Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T22:48:23.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Miocene Echinoid from N.W. Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. G. Brighton
A. G. Brighton
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Material—The six more or less complete specimens and twelve fragments to be described are preserved in a coarse ferruginous sandstone. They were collected by Messrs. C. Barrington Brown and R. A. Baldry, who supply the following particulars of horizon and locality, and to whom the author is indebted for the opportunity of describing this interesting echinoid.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , February 1926 , pp. 61 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF WORKS REFERRED TO IN THE TEXT

1. Agassiz, L., Catalogus syslematicus Ectyporum Echinodermatum fossilium Musei Neocomensis, 1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Agassiz, L., “Monographies d'Echinodermes”: Famille des Clypéastroides, Seconde Monographie, Des Scutelles, 1841.Google Scholar
3. Agassiz, A., “Revision of the Echini”: Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. iii, 1872.Google Scholar
4. de Cortázar, D., “Descripcion de un nuevo Equinodermo de la Isla de Cuba, Encope ciae n.sp.”: Bol. Com. Mapa Geol. España, tome vii, pp. 227–32, pls. G, H, 1880.Google Scholar
5. Böse, E., “Sobre algunas Faunas Terciarias de México”: Inst. Geol. de México, Bol. No. 22, 1906.Google Scholar
6. Toula, F., “Die jungtertiäre Fauna von Gatun am Panamakanal”: Jahrb. k.k. geol. Reichsanst, vol. lxi, 1911, pp. 487–530, pls. xxx–xxxi.Google Scholar
7. Kew, W. S. W., “Tertiary Echinoids of the Carrizo Creek Region in the Colorado Desert”: Univ. Calif. Publ. Bull. Dept. Geol., vol. viii, 1914, pp. 39–60, pls. i–v.Google Scholar
8. Clark, H. L., “Hawaiian and other Pacific Echini”: Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. xlvi, 1914, No. 1.Google Scholar
9. Clark, W. B. and Twitchell, M. W., “The Mesozoic and Cenozoic Echinodermata of the United States”: U.S. Geol. Surv. Mon., vol. liv, 1915.Google Scholar
10. Jackson, R. T., “Fossil Echini of the Panama Canal Zone and Costa Rica”: Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. lviii, 1917, pp. 489–501, pls. 62–8. Reprinted in Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus., No. 103, 1918, pp. 103–16, pls. xlvi–lii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kew, W. S. W., “Cretaceous and Cenozoic Echinoidea of the Pacific Coast of North America”: Univ. Calif. Publ. Dept. Geol., vol. xii, No. 2, 1920, pp. 23–236, pls. 3–42.Google Scholar
12. Jackson, R. T., “Fossil Echini of the West Indies”: Contributions to the Geology and Palaeontology of the West Indies, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication No. 306, 1922, pp. 1–104, pls. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Vaughan, T. W., “Stratigraphic Significance of the Species of West Indian Fossil Echini”: Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 306, 1922, pp. 105–22.Google Scholar
14. Bosworth, T. O., The Geology and Palaeontology of North-West Peru, 8vo, London, 1922.Google Scholar
15. Spieker, E. M., “The Palaeontology of the Zorritos Formation of the North Peruvian Oil Fields”: John Hopkins University Studies in Geology, No. 3, 1922.Google Scholar
16. Clark, H. L., Catalogue of the Recent Sea-Urchins in the British Museum (Natural History), London, 1925.Google Scholar