Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T18:18:07.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—On Herpetopora, a New Genus Containing Three New Species of Cretaceous Cheilostome Polyzoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. D. Lang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a report on a visit of the Geologists' Association to the exhibits of Polyzoa and Corals in the Geological Department of the British Museum in February, 1913, the author had occasion to mention two related and unnamed species of uniserial Chalk Polyzoa that hitherto had appeared in records as Hippothoa dispersa (von Hagenow). neither of which was this species, nor did either belong to the genus Hippothoa, Lamouroux. Since one of these two forms is very common in the English Chalk and the other not rare, it is time for a description of them to be published, that collectors may have distinctive names for them. In addition, a third form that has occurred in England is described, and the rest of the species included in the genus are mentioned, so that an idea of the genus as a whole may be formed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1914 , pp. 5 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 5 note 1 Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xxiv, pt. iii, pp. 171–2, 1913.

page 5 note 2 Lamouroux, , Exposition Méthodique des genres de l'Ordre des Polypiers, 1821, p. 82.Google Scholar The genotype is the recent Hippothoa divaricata.

page 5 note 3 το ἑρπετόν, ‘a creeping thing.’

page 6 note 1 Reuss, Denk. d. Kaiserl. Akad. d. Wissensch. Wien, Bd. vii, p. 134, pl. xxviii, fig. 1, 1854.Google Scholar

page 6 note 2 D'Orbigny, , Paléontologie Française; Terrains Crétacés, vol. v, p. 386, pl. 711, figs. 9–11, 1852–1853.Google Scholar It is very doubtful whether this form should be placed here.

page 6 note 3 Novak, Denk. d. Kaiserl. Akad. d. Wissensch. Wien, Bd. xxxvii, pt. ii, p. 86, pl. iii, figs. 1–5, 1877.Google Scholar

page 6 note 4 Novak, , op. cit., p. 86, pl. ii, figs. 1, 2, 1877.Google Scholar

page 6 note 5 Hagenow, Von, 1839, Neues Jahrbuch f. Min., etc., p. 280.Google Scholar For figure see Marsson, , Pal. Abhandl., Bd. iv, Hft. i, p. 91, pl. ix, fig. 9, 1887.Google Scholar

page 6 note 6 Reuss, loc. cit.

page 7 note 1 D'Orbigny, loc. cit.

page 7 note 2 For references to the original descriptions of these species see footnote under Herpetopora anglica on p. 6.

page 7 note 3 Oval and elliptical used in the botanical sense, as denned, for instance, in. Asa Gray, 1879, Structural Botany, p. 95.