Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T08:26:15.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lack of Association of C677T Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Polymorphism with Breast Cancer Risk in Mali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Brehima Diakite*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Yaya Kassogue
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Mamoudou Maiga
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Preventive Medicine Department, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Guimogo Dolo
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Oumar Kassogue
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Jane L. Holl
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Brian Joyce
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Preventive Medicine Department, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Jun Wang
Affiliation:
Preventive Medicine Department, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Kadidiatou Cisse
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Fousseyni Diarra
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Mamadou L. Keita
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Cheick B. Traore
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Bakarou Kamate
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Sidi B. Sissoko
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Bourama Coulibaly
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Adama S. Sissoko
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Drissa Traore
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Fatoumata M. Sidibe
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Sekou Bah
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Ibrahim Teguete
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Madani Ly
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali
Sellama Nadifi
Affiliation:
Hassan II University Aïn Chock, Casablanca, Morocco
Hind Dehbi
Affiliation:
Hassan II University Aïn Chock, Casablanca, Morocco
Kyeezu Kim
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Preventive Medicine Department, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Robert Murphy
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Lifang Hou
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA Preventive Medicine Department, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Brehima Diakite; br.diakite@yahoo.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) plays a major role in the metabolism of folates and homocysteine, which in turn can affect gene expression and ultimately promote the development of breast cancer. Thus, mutations in the MTHFR gene could influence homocysteine, methionine, and S-adenosylmethionine levels and, indirectly, nucleotide levels. Imbalance in methionine and S-adenosylmethionine synthesis affects protein synthesis and methylation. These changes, which affect gene expression, may ultimately promote the development of breast cancer. We therefore hypothesized that such mutations could also play an important role in the occurrence and pathogenesis of breast cancer in a Malian population. In this study, we used the PCR-RFLP technique to identify the different genotypic profiles of the C677T MTHFR polymorphism in 127 breast cancer women and 160 healthy controls. The genotypic distribution of the C677T polymorphism in breast cancer cases was 88.2% for CC, 11.0% for CT, and 0.8% for TT. Healthy controls showed a similar distribution with 90.6% for CC, 8.8% for CT, and 0.6% for TT. We found no statistical association between the C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk for the codominant models CT and TT (p > 0.05). The same trend was observed when the analysis was extended to other genetic models, including dominant (p = 0.50), recessive (p = 0.87), and additive (p = 0.50) models. The C677T polymorphism of MTHFR gene did not influence the risk of breast cancer in the Malian samples.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Brehima Diakite et al.

1. Introduction

Breast cancer is a major public health problem in both developed and developing countries [Reference Parkin, Ferlay and Jemal1Reference Sung, Ferlay and Siegel3]. According to the Global Cancer Observatory on Cancer (GLOBOCAN 2020) report, breast cancer is the most common female cancer and the most frequently diagnosed cancer, followed by lung and prostate cancers, with 2.3 million new cases (11.7% of all cancers) and nearly 684,996 new deaths (6.9% of deaths of all registered cancers) [Reference Sung, Ferlay and Siegel3]. Two recent reports (GLOBACAN 2018 and 2020) report that breast cancer ranks as the most common cancer among women followed by cervical cancer [Reference Bray, Ferlay, Soerjomataram, Siegel, Torre and Jemal2, Reference Sung, Ferlay and Siegel3]. The onset of breast cancer is a multifactorial process that involves clinical characteristics, lifestyle, environment, and genetic factors [Reference Rosenberg, Ruddy and Tamimi4Reference Sepahi, Faust and Sturm6]. As a result, several mutations in certain genes are being investigated to better understand the mechanisms of breast cancer occurrence. However, it is important to emphasize that findings regarding involvement of these genes remain contradictory. Folates are involved in the process of carcinogenesis through the modulation of DNA methylation and the control of DNA synthesis based on daily food intake [Reference Crider, Yang, Berry and Bailey7]. It should be noted that this contribution may vary depending on the polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene. MTHFR, known as an essential enzyme in folate metabolism, is involved in the regulation and conversion of homocysteine to methionine [Reference Ducker and Rabinowitz8]. Indeed, MTHFR catalyzes the irreversible reduction of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (5,10-methylene-THF) to 5-methyl-THF. The major circulating form of folate, 5-methyl-THF, serves as a substrate for the methylation of homocysteine to methionine by using methionine synthase, which has vitamin B12 as a cofactor. Methionine enables the de novo biosynthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which is the main donor of methyl radicals in humans [Reference Crider, Yang, Berry and Bailey7, Reference Ducker and Rabinowitz8]. Many mutations have been identified in the MTHFR gene, including the substitution of a cytosine at position 677 by a thymine (C677T) [Reference Frosst, Blom and Milos9, Reference Leclerc, Sibani and Rozen10]. The distribution of this single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) varies by study population and ethnic origins [Reference Stevenson, Schwartz, Du and Adams11Reference Petrone, Bernardo, dos Santos, Abdelhay, dos Santos and Abdelhay15]. It has been reported that the TT mutant homozygote, which is associated with a significant decrease in the enzyme activity of MTHFR, is implicated in the processes of hypermethylation and hypomethylation of DNA [Reference Arruda, Persuhn and Oliveira16] and could promote the development of certain cancers, such as breast cancer [Reference Diakite, Tazzite, Hamzi, Jouhadi and Nadifi14, Reference Petrone, Bernardo, dos Santos, Abdelhay, dos Santos and Abdelhay15, Reference Hardi, Melki, Boughaleb, El Harroudi, Aissaoui and Boukhatem17].

