Skip to main content

Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union


This article argues for a radical recasting of the European Union democratic deficit debate. Critics have long argued that the EU suffers from a democratic deficit and that growing EU power undermines national democracy. But recent backsliding on democracy and the rule of law in Hungary and Poland reminds us that grave democratic deficits can also exist at the national level in member states and that the EU may have a role in addressing them. This article will place the EU’s struggles with democratic deficits in its member states in comparative perspective, drawing on the experience of other democracies that have struggled with pockets of subnational authoritarianism. Comparative analysis suggests that considerations driven by partisan politics may allow local pockets of autocracy to persist within otherwise democratic political unions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union
      Available formats
Hide All

R. Daniel Kelemen is Professor of Political Science and Jean Monnet Chair in European Union Politics at Rutgers University. Contact email:

Hide All
Agence France Presse (2015), ‘Polish ex-PM Kaczyński Slams Top Court at Pro-Government Rally’, 13 December.
Barroso J.M. (2012), ‘State of the Union 2012’, 12 September, speech at Plenary Session of European Parliament, Strasbourg, Speech/12/596,
Benton A. (2012), ‘Bottom-Up Challenges to National Democracy’, Comparative Politics, 44(3): 253271.
Bermeo N. (2016), ‘On Democratic Backsliding’, Journal of Democracy, 27(1): 519.
Blauberger M. and Kelemen R.D. (2016), ‘Can Courts Rescue National Democracy? Judicial Safeguards Against Democratic Backsliding in the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy, published early online, September,
Buckley N. and Foy H. (2016), ‘Poland’s New Government Finds a Model in Orbán’s Hungary’, Financial Times, 6 January.
Bugarič B. (2015), ‘A Crisis of Constitutional Democracy in Post-Communist Europe: “Lands In-Between” Democracy and Authoritarianism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13: 219245.
Chavez R.B. (2003), ‘The Construction of the Rule of Law in Argentina’, Comparative Politics, 35(4): 417437.
Cienski J. (2016a), ‘Warsaw Wants to BFF Cameron’, Politico Europe, 6 February,
Cienski J. (2016b), ‘Polish Judges Wrestle Warsaw Rulers’, Politico Europe, 8 March,
Cienski J. (2016c), ‘Poland’s PiS Tells Top Court to Stuff It’, Politico Europe, 9 March,
Cienski J. (2016d), ‘Poland Rebuked for “Crippling” High Court’, Politico Europe, 11 March,
Cienski J. and De la Baume M. (2016), ‘Poland Strikes Back at EU on Media Law’, Politico Europe, 8 January,
Closa C., Kochenov D. and Weiler J.H.H. (2014), ‘Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union’, EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2014/25, Florence.
De la Baume M. (2015), ‘Black Sheep in the European Parliament’, Politico Europe, 25 September,
De la Baume M. (2016), ‘EU Launches “Rule of Law” Probe of Poland’, Politico Europe, 13 January,
Deutsche Welle (2014), ‘OSCE: Hungary’s Ruling Fidesz Victory Because of “Undue Advantage”’, 7 April,
EPP Group (European People’s Party) (2013), ‘EP Report on Hungary: EPP Group Rejects the Use of Double Standards’, 3 July, (2015), ‘Hungary: MEPs Call for Threats to the Rule of Law to be Monitored’, 16 December,
EurActiv (2012), ‘Romania, Bulgaria Set to Fail Their Biggest Test’, 13 July,
European Commission (2016), ‘Commission Recommendation Regarding the Rule of Law in Poland’, 27 July 2016, C(2016)5703 final.
European Parliament (2013), ‘Resolution of 3 July 2013 on the Situation of Fundamental Rights: Standards and Practices in Hungary (Pursuant to the European Parliament Resolution of 16 February 2012)’, 2012/2130(INI), P7_TA(2013)0315, A7-0229/2013 [‘Tavares Report’].
European Parliament (2015), ‘Hungary: No Systemic Threat to Democracy, Says Commission, But Concerns Remain’, press release, 2 December.
European Parliament (2016), ‘Resolution of 13 April 2016 on the Situation in Poland’, 2015/3031(RSP), P8_TA(2016)0123.
Føllesdal A. and Hix S. (2006), ‘Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44: 533.
Fox J. (1994), ‘Latin America’s Emerging Local Politics’, Journal of Democracy, 5(2): 105116.
Foy H. (2016), ‘Jarsoław Kaczyński: Poland’s Kingmaker’, Financial Times, 26 February.
Freedom House (2012), ‘Nations in Transit, Hungary Country Report’,
Freedom House (2014), ‘Nations in Transit, Hungary Country Report’,
Freedom House (2015), ‘Nations in Transit, Hungary Country Report’,
Gera V. (2016), ‘Polish Constitutional Court Strikes Down New Rules on Court’, Associated Press, 9 March.
Gibson E. (2005), ‘Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries’, World Politics, 58: 101132.
Gibson E. (2012), Boundary Control (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Giraudy A. (2010), ‘The Politics of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Reproduction in Argentina and Mexico’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2: 5384.
Giraudy A. (2015), Democrats and Autocrats: Pathways of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity within Democratic Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Gervasoni C. (2010), ‘A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes’, World Politics, 62(2): 302340.
Grimm D. (1995), ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution?’, European Law Journal, 1(3): 282302.
The Guardian (2016), ‘Polish President Signs Bill Putting State Media Under Government Control’, 7 January,
Habermas J. (1995), ‘Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe Need a Constitution?”’, European Law Journal, 1(3): 303307.
Kelemen R.D. (2014), ‘A President for the People’, Foreign Affairs, 30 June,
