Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:25:13.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description and ecology of a new Middle Ordovician (Llanvirn) odontopleurid trilobite from the Builth Inlier of Mid-Wales, with a review of the genus Meadowtownella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2011

TIM M. CONWAY  and
JOSEPH P. BOTTING
TIM M. CONWAY*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom
JOSEPH P. BOTTING
Affiliation:
Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, No. 39 Beijing Road, Nanjing, China
*
†Author for correspondence: conway.tm@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new odontopleurid trilobite, Meadowtownella serrata, is described from a new Llanvirnian (Darriwilian; Didymograptus murchisoni Biozone) locality in the Builth Inlier, Mid-Wales. This unusually spinose species displays a remarkable array of pygidial spines and extends the stratigraphic range of the genus back into the Abereiddian. Benthic faunas are rare in the predominantly ‘anoxic’ D. murchisoni Biozone of the Welsh Basin, and these beds are an unusual habitat for odontopleurids. Environmental analyses (framboidal pyrite and associated total organic carbon) in this study, together with the distribution of benthic faunas (described and figured) in the section, indicate a likely oxic water column and episodically oxic bottom waters. A new diagnosis for Meadowtownella is presented with a review of the genus, as a clarification of previous work. The greater spinosity of earlier members of the lineage may reflect either changing environmental preferences, or the derivation of Meadowtownella from an original more spinose lineage.

Keywords

OdontopleuridaeBuilth–Llandrindod InlierPrimaspisspinosityMeadowtownella
Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 149 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 397 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bancroft, B. B. 1949. Upper Ordovician trilobites of zonal value in south-east Shropshire. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, Biological Sciences 136, 291–315.Google ScholarPubMed
Barrande, J. 1852. Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême. 1ère partie: Recherches Paléontologiques. Vol. I. Trilobites. Praha & Paris, 935 pp.Google Scholar
Bergström, S. M., Finney, S. C., Xu, C., Goldman, D. & Leslie, S. A. 2006. Three new Ordovician global stage names. Lethaia 39, 287–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettley, R. M., Fortey, R. A. & Siveter, D. J. 2001. High-resolution correlation of Anglo-Welsh Middle to Upper Ordovician sequences and its relevance to international chronostratigraphy. Journal of the Geological Society 158, 937–62.Google Scholar
Bevins, R. E. & Metcalfe, R. 1993. Ordovician igneous rocks of the Builth Inlier. In Geological Excursions in Powys, Central Wales (eds Woodcock, N. H. & Bassett, M. G.), pp. 243–58. University of Wales Press/National Museum of Wales, Geological Series 14.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1863. On the parallelism of the Quebec group with the Llandeilo of England and Australia, and with the Chazy and Calciferous formations. Canadian Naturalist 8, 19–35.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1972. Geological map and notes on the Ordovician and Silurian litho- and biostratigraphy, Anticosti Island, Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 71, 1–45.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1981. Ordovician and Silurian biostratigraphy, Anticosti Island, Québec. In IUGS Field Meeting, Anticosti-Gaspé, Québec, 1981. Volume 2, Stratigraphy and Paleontology, pp. 41–59. Department de Geologie, Université De Montréal.Google Scholar
Botting, J. P. 2002. The role of pyroclastic volcanism in Ordovician diversification. In Palaeobiogeography and Biodiversity Change: The Ordovician and Mesozoic-Cenozoic Radiations (eds Crame, J. A. & Owen, A. W.), pp. 99–113. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 194.Google Scholar
Botting, J. P. & Thomas, A. T. 1999. A pseudoplanktonic inarticulate brachiopod attached to graptolites and algae. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geologica 43, 333–5.Google Scholar
Botting, J. P & Muir, L. A. 2008. Unravelling causal components of the Ordovician Radiation: the Builth Inlier (central Wales) as a case study. Lethaia 41, 111–25.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E., Whiteley, T. E., Allison, P. A. & Yochelson, E. L. 1999. The Walcott-Rust Quarry: Middle Ordovician trilobite Konservat-Lagerstätten. Journal of Paleontology 73, 288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Geological Survey. 2005. Builth Wells, England and Wales Sheet 196. Solid Geology. 1:50 000. Keyworth, Nottingham: British Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1965. The Middle Ordovician of the Oslo Region, Norway: 19. The trilobite family Odontopleuridae. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift 45, 339–56.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1966. A review of the Swedish Ordovician Odontopleuridae (Trilobita). Bulletin of the Geological Institutions of the University of Uppsala 43, 1–44.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1967. Silurian odontopleurids from Sweden, Estonia and Latvia. Palaeontology 10, 214–44.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. 1968. Ordovician odontopleurid trilobites from Estonia and Latvia. Lethaia 1, 288–302.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Übersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. Berlin: G. Reimer, 147 pp.Google Scholar