Data in the literature about the role of C677T in modulating the risk of cancer remain controversial. Several meta-analyses and reviews indicated that the C677T variant was associated with a risk of breast cancer [Reference Heng, Lester and Tse5, Reference Petrone, Bernardo, dos Santos, Abdelhay, dos Santos and Abdelhay15, Reference Liang, Yan and Li18, Reference He and Shen19]. However, other reports have found no association [Reference Kumar, Yadav and Rai20, Reference Hedayatizadeh-Omran, Alizadeh-Navaei, Toghani-Hulari and Amjadi21]. Given the impact of the C677T polymorphism on DNA methylation, we hypothesize that this polymorphism could play a major role in the pathogenesis of breast cancer in Mali, a multiethnic, West African population. To the best of our knowledge, data on the relationship between the C677T variant of MTHFR gene and the risk of breast cancer are lacking for the Malian population. In this study, we assess the association between the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR and breast cancer risk in a sample of Malian women with breast cancer and health controls.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

Study participants with breast cancer, who were seeking care at the oncology and pathology departments of University Hospital Center of Point G, Bamako, between July 2018 and January 2020, were recruited. Health controls were recruited at the Center National de Transfusion Sanguine (CNTS) in Bamako, Mali, which facilitated the recruitment of age-matched controls to patients. Age at diagnosis, tumor location, use of contraception, menopausal status, parity, breastfeeding, family history of breast cancer, history of benign breast disease, obesity, smoking, histological type, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and metastases, were manually extracted from each patient’s operative record. Inclusion criteria of study participants with breast cancer were women of age 18–55 years with confirmed breast cancer, availability of demographic, clinical and histological information, and absence of other cancer(s) and/or chronic disease(s). Inclusion criteria for healthy control participants were women of age 18 to 55 years without any history of malignancy or chronic disease. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology/Faculty of Pharmacy (2018/63/CE/FMPOS) at the University of Sciences, Techniques, and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), and all participants provided informed consent before any study activities.

2.2. Genotyping of MTHFR C677T Polymorphism

Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood samples (5 ml of peripheral blood), using GentaPuregene Extraction Kit, Qiagen. Spectrophotometer was used to check the quantity and quality of the DNA. The PCR-RFLP technique was used to determine the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR, using the forward and reverse primers sequences, as described previously [Reference Frosst, Blom and Milos9]. A 25 μl final reaction volume containing 10 X reaction buffer, 25 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dNTP, 5 μM primers, 500 U of Taq DNA polymerase, and 100 ng genomic DNA was used to amplify C677T from MTHFR. PCR amplification conditions included an initial denaturation step for 5 minutes (min) at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles: denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min with extension at 72°C for 1 min. A final extension step was carried out at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. The C to T substitution at position 677 of MTHFR creates a restriction site with HinfI enzyme for the C677T MTHFR polymorphism. After amplification and digestion, PCR products showed one fragment of 198 bp for wild CC, three fragments of 198, 175, and 23 bp for CT and two fragments of 175 and 23 bp for TT (Figure 1). In addition, 10% of the sample was retested to ensure that the PCR results were accurate.

