.Google ScholarPubMed
Nadijcka, M. & Hillman, N. (1975). Studies of t 6 / t 6 mouse embryos. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 33, 697713.Google ScholarPubMed
Olds-Clarke, P. & Pietz, B. (1986). Fertility of sperm from t/+ mice: Evidence that +-bearing sperm are dysfunctional. Genetical Research 47, 4952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanigisawa, K., Dunn, L. C. & Bennett, D. (1961). On the mechanism of abnormal transmission ratios at T locus in the house mouse. Genetics 46, 16351644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar