Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:33:22.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a New Palaeolithic Industry from the Norfolk Coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. F. W. Baden-Powell  and
J. Reid Moir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Glacial deposits along the Norfolk and Suffolk coasts are important to geologists and archaeologists, as some of the formations here, even those which are later than the Cromer Forest Bed Series, are earlier than those of many other districts. Finds of Palaeolithic implements in this area have not so far been abundant, but an industry was recorded by us in 1938 (see Nature, 19th November, 1938, p. 912), and it is now possible to give greater details about its mode of occurrence. The geological dating of this industry will be discussed first, and the implements will then be considered from the archaeological point of view.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 79 , Issue 4 , August 1942 , pp. 209 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trimmer, J. Generalization respecting the Erratic Tertiaries or Northern Drift, founded on the mapping of the Superficial Deposits of a large part of Norfolk…. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., 7, 1851, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Trimmer, J. On the Upper and Lower Boulder-Clays of the Gorleston Cliff in Norfolk. Quart. J own. Geol. Soc., 14, 1858, 171–4.Google Scholar
3. Wood, S. V. Supplement to the “ Crag Mollusca ”. Mon. Palaeontogr. Soc., London (1872), Introduction.Google Scholar
4. Geikie, J. The Great Ice Age, 2nd ed., 1877.Google Scholar
5. Reid, C. The Glacial Deposits of Cromer. Geol. Mag., 17, 1880, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Woodward, H. B. The Glacial Drifts of Norfolk. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 9 1885, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Blake, J. H. The Geology of the Country near Yarmouth and Lowestoft. Mem. Geol. Surv., 1890.Google Scholar
8. Harmer, F. W. The Great Eastern Glacier. Geol. Mag., 1904, 509–510.Google Scholar
9. Boswell, P. G. H. On the occurrence of the North Sea Drift (Lower Glacial), and certain other brick-earths, in Suffolk. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 25, 1914, 121–153.Google Scholar
10. Moir, J. Reid. The Geological age of the earliest Palaeolithic Flint Implements. Geol. Mag., 1920, 221–4.Google Scholar
11. Boswell, P. G. H. The Stratigraphy of the Glacial Deposits of East Anglia in relation to Early Man. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 42, 1931, 37–111.Google Scholar
12. Boswell, P. G. H. Problems of the Borderland of Archaeology and Geology in Britain. Proc. Prehist. Soc., 1936, 149–160.Google Scholar
13. Sandford, K. S. Some Recent Contributions to the Pleistocene Succession in England. Geol. Mag., 69, 1932, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Solomon, J. D. The Glacial Succession on the North Norfolk Coast. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 43, 1932, 241–271.Google Scholar
15. Moir, J. Reid, and Baden-Powell, D. F. W. A Palaeolithic Industry from the Cromer District. Nature, 142, 1938, 912.Google Scholar
16. Harmer, F. W. The Pliocene Mollusca of Great Britain. Mon. Palaeontogr. Soc., London, 1914-1925.Google Scholar
17. Harmer, F. W. The Distribution of Erratics and Drift. Proc. Yorkshire Geol. Soc., xxx, 21, 1928, 79–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Whitaker, W., and Dalton, W. H. The Geology of the Country around Halesworth and Harleston. Mem. Geol. Surv., 1887.Google Scholar
19. Moir, J. Reid. The Silted-up Lake of Hoxne and its Flint Implements. Proc. Prehist. Soc. East Anglia, 5, part 2, 1926, 137–165.Google Scholar
20. Calkin, J. Bernard. Implements from the higher Raised Beaches of Sussex. Proc. Prehist. Soc., 7, part 3, 1934, 333–347.Google Scholar
21. Praeger, R. Lloyd. Report of the Larne Gravels Committee. Proc. Belfast Nat. Field Club, 2, 3, 1889-1890, 189–210.Google Scholar