FIGURE 1: Genotypic profiles of the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR on agarose gel. Lane 8 represents DNA ladder; lanes 3 and 4 represent CC wild type; lanes 2 and 5 represent CT heterozygous; lanes 1 and 6 represent TT-mutated homozygous.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. The relationship between the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR and demographic, clinical, and histological characteristics was assessed using the χ 2 test. The same test was used to check Hardy−Weinberg equilibrium. The association between the C677T polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer in all genetic models (codominant: CT versus (vs.) CC and TT vs. CC, dominant: CT + TT vs. CC, recessive: TT vs CT + CC, additive: T vs C) was measured by calculating the OR with 95% confidence interval (CI). A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant in all tests.

3. Results

We recruited 127 patients with breast cancer, including 121 cases with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and 6 cases with other histological forms (glycogen-rich clear cell carcinoma, lobular carcinoma in situ, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and infiltrating adenocarcinoma) and 160 healthy controls. The mean age of patients was 43.30 ± 2.1 years and 41.2 ± 2.5 years for control subjects, respectively. Table 1 shows the clinical and histological characteristics of the breast cancer group. Among breast cancer patients, 54.7% were ≤40 years old, 59.0% had a left breast tumor, 70.1% were not using a contraceptive, 52.8% were of childbearing age with 74.8% being nulliparous, 92.1% reported no family history of breast cancer, 67.7% were not obese, and 84.3% of patients were nonsmokers. Invasive ductal carcinoma was the most prevalent histological type (95.3%) compared to other types, including glycogen-rich clear cell carcinoma, lobular carcinoma in situ, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and infiltrating adenocarcinoma. When considering the TNM classification (T, tumor size; N, nodal involvement; M, metastasis), T3, N0, and M0 were 63.0%, 56.7%, and 93.7%, respectively. No correlation was observed between the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR and clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer patients p > 0.05 (Table 1).

TABLE 1: Distribution of C677T MTHFR polymorphism by clinicopathological characteristics in the breast cancer group.

IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; X 2, chi-squared test; P = p value; N, number; BC, breast cancer; CC, wild type; CT, heterozygous; TT, mutant homozygous. Others: glycogen-rich clear cell carcinoma, lobular carcinoma in situ, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and infiltrating adenocarcinoma.

Table 2 represents the distribution of C677T MTHFR polymorphism the in breast cancer group according to genetic models. The distribution of genotypes was 88.2% for CC wild type, 11.0% for CT heterozygous, and 0.8% for TT mutant homozygous in the cases and 90.6% for CC, 8.8% for CT, and 0.6% for TT in the controls. The allelic frequencies in cases and controls were 93.7% for C, 6.3% for T, and 95.0% for C, 5.0% for T, respectively. None of the genetic models showed a significant association of the C677T polymorphism and risk of breast cancer, including the codominant model (CT vs. CC: OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.59–2.82 and TT vs. CC: 1.29, 95% CI = 0.08–20.92), dominant model (TT + CT vs. CC: OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.61–2.76; p = 0.50), recessive model (TT vs. CC + CT: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.08–20.37; p = 0.87), and additive model (T vs. C: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.62–2.61; p = 0.50) (Table 2). The distribution of genotypic and allelic frequencies was in agreement with Hardy−Weinberg equilibrium in both cases (X 2 = 0.56, p = 0.45) and controls (X 2 = 0.99, p = 0.32).

TABLE 2: Distribution of C677T MTHFR polymorphism in the breast cancer group according to genetic models.

N= number; CI: confidence interval; P: P value; TT + CT vs. CC: the dominant model; TT vs. CC + CT: the recessive model; T vs. C: the additive model;