Kelemen R.D. (2015a), ‘EPP ♥ Orbán’, Politico Europe, 18 June,
Kelemen R.D. (2015b), ‘Europe’s Hungary Problem’, Foreign Affairs, 20 September,
Kelemen R.D. (2016), ‘Poland’s Constitutional Crisis’, Foreign Affairs, 25 August,
Kirchik J. (2013), ‘EU Conservatives Have a Hungary Problem’, Spiegel Online, 29 May,
Kisilowski M. (2015), ‘Poland’s “Overnight Court” Breaks All the Rules’, Politico Europe, 8 December,
Kochenov D. (2015), ‘Biting Intergovernmentalism’, The Hague Journal of the Rule of Law, 7: 153174.
Kochenov D. and Pech L. (2016), ‘Better Late than Never? On the Commission’s Rule of Law Framework and its First Activation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5): 10621074.
Kroet C. (2016), ‘Luxembourg Foreign Minister: Hungary Should Leave EU’, Politico Europe, 13 September,
Levitz P. and Pop-Eleches G. (2010), ‘Why No Backsliding? The European Union’s Impact on Democracy and Governance Before and After Accession’, Comparative Political Studies, 43(4): 457485.
McMann K. (2006), Economic Autonomy and Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Müller J.W. (2013a), ‘Defending Democracy Within the EU’, Journal of Democracy, 24(2): 138–49.
Müller J.W. (2013b), ‘What, if Anything, is Wrong with a Copenhagen Commission?’, Transatlantic Academy Working Paper, 24 July.
Nicolaides K. (2013), ‘European Democracy and Its Crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2): 351369.
O’Donnell G. (1993), ‘On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems’, World Development, 21(8): 13551369.
Ost D. (2016), ‘Regime Change in Poland, Carried Out from Within’, The Nation, 8 January,
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. (2013), ‘Request for the Opening of a Monitoring Procedure in Respect of Hungary’, Resolution 1941, 25 June.
Perju V. (2015), ‘The Romanian Double Executive and the 2012 Constitutional Crisis’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1): 246278.
Peter L. (2013), ‘Hungary Row: EU Party Allies “Back Orban”’, BBC News, 17 April,
Pridham G. (2008), ‘The EU’s Political Conditionality and Post-Accession Tendencies: Comparisons from Slovakia and Latvia’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2): 365387.
Rankin J. (2016a), ‘Brussels Launches Unprecedented Inquiry into Rule of Law in Poland’, The Guardian, 13 January.
Rankin J. (2016b), ‘Poland’s Rule of Law Under Systemic Threat, Says EU Executive’, The Guardian, 27 July.
Reding V. (2013), ‘The EU and the Rule of Law – What Next?’, speech at Centre for European Policy Studies, 4 September, Brussels,
Riegert B. (2012), ‘In EU, Party Politics Unite and Divide’, Deutsche Welle, 19 July,
Sadursky W. (2010), ‘Adding Bite to a Bark: The Story of Article 7, EU Enlargement and Jörg Haider’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 16: 385.
Scheppele K.L. (2013a), ‘Guest Post: Constitutional Revenge’, blog, The Conscience of a Liberal, New York Times, 1 March.
Scheppele K.L. (2013b), ‘Not Your Father’s Authoritarianism: The Creation of the “Frankenstate”, Newsletter of the European Politics and Society Section of the American Political Science Association, Winter, pp. 5–9.
Scheppele K.L. (2015a), ‘Systemic Infringement Actions: How to Enforce EU Values without Treaty Change’, paper presented at the Council of European Studies Conference, 8–10 July 2015, Paris.
Scheppele K.L. (2015b), ‘Understanding Hungary’s Constitutional Revolution’, in A. Von Bogdandy and P. Sonnevend (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Oxford: Hart Publishing): 111–24.
Scheppele K.L. (2016), ‘EU Can Still Block Hungary’s Veto on Polish Sanctions’, Politico Europe, 11 January,
Sedelmeier U. (2014), ‘Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania After Accession’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1): 105121.
Simon Z. (2014), ‘Orban Says he Seeks to End Liberal Democracy in Hungary’, Bloomberg, 28 July,
Snyder R. (1999), ‘After the States Withdraws’, in W. Cornelius, T. Eisenstadt and J. Hindley (eds), Subnational Politics and Democratization in Mexico (La Jolla: Center for US-Mexican Studies, UCSD).
Spendzharova A.B. and Vachudova M.A. (2012), ‘Catching Up? Consolidating Liberal Democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after EU Accession’, West European Politics, 35(1): 3958.
Than K. (2013), ‘Hungary’s Orban Accuses Europe of “Soviet-style” Meddling’, Reuters, 5 July,
Venice Commission (2011), ‘Opinion on the New Constitution of Hungary’, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 87th Plenary Session, 17–18 June, Opinion 621/2011, CDL-AD(2011)016.
Venice Commission (2013), ‘Opinion on the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary’, 14–15 June. Opinion 720/2013. CDL-AD(2013) 012 at para. 144.1.
Venice Commission (2016), ‘Opinion on the Amendments to the Act of 25 June on the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland’, 11–12 March, Opinion 833/2015, CDL-AD(2016) at para. 137.
Von Bogdandy A. and Sonnevend P. (2015) (eds), Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area (Oxford: Hart Publishing).
Weiler J. (1995), ‘Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’, European Law Journal, 1(3): 219258.
Zalan E. (2015), ‘EP to Hold Debate on Kaczynski’s Poland’, EU Observer, 8 December,
Zeit Online (2015), ‘Merkel Weist Orbán Zurecht’, 2 February,
Zweifel T. (2002), ‘... Who is Without Sin Cast the First Stone: The EU’s Democratic Deficit in Comparison’, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5): 812840.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2604
Total number of PDF views: 1453 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3653 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th January 2017 - 12th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.