Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
In the following notes I propose to chronicle a few works of early man other than chipped flints in this country, which during a long life have come under my own observation. They shall be arranged in order of antiquity, and, as might be expected, the earliest will be the most doubtful. Nevertheless, in anticipation of its being possibly confirmed by future discoveries it shall not be passed over.
page 218 note 1 1905, p. 573.
page 218 note 2 Moir, Proc. Prehistoric Soc. of East Anglia, 1911Google Scholar.
page 218 note 3 Q.J.G.S., vol. lxi, pp. 35–7, 1905Google Scholar.
page 219 note 1 Q.J.G.S., vol. xxii, p. 470Google Scholar.
page 219 note 2 See Professor Hughes, , Proc. Geol. Assoc, vol. xxii, pt. v, 1911Google Scholar.
page 219 note 3 Geologist, vol. iv, pp. 352–4, pl. ix, 1861Google Scholar.
page 220 note 1 Q.J.G.S., vol. xxxv, pp. 670–7, 1879Google Scholar.
page 221 note 1 See an exhaustive paper on the Pleistocene Mollusca of the neighbourhood of Cambridge, by Mrs. Hughes, McKenny, this Mag., 1888, p. 191Google Scholar.