4. Discussion

We observed that the frequency of the mutant T allele in our healthy controls (5.0%) was statistically comparable to those reported in West African countries, including, Burkina Faso (6.0%) [Reference Chillemi, Angius, Persico, Sassu, Prodi and Musumeci22], Nigeria (6%) [Reference Shi, Caprau, Romitti, Christensen and Murray23], Gambia (6.2%) [Reference Schneider, Rees, Liu and Clegg24], Togo (8.3%) [Reference Guéant-Rodriguez, Guéant and Debard25], and Ghana (8%) [Reference Rosenberg, Murata and Ikeda26]. In contrast, this frequency was lower than those observed in India (13.1%) [Reference Pooja, Carlus and Sekhar27], Morocco (24.0%) [Reference Diakite, Tazzite, Hamzi, Jouhadi and Nadifi14], Iran (21.7%) [Reference Hedayatizadeh-Omran, Alizadeh-Navaei, Toghani-Hulari and Amjadi21], Turkey (27.4%) [Reference Kaya, Karakus, Ulusoy, Ozaslan and Kara28], Brazil (31.2%) [Reference Rezende, Marson, Lima and Bertuzzo29], United States of America (31.5%) [Reference Maruti, Ulrich, Jupe and White30], Italy (41.4%) [Reference Castiglia, Sanna and Azara31], China (41.8%) [Reference Zhang, Liu, Li and Li32], and Mexico (43.2%) [Reference Calderón-Garcidueñas, Cerda-Flores, Castruita-Ávila, Gonzalez-Guerrero and Barrera-Saldana33]. The wide range distribution of the mutant T allele in healthy women appears to depend on the study population and ethnic origins.

The present case-control study revealed that the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR is not linked with the occurrence of breast cancer in a sample of women from Mali. Numerous studies have been undertaken to assess the influence of the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR in breast cancer, but the conclusions remain conflicted. Our results are consistent with previously published work, which found no significant association with risk of breast cancer [Reference Pooja, Carlus and Sekhar27Reference Rezende, Marson, Lima and Bertuzzo29, Reference Castiglia, Sanna and Azara31, Reference Calderón-Garcidueñas, Cerda-Flores, Castruita-Ávila, Gonzalez-Guerrero and Barrera-Saldana33]. Three recent meta-analyses, one comprising 75 studies with 31,315 cases and 35, 608 controls, the second comprising 39 studies with 19,260 cases and 26,364 controls, and the third comprising 67 studies with 23,440 cases and 27880 controls, showed no significant association between the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR and risk of breast cancer in Caucasian women, but not in Asian women [Reference He and Shen19, Reference Kumar, Yadav and Rai20, Reference Sharma, Lal and Sambyal34] and mixed women population [Reference Sharma, Lal and Sambyal34]. These results are in part consistent with the present study. Contrary to our findings, a meta-analysis comprising 9 studies with 2136 cases and 2436 controls showed a significant association of the C677T polymorphism with the risk of breast cancer in Latino women [Reference Meneses-Sanchez, Garcia-Hernandez and Porchia35]. The discrepancy between studies of the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR with occurrence of breast cancer could be due to sample size, ethnic origins, genetic background, linkage disequilibrium, and in particular the lifestyle of the populations studied.

Although a clear mechanism by which the MTHFR mutation promotes the development of breast cancer has not yet been fully established, the C677T polymorphism has been considered to be a variant producing a thermolabile enzyme with limited activity. This variant is the most common genetic cause of hyperhomocysteinemia [Reference Moll and Varga36, Reference Zaric, Obradovic, Bajic, Haidara, Jovanovic and Isenovic37]. In physiological situations, 5,10-methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) catalyzes the irreversible reduction of 5,10-methylene tetrahydrofolate (CH2THF) to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (CH3THF) [Reference Froese, Kopec and Rembeza38]. Thus, the activity of MTHFR affects the availability of CH2THF, which influences the synthesis of RNA and DNA. MTHFR plays a major role in folate and homocysteine metabolisms by acting on the transfer of its methyl group during the remethylation of homocysteine by methionine synthase. MTHFR can modulate the levels of homocysteine, methionine, and S-adenosylmethionine and indirectly influence the levels of nucleotide, since its substrate, 5,10-methylene tetrahydrofolate, is used for the synthesis of thymidine [Reference Froese, Kopec and Rembeza38]. The imbalance in methionine and S-adenosylmethionine synthesis affects protein synthesis or methylation reactions. Changes in DNA methylation affect gene expression, and MTHFR deficiency can promote the development of oncogenic processes [Reference Deltour, Chopin and Leprince39, Reference Leclerc and Rozen40]. The redistribution of folate metabolites can affect the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines, which in turn affects DNA synthesis or repair. Supplementation or dietary intake of appropriate vitamins can alleviate potential MTHFR deficiencies. There is still a great deal of controversy about the role of MTHFR polymorphisms. However, a link with cardiovascular disease has been established, which may then have an indirect link with risk of breast cancer [Reference Liew and Gupta41]. The C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene has been reported to be associated with an increased level of homocysteine, which may independently contribute to the development of stroke and coronary disease. The impact of the C677T polymorphism on the risk of developing of cardiovascular diseases, such as stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic), venous thrombosis, and coronary heart disease has been reported in the Caucasian and Asian populations [Reference Liew and Gupta41Reference Abhinand, Manikandan, Mahalakshmi and Ragunath44]. These observations confirm the fact that the impact of a SNP depends on the ethnic and geographical origin of the population studied.

This study has some limitations. First, the sample size is relatively small; therefore, the results cannot be generalized to the entire Malian population. Second, hormone receptor tests ((luminal A, luminal B, HER2 overexpression, and triple-negative subtypes) and blood folate levels could not be performed in the majority of patients. Determination of hormonal status enables better patient management while improving the prognosis. In addition, low blood folate levels may cause certain abnormalities such as cardiovascular and cancer diseases.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study did not show any association between the C677T polymorphism of the MTHFR gene and risk of breast cancer. The distribution of the mutant T allele was very rare in both groups of women with and without breast cancer. Further studies with a folic acid assay should be performed to evaluate the association of the C677T MTHFR polymorphism and risk of breast cancer.

Abbreviations

CHU: University Hospital Center

CI: Confidence interval

HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

LMICs: Low- and middle-income countries

MTHFR: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

OR: Odds ratio

USTTB: University of Sciences, Techniques, and Technologies of Bamako.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request and with the permission of FMPOS/USTTB Ethics Committee.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology (FMOS)/Faculty of Pharmacy (FPH) Ethics Committee (IRB No. 2018/63/CE/FMPOS), University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Mali.

Consent

All participants accepted and signed the written informed consent.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript. BD, YK, GD, MM, and LH conceptualized and designed the study. MLK, SBS, CBT, BK, BC, DT, and FMS collected clinical and pathological data and collected blood. Genetic data acquisition was done by BD, YK, OK, KC, and FD. Data analysis and interpretation were done by BD, YK, OK, MM, and GD. BD wrote the manuscript with assistance from YK, MM, GD, JLH, and LH. YK, GD, JLH, BJ, JW, KC, SBS, CBT, BK, BC, ASS, DT, FMS, SB, IT, ML, SN, HD, KK, RLM, and LH critically reviewed the manuscript for significant intellectual content.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the NCI/NIH (D43CA260658), Institute of Global Health (IGH)/Northwestern University Catalyzer and the HBNU Consortium, Fogarty International Center, and the National Institutes of Health (D43 TW010543). The authors thank all clinicians and participants in the study, Laboratoire de Recherche et de Formation sur la Pathologie Moléculaire (CREFPAM, Center of Research and Training on Molecular Pathology), Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology/University of Sciences, Techniques, and Technologies of Bamako, the University Clinical Research Center (UCRC-Mali), Intelligence Center of Excellence Mali (ICER-Mali); Prof. Seydou Doumbia, Prof. Mamadou Diakite, and Dr. Mamadou Coulibaly for logistical support.

References

Parkin, D. M., Ferlay, J., and Jemal, A., Cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, 2018.Google Scholar
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., and Jemal, A., “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394424, 2018.Google ScholarPubMed
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L. et al., “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209249, 2021.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, S. M., Ruddy, K. J., Tamimi, R. M. et al., “BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in young women with breast cancer,JAMA Oncology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 730736, 2016.10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5941CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heng, Y. J., Lester, S. C., Tse, G. M. et al., “The molecular basis of breast cancer pathological phenotypes,The Journal of Pathology, vol. 241, no. 3, pp. 375391, 2017.10.1002/path.4847CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepahi, I., Faust, U., Sturm, M. et al., “Investigating the effects of additional truncating variants in DNA-repair genes on breast cancer risk in BRCA1-positive women,BMC Cancer, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 787, 2019.10.1186/s12885-019-5946-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crider, K. S., Yang, T. P., Berry, R. J., and Bailey, L. B., “Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for folate’s role,Advances in Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2138, 2012.10.3945/an.111.000992CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducker, G. S. and Rabinowitz, J. D., “One-Carbon metabolism in health and disease,Cell Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2742, 2017.10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frosst, P., Blom, H. J., Milos, R. et al., “A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase,Nature Genetics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 111113, 1995.10.1038/ng0595-111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leclerc, D., Sibani, S., and Rozen, R., Molecular Biology of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (Mthfr) And Overview of Mutations/Polymorphisms, Landes bioscience, Austin, TX, USA, 2013.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. E., Schwartz, C. E., Du, Y. Z., and Adams, M. J., “Differences in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype frequencies, between Whites and Blacks,The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 229230, 1997.Google ScholarPubMed
Austin, H., Craig Hooper, W., Dilley, A. et al., “The prevalence of two genetic traits related to venous thrombosis in whites and african-AMERICANS,Thrombosis Research, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 409415, 1997.10.1016/S0049-3848(97)00086-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adjalla, C. E., Amouzou, E. K., and Sanni, A., “Low frequency of mutated methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C-->T and 1298A-->C genetics single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Sub-Saharan populations,Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 41, pp. 10281032, 2003.10.1515/CCLM.2003.158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diakite, B., Tazzite, A., Hamzi, K., Jouhadi, H., and Nadifi, S., “Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk in Moroccan women,African Health Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 204209, 2012.10.4314/ahs.v12i2.20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrone, I., Bernardo, P. S., dos Santos, E. C., Abdelhay, E., dos Santos, E. C., and Abdelhay, E., “MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms in breast cancer, gliomas and gastric cancer: a review,Genes, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 587, 2021.10.3390/genes12040587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arruda, I. T. S. d, Persuhn, D. C., and Oliveira, N. F. P. d, “The MTHFR C677T polymorphism and global DNA methylation in oral epithelial cells,Genetics and Molecular Biology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 490493, 2013.10.1590/S1415-47572013005000035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardi, H., Melki, R., Boughaleb, Z., El Harroudi, T., Aissaoui, S., and Boukhatem, N., “Significant association between ERCC2 and MTHR polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility in Moroccan population: genotype and haplotype analysis in a case-control study,BMC Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 292, 2018.10.1186/s12885-018-4214-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, H., Yan, Y., Li, T. et al., “Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Chinese population: a meta-analysis of 22 case–control studies,Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 16951701, 2013.10.1007/s13277-013-1234-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L. and Shen, Y., “MTHFR C677T polymorphism and breast, ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 19,260 patients and 26,364 controls,OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 10, pp. 227238, 2017.10.2147/OTT.S121472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, P., Yadav, U., and Rai, V., “Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism and breast cancer risk: evidence for genetic susceptibility,Meta Gene, vol. 6, pp. 7284, 2015.10.1016/j.mgene.2015.08.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedayatizadeh-Omran, A., Alizadeh-Navaei, R., Toghani-Hulari, F., and Amjadi, O., “Association between MTHFR (C677T) gene polymorphism with breast cancer in Northern Iran,Word Cancer Research Journal, vol. 4, Article ID e876, 2017.Google Scholar
Chillemi, R., Angius, A., Persico, I., Sassu, A., Prodi, D. A., and Musumeci, S., “Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) from mediterranean to sub-saharan areas,Online Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2834, 2006.Google Scholar