Davies, J. R., Fletcher, C. J. N., Waters, R. A., Wilson, D., Woodhall, D. G. & Zalasiewicz, J. A. 1997. Geology of the country around Llanilar and Rhayader. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, Sheets 178 and 179 (England and Wales), 267 pp.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1962. The Ordovician trilobite faunas of South Shropshire II. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History: Geological Series 5, 311–58.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T. 1963. The trilobites of the Caradoc Series in the Cross Fell inlier of Northern England. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History: Geological Series 7, 65–134.Google Scholar
Delgado, J. F. N. 1908. Système silurique du Portugal; étude de stratigraphie paléontologie. Memoires de la Commission Géologique du Portugal, Lisbon, 1–245.Google Scholar
Dunkley, P. N. 1980. Ordovician volcanicity of the SE Harlech Dome. In The Caledonides of the British Isles; reviewed (eds Harris, A. L., Holland, C. H. & Leake, B. E.), pp. 597–601. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 8.Google Scholar
Elles, G. L. 1940. The stratigraphy and faunal succession in the Ordovician rocks of the Builth-Llandrindod Inlier, Radnorshire. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 95, 338–445.Google Scholar
Finney, S. 2005. Global Series and Stages for the Ordovician System: a progress report. Geologica Acta 3, 309–16.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., Harper, D. A. T., Ingham, J. K., Owen, A. W., Parkes, M. A., Rushton, A. W. A. & Woodcock, N. H. 2000. A Revised Correlation of Ordovician Rocks in the British Isles. Geological Society Special Report no. 24. London: Geological Society of London, 83 pp.Google Scholar
Hall, P. 1847. Description of the organic remains of the lower division of the New York System. Paleontology of New York 1, 1–338.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. 2009. Trilobites of the Middle Ordovician Elnes Formation of the Oslo region, Norway. Fossils and Strata 56, 149, pl. 25.Google Scholar
Harper, D. A. T. & Owen, A. W. 1986. A shelly facies from graptolitic mudstones of the lower Balclatchie Group (Lower Caradoc) near Laggan, Girvan district. Scottish Journal of Geology 22, 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1969. The Ordovician trilobite faunas of the Builth-Llandrindod Inlier, central Wales. Part I. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History: Geological Series 18, 39–103.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1971. The Ordovician trilobite faunas of the Builth-Llandrindod Inlier, central Wales. Part II. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History: Geological Series 20, 115–82.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. P. 1979. The Ordovician trilobite faunas of the Builth-Llandrindod Inlier, central Wales. Part III. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History: Geological Series 32, 109–81.Google Scholar
Jones, O. T. & Pugh, W. J. 1941. The Ordovician rocks of the Builth district – a preliminary account. Geological Magazine 78, 185–91.Google Scholar
Jones, O. T. & Pugh, W. J. 1949. An Early Ordovician shoreline in Radnorshire, near Builth Wells. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 105, 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, I. R., Emery, K. O. & Rittenburg, S. C. 1963. The distribution of and isotopic abundance of sulphur in recent marine sediments off southern California. Geochemica et Cosmochima Acta 27, 297–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lespérance, P. J. 1968. Ordovician and Silurian trilobite faunas of the White Head Formation, Perce region, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology 42, 811–26.Google Scholar
Lespérance, P. J. 1998. Trilobites of the Pabos Formation (Ashgillian, Upper Ordovician), Percé area, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology 72, 303–16.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1843. Notice of a new trilobite, Ceraurus crosotus. American Journal of Science 44, 346.Google Scholar
Macgregor, A. R. 1963. Upper Llandeilo Trilobites from the Berwyn Hills, North Wales. Palaeontology 5, 790–816.Google Scholar
Mcnamara, K. J. 1979. Trilobites from the Coniston Limestone Group (Ashgill Series) of the Lake District, England. Palaeontology 22, 53–92.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. (ed.) 1997. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part O. Arthopoda (Revised), Volume 1. Lawrence: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 530 pp.Google Scholar
Muramoto, J. A., Honjo, S., Fry, B., Hay, B. J., Howarth, R. W. & Cisne, J. L. 1991. Sulfur, iron and organic carbon fluxes in the Black Sea: sulfur isotropic evidence for origin of sulfur fluxes. Deep-Sea Research 38, S1151–87.Google Scholar
Phillips, W. E. A., Stillman, C. J. & Murphy, T. 1976. A Caledonian plate tectonics model. Journal of the Geological Society, London 132, 579–609.Google Scholar
Prantl, F. & Přibyl, A. 1949. A study of the superfamily Odontopleuracea nov. superfam. (trilobites). Rozpravy Státního Geologického ústavu ČSR 12, 1–221.Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. & Vaňek, J. 1965. Neue Trilobiten des Bohmischen Ordoviziums. Vestnik Ustredniho Ustav Geologicky 40, 277–82.Google Scholar
Price, D. 1980. The Ordovician trilobite fauna of the Sholeshook Limestone Formation of South Wales. Palaeontology 23, 839–87.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L. & Chatterton, B. D. E. 1991. Revision and subdivision of the polyphyletic “Leonaspis”. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 82, 333–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolf, A. D. & Larson, M. A. 1988. Theory of Particulate Processes, 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press Inc, 369 pp.Google Scholar
Richter, R. & Richter, E. 1917. Über die Einteilung der Familie Acidaspidinae und über einige ihrer devonischen Vertreter. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, for 1917, 462–72.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. 1910. New fossils from the Dufton Shales. Geological Magazine 7, 211–20.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. 1914. Supplement to the lower Palaeozoic trilobites of the Girvan district, Ayshire. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 329, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, M. 1982. A revision of the Portuguese Ordovician Odontopleuridae (Trilobita): Selnopeltis and Primaspis. Communiacacoes dos Servicos Geologicos de Portugal 68, 213–23.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. 1979. Additional trilobites from the Ordovician of Kentucky. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1066-D, 1–13.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1853. Figures and descriptions illustrative of British organic remains. Decade 7. Memoir of the Geological Survey of the United Kingdom, 1–78.Google Scholar
Salter, J. W. 1864. A monograph of the British Trilobites from Cambrian, Silurian and Devonian Formations. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 1, 1–80.Google Scholar
Siveter, D. 1989. Silurian trilobites from the Annascaul Inlier, Dingle Peninsula, Ireland. Palaeontology 32, 109–61.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1984. O českých trilobitech z rodu Orphanaspis, Selnopleltoides a Taemaspis (Odontopleuridae). Ústřední Ústav Geologický, Praha, Czechslovakia 153, 212–16.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. E. & Owen, A. W. 2008. Probing the deep shelf: a Lagerstätte from the Upper Ordovician of Girvan, southwestern Scotland. Lethaia 41, 139–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. T. 1981. British Wenlock trilobites. Part 2. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 134, 57–99.Google Scholar
Toghill, P. 2004. The Geology of Britain; An Introduction. Marlborough: Airlife Publishing, 244 pp.Google Scholar
Törnquist, S. L. 1884. Undersökningar öfver Siljansomrĺdets trilobitfauna. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Series C 66, 1–101.Google Scholar
Tripp, R. P. & Morris, S. F. 1986. The trilobite fauna of the Raheen Formation (Upper Caradoc), Co. Waterford, Ireland. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History Geological Series 40, 91–122.Google Scholar
Trench, A., Torsvik, T. H., Smethurst, M. A., Woodcock, N. H. & Metcalfe, R. 1991. A palaeomagnetic study of the Builth Wells-Llandrindod Wells Ordovician inlier, Wales; palaeogeographic and structural implications. Geophysical Journal International 105, 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, R. V. 2005. The “productivity versus preservation” controversy; cause, flaws, and resolution. SEPM Special Publication 82, 17–33.Google Scholar
Vinther, J., Van Roy, P. & Briggs, D. E. G. 2008. Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids. Nature 451, 185–8.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. 1934. Method for determining soil organic matter. Soil Science 37, 29–38.Google Scholar
Warburg, E. 1933. On the structure of the occipital ring of the Odontopleuridae. Arkiv för Zoologi 25A, 1–19.Google Scholar
Whittard, W. F. 1961. The Ordovician trilobites of the Shelve Inlier, west Shropshire pt. 5. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 491, 163–96.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1956. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites; the Odontopleuridae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. Harvard University 114, 153–288.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1962. The Ordovician trilobites of the Bala area, Merioneth. Part I. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 116, 1–32, pls 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1968. The Ordovician trilobites of the Bala area. Merioneth. Part IV. Palaeontographical Society Monograph 120, 93–138, pls 29–32.Google Scholar
Wilkin, R. T., Arthur, M. A. & Dean, W. E. 1997. History of water-column anoxia in the Black Sea indicated by pyrite framboid size distributions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 148, 517–25.Google Scholar
Wilkin, R. T. & Barnes, H. L. 1997. Pyrite formation in an anoxic estuarine basin. American Journal of Science 297, 620–50.Google Scholar
Wilkin, R. T., Barnes, H. L. & Brantley, S. L. 1996. The size distribution of framboidal pyrite in modern sediments; an indicator of redox conditions. Geochemica et Cosmochima Acta 60, 3897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar