Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T02:57:05.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining apparent exhumation from Chalk outcrop samples, Cleveland Basin/East Midlands Shelf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Robert J. Menpes  and
Richard R. Hillis
Robert J. Menpes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Adelaide, S.A., 5005, Australia
Richard R. Hillis
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Adelaide, S.A., 5005, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Porosity measurements of 22 Upper Cretaceous Chalk samples, and mean Chalk porosities derived from sonic logs in three wells, were used to quantify apparent exhumation (height above maximum burial-depth) in the onshore Cleveland Basin/East Midlands Shelf. Late Cretaceous/Tertiary exhumation of the East Midlands Shelf resulted in the removal of 1.2 km of section near the coast and more than 2 km of section inland, to the west. The southern margin of the Cleveland Basin was exhumed by 2 km, and exhumation increases northwards towards the recognized inversion axis running east–west along the basin’s centre. The northwards increasing exhumation associated with the east–west trending inversion axis of the Cleveland Basin is superimposed upon the regional westward trend of increasing exhumation of eastern England. These two trends control the outcrop distribution of the Upper Cretaceous Chalk in the Cleveland Basin/East Midlands Shelf.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 133 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 751 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bray, R. J., Green, P. F. & Duddy, I. R. 1992. Thermal history reconstruction using apatite fission track analysis and vitrinite reflectance: a case study from the UK East Midlands Shelf and Southern North Sea. In Exploration Britain: Geological insights for the next decade, (ed. Hardman, R. F. P.), pp. 3–25. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 67.Google Scholar
Bulat, J. & Stoker, S. J. 1987. Uplift determination from interval velocity studies, UK southern North Sea. In Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe (eds Brooks, J. and Glennie, K.), pp. 293–305. London: Graham & Trotman.Google Scholar
Cameron, T. D. J., Crosby, A., Balson, P. S., Jeffery, D. H., Lott, G. K., Bulat, J. & Harrison, D. J. 1992. United Kingdom offshore regional report: the geology of the southern North Sea. London: HMSO for the British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Chadwick, R. A., Kirby, G. A. & Baily, H. E. 1994. The post-Triassic structural evolution of north–west England and adjacent parts of the East Irish Sea. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 50, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. A. & Williams, G. D. (eds) 1989. Inversion Tectonics. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 44.Google Scholar
Emerson, D. W. 1990. Notes on mass properties of rocks – density, porosity, permeability. Exploration Geophysics 21, 209–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, P. & Molnar, P. 1990. Surface uplift, uplift of rocks, and exhumation of rocks. Geology 18, 1173–7.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. F. 1989. Thermal and tectonic history of the East Midlands shelf (onshore UK) and surrounding regions assessed by apatite fission track analysis. Journal of the Geological Society, London 146, 755–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. F., Duddy, I. R. & Bray, R. J. 1995. Further discussion on Mesozoic cover over northern England: interpretation of apatite fission track data. Journal of the Geological Society, London 152, 416.Google Scholar
Hemingway, J. E. & Riddler, G. P. 1982. Basin inversion in North Yorkshire. Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B 91, B175–86.Google Scholar
Hillis, R. R. 1991. Chalk porosity and Tertiary uplift, Western Approaches Trough, SW UK and NW French continental shelves. Journal of the Geological Society, London 148, 669–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillis, R. R. 1993. Tertiary erosion magnitudes in the East Midlands Shelf, onshore UK. Journal of the Geological Society, London 150, 1047–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillis, R. R. 1994. Discussion on the amount of Tertiary erosion in the UK estimated using sonic velocity analysis (reply). Journal of the Geological Society, London 151, 1041–4.Google Scholar
Hillis, R. R. 1995. Quantification of Tertiary exhumation in the United Kingdom Southern North Sea using sonic velocity data. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 79, 130–52.Google Scholar
Hillis, R. R., Thomson, K. & Underhill, J. R. 1994. Quantification of Tertiary erosion in the Inner Moray Firth by sonic velocity data from the Chalk and Kimmeridge Clay. Marine and Petroleum Geology 11, 283–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, D. W. 1993. Mesozoic cover over northern England: interpretation of apatite fission track data. Journal of the Geological Society, London 150, 657–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, D. W. 1994. Discussion on Mesozoic cover over northern England: interpretation of apatite fission track data (reply). Journal of the Geological Society, London 151, 735–6.Google Scholar
Issler, D. R. 1992. A new approach to shale compaction and stratigraphic restoration, Beaufort-Mackenzie Basin and Mackenzie Corridor, Northern Canada. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 76, 1170–89.Google Scholar
Jankowsky, W. 1962. Diagenesis and oil accumulation as aids in the analysis of the structural history of the north-western German Basin. Zeitschrift der Deutscher Geologischer Gesellschaft 114, 452–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japsen, P. 1993. Influence of lithology and Neogene uplift on seismic velocities in Denmark: implications for depth conversion of maps. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 77, 194–211.Google Scholar
Kent, P. E. 1980. Subsidence and uplift in East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire: a double inversion. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 42, 505–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, W. H. 1978. The determination of prior depth of burial (uplift and erosion) using interval transit time. Society of Professional Well Log Analysts Nineteenth Annual Logging Symposium, June 13–16, 1978, Paper B.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. L. E., Green, P. F., Carter, A. & Hurford, A. J. 1992. Elevated K/T palaeotemperatures throughout Northwest England: three kilometres of Tertiary erosion? Earth and Planetary Science Letters 112, 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magara, K. 1976. Thickness of removed sedimentary rock, paleopore pressure, and paleotemperature, southwestern part of Western Canada Basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 60, 554–65.Google Scholar
Marie, J. P. P. 1975. Rotliegendes stratigraphy and diagenesis. In Petroleum and the Continental Shelf of North-west Europe, vol. I, Geology (ed. Woodland, A. W.), pp. 205–11. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
McCulloch, A. A. 1994. Discussion on Mesozoic cover over northern England: interpretation of apatite fission track data. Journal of the Geological Society, London 151, 735–6.Google Scholar
Menpes, R. J. & Hillis, R. R. 1995. Quantification of Tertiary exhumation from sonic velocity data, Celtic Sea/South-Western Approaches. In Basin Inversion (eds Buchanan, J. G. and Buchanan, P. G.), pp. 191–207. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 88.Google Scholar
Raiga-Clemenceau, J., Martin, J. P. & Nicoletis, S. 1988. The concept of acoustic formation factor for more accurate porosity determination from sonic transit time data. The Log Analyst 01–02 1988, 54–9.Google Scholar
Rawson, P. F. & Wright, J. K. 1992. The Yorkshire Coast. Geologists Association Guide no. 34, 117 pp.Google Scholar
Scotchman, I. C. 1994. Maturity and burial history of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, onshore UK: a biomarker study. First Break 12, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagen, J. I. 1992. Methodology applied to uplift and erosion. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 72, 307–11.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Gatliff, R. W. & Smith, N. J. P. 1994. Discussion on the amount of Tertiary erosion in the UK estimated using sonic velocity analysis. Journal of the Geological Society, London 151, 1041–4.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. A. & Bailey, H. W. 1996. The Flamborough Tertiary outlier, UK southern North Sea. Journal of the Geological Society, London 153, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, P. E. 1990. Porosities and seismic velocities of mudstones from Wairarapa and oil wells of North Island, New Zealand, and their use in determining burial history. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 33, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, A., Holliday, D. W. & Penn, I. E. 1985. Geophysical logs in British Stratigraphy. Geological Society of London Special Report no. 18.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D., Powell, C. M. & Cooper, M. A. 1989. Geometry and kinematics of inversion tectonics. In Inversion Tectonics (eds Cooper, M. A. and Williams, G. D.), pp. 3–15. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 44.Google Scholar
Wyllie, M. R. J., Gregory, A. R. & Gardner, L. W. 1956. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated Porous Solid. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 28, 168–91.Google Scholar
Ziegler, P. A. (Ed.) 1987. Compressional Intra-Plate Deformations in the Alpine Foreland. Tectonophysics 137 (special issue).Google Scholar
Ziegler, P. A. 1990. Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe, 2nd ed. Netherlands: Shell Internationale Petroleum Maatschappij BV, 233 pp.Google Scholar