Shi, M., Caprau, D., Romitti, P., Christensen, K., and Murray, J. C., “Genotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium in the CEPH human diversity panel for variants in folate pathway genes MTHFR, MTHFD, MTRR, RFC1, and GCP2,Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 545549, 2003.10.1002/bdra.10076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, J. A., Rees, D. C., Liu, Y. T., and Clegg, J. B., “Worldwide distribution of a common methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation,The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 12581260, 1998.10.1086/301836CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guéant-Rodriguez, R.-M., Guéant, J.-L., Debard, R. et al., “Prevalence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677T and 1298C alleles and folate status: a comparative study in Mexican, West African, and European populations,The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 701707, 2006.10.1093/ajcn.83.3.701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, N., Murata, M., Ikeda, Y. et al., “The frequent 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism is associated with a common haplotype in whites, Japanese, and africans,The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 758762, 2002.10.1086/338932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooja, S., Carlus, J., and Sekhar, D., “MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer: evidence from an original study and pooled data for 28031 cases and 31880 controls,PLoS One, vol. 10, Article ID e0120654, 2015.10.1371/journal.pone.0120654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, E. F., Karakus, N., Ulusoy, A. N., Ozaslan, C., and Kara, N., “Association of the MTHFRGene C677T Polymorphism with Breast Cancer in a Turkish Population,Oncology Research and Treatment, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 534538, 2016.10.1159/000448084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezende, L. M., Marson, F. A. L., Lima, C. S. P., and Bertuzzo, C. S., “Can MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms alter the risk and severity of sporadic breast cancer in Brazilian women?,Clinical Breast Cancer, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. e199e208, 2017.10.1016/j.clbc.2017.02.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maruti, S. S., Ulrich, C. M., Jupe, E. R., and White, E., “MTHFR C677T and postmenopausal breast cancer risk by intakes of one-carbon metabolism nutrients: a nested case-control study,Breast Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 6, p. R91, 2009.10.1186/bcr2462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castiglia, P., Sanna, V., Azara, A. et al., “Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms in breast cancer: a Sardinian preliminary case-control study,International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 10891095, 2019.10.7150/ijms.32162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X. F., Liu, T., Li, Y., and Li, S., “Association between MTHFR 677C/T and 1298A/C gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk,Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1642516430, 2015.10.4238/2015.December.9.12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderón-Garcidueñas, A. L., Cerda-Flores, R. M., Castruita-Ávila, A. L., Gonzalez-Guerrero, J. F., and Barrera-Saldana, H. A., “C677T-SNP of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and breast cancer in Mexican women,Revista Medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 720724, 2017.Google ScholarPubMed
Sharma, B., Lal, H., Sambyal, V. et al., “Association of MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism with breast cancer risk: a case–control study and meta-analysis,Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 1451, 2022.Google Scholar
Meneses-Sanchez, P., Garcia-Hernandez, S. C., Porchia, L. M. et al., “C677T and A1298C methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility among Latinos: a meta-analysis,Breast Cancer, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 602611, 2019.10.1007/s12282-019-00961-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moll, S. and Varga, E. A., “Homocysteine and MTHFR mutations,Circulation, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. e6e9, 2015.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013311CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaric, B. L., Obradovic, M., Bajic, V., Haidara, M. A., Jovanovic, M., and Isenovic, E. R., “Homocysteine and hyperhomocysteinaemia,Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 29482961, 2019.10.2174/0929867325666180313105949CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froese, D. S., Kopec, J., Rembeza, E. et al., “Structural basis for the regulation of human 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase by phosphorylation and S-adenosylmethionine inhibition,Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2261, 2018.10.1038/s41467-018-04735-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deltour, S., Chopin, V., and Leprince, D., “Modifications épigénétiques et cancer,Medical Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 405411, 2005.Google ScholarPubMed
Leclerc, D. and Rozen, R., “Molecular genetics of MTHFR: polymorphisms are not all benign,Medical Science, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 297302, 2007.Google Scholar
Liew, S.-C. and Gupta, E. D., “Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism: epidemiology, metabolism and the associated diseases,European Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 58, pp. 110, 2015.10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, P., Gao, X., Zhang, Y. et al., “Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and venous thromboembolism risk in the Chinese population: a meta-analysis of 24 case-controlled studies,Angiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 422432, 2015.10.1177/0003319714546368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hou, X., Chen, X., and Shi, J., “Genetic polymorphism of MTHFR C677T and premature coronary artery disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis,Gene, vol. 565, no. 1, pp. 3944, 2015.10.1016/j.gene.2015.03.062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abhinand, P. A., Manikandan, M., Mahalakshmi, R., and Ragunath, P. K., “Meta-analysis study to evaluate the association of MTHFR C677T polymorphism with risk of ischemic stroke,Bioinformation, vol. 13, pp. 214219, 2017.10.6026/97320630013214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

FIGURE 1: Genotypic profiles of the C677T polymorphism of MTHFR on agarose gel. Lane 8 represents DNA ladder; lanes 3 and 4 represent CC wild type; lanes 2 and 5 represent CT heterozygous; lanes 1 and 6 represent TT-mutated homozygous.

Figure 1

TABLE 1: Distribution of C677T MTHFR polymorphism by clinicopathological characteristics in the breast cancer group.

Figure 2

TABLE 2: Distribution of C677T MTHFR polymorphism in the breast cancer group according to genetic models.