Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Engendering the ‘Crisis of Democracy’: Institutions, Representation and Participation

Abstract

Many democracies are widely perceived to be suffering a serious crisis of representation, participation and legitimacy. As part of this ‘crisis’, the male domination of democracy – both in terms of its institutions and who participates – has been identified as problematic, even emblematic, of a more generalized democratic crisis. Increasing the participation of women is advocated as one solution. Using examples drawn from both long-standing and newer democracies (parliamentary and presidential), particularly from Europe and Latin America, this article explores the gender dynamics of the ‘crisis of democracy’. The ‘crisis’ has two gendered aspects. First, and paradoxically, although democracy still privileges predominantly white, elite, heterosexual, men, more women now participate in democratic institutions, leading to claims that the ‘male monopoly’ has ended (Dahlerup and Leyenaar 2013). Second, the ‘crisis of democracy’ may provide opportunities to further enhance women’s participation, as the demands of those favouring greater gender equality and those looking for solutions to the ‘crisis’ appear to coincide.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Georgina Waylen is Professor of Politics at the University of Manchester. Contact email: georgina.waylen@manchester.ac.uk.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
AgerbergM., SundstromA. and WangnerudL. (2014), ‘Why Regime Type Affects the Link between Gender and Corruption’, paper presented at the IPSA Congress, Montreal, July.
AlexanderA. and JalalzaiF. (2014), ‘The Symbolic Effects of Female Heads of State and Government’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August.
AllenP., CuttsD. and CampbellR. (2014), ‘Measuring the Quality of Politicians Elected by Gender Quotas – Are They Any Different?’, Political Studies, published early online, September, doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12161.
AshcroftP. (2014), ‘Post-Referendum Scotland Poll’, Lord Ashcroft Polls, 18–19 September, www.lordashcroftpolls.com.
BeckwithK. (2014), ‘From Party Leader to Prime Minister?: Gender and Leadership Contests in Western Europe’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Salamanca, Spain, April.
BesleyT., FolkeO., PerssonT. and RickneJ. (2013), ‘Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man: Theory and Evidence from Sweden’, unpublished manuscript.
BjarnegårdE. (2013), Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
CampbellB. (2014), End of Equality (London: Seagull Books).
CaulM. (1999), ‘Women’s Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties’, Party Politics, 5(1): 7998.
ChappellL. (2014), ‘Newness, Oldness and Gender Justice Outcomes: A View from the International Criminal Court’, Politics and Gender, 10(4): 572594.
ChappellL. and WaylenG. (2013), ‘Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions’, Public Administration, 91(3): 599615.
ChildsS. and KrookM.L. (2009), ‘Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors’, Government and Opposition, 44(2): 125145.
ChildsS. and LovenduskiJ. (2013), ‘Political Representation’, in G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola and L. Weldon (eds), Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 489513.
CurtinJ., KerbyM. and DowdingK. (2014), ‘Gender and Promotion in the Executive: Cabinet Careers in the World of Westminster’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Salamanca, Spain, April.
DahlerupD. (2006) (ed.), Women, Quotas and Politics (London: Routledge).
DahlerupD. and LeyenaarM. (2013), Breaking Male Dominance in Old Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
DahlerupD. and NorrisP. (2014), ‘On the Fast Track: Why Gender Quota Laws Spread around the World’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August.
DaltonR. (2004), Democratic Challenges. Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
The Economist (2014), ‘What’s Gone Wrong with Democracy’, The Economist, 1 March.
ElshtainJ. (1981), Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
EncarnaciónO. (2014), ‘Gay Rights: Why Democracy Matters’, Journal of Democracy, 25(3): 90103.
EscobarM. and Taylor RobinsonM. (2014), ‘It’s All in the Resume: Comparing the Credentials and Political Capital Resources of Men and Women in Presidential Cabinets’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Salamanca, Spain, April.
Fortin-RittbergerJ. and RittbergerB. (2014), ‘Descriptive Representation in the European Parliament’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August.
FranceschetS. and PiscopoJ.M. (2008), ‘Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina’, Politics and Gender, 4(3): 393425.
FranceschetS. and ThomasG. (2011), ‘Gender and Executive Office: Analysing Parity Cabinets in Chile and Spain’, paper presented to ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik.
FranceschetS., KrookM.L. and PiscopoJ. (2012) (eds), The Impact of Gender Quotas: Women’s Descriptive, Substantive and Symbolic Representation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
FranceschetS., PiscopoJ. and ThomasG. (2013), ‘Super Madres’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Chicago, August.
HelmkeG. and LevitskyS. (2004), ‘Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda’, Perspectives on Politics, 2(4): 725740.
HinojosaM. (2012), Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press).
HtunM. and WeldonL. (2010), ‘When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy’, Perspectives on Politics, 8(1): 207216.
HuntingtonS. (1991), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) (2014), ‘Women in National Parliaments Database’, 1 December, www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm.
JalalzaiF. (2013), Shattered, Cracked or Firmly Intact? Women and the Executive Glass Ceiling Worldwide (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
KennyM. (2013), Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
KrookM.L. (2009), Quotas for Women in Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
KrookM.L. and MackayF. (2011) (eds), Gender, Politics, and Institutions: Toward a Feminist Institutionalism (Basingstoke: Palgrave).
KrookM.L. and O’BrienD. (2012), ‘All the President’s Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide’, Journal of Politics, 74(3): 840855.
KrookM.L. and Restrepo-SanisJ. (2014), ‘Violence Against Women in Politics: Concepts and Policy Solutions’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August.
LawlessJ. and FoxR. (2010), It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
LovenduskiJ. and NorrisP. (1993) (eds), Gender and Party Politics (London: Sage).
MackayF. (2014), ‘Remembering the Old, Forgetting the New: “Nested Newness” and the Limits of Gendered Institutional Change’, Politics and Gender, 10(4): 459471.
Mueller-RommelF., KubbeI. and VercesiM. (2014), ‘How Women Become Prime Minister in Europe’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Salamanca, Spain, April.
MurrayR. (2014), ‘Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All’, American Political Science Review, 108(3): 520532.
NorrisP. (1991), ‘Gender Differences in Political Participation in Britain: Traditional, Radical and Revisionist Models’, Government and Opposition, 26(1): 5674.
O’BrienD. (2014), ‘Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Salamanca, Spain, April.
O’BrienD. and SavignyH. (2014), ‘Female Politicians in the British Press’, Journalism Education, 3(1): 627.
PatemanC. (1983a), Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy’, in S. Benn and G. Gaus (eds), The Public and Private in Social Life (London: Croom Helm): 281303.
PatemanC. (1983b), Feminism and Democracy’, in G. Duncan (ed.), Democratic Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 204217.
PatemanC. (1989), The Sexual Contract (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
PaxtonP. (2000), ‘Women’s Suffrage in the Measurement of Democracy: Problems of Operationalization’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 35: 92111.
PhillipsA. (1991), Engendering Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
PhillipsA. (1992), ‘Must Feminists Give up on Liberal Democracy’, Political Studies, 40(1): 6882.
PhillipsA. (1993), Democracy and Difference (Cambridge: Polity Press).
PruglE. (2012), ‘“If Lehmann Brothers Had Been Lehmann Sisters ...” Gender and Myth in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis’, International Political Sociology, 6: 2135.
RandallV. (1982), Women and Politics (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
Reyes-HouseholderC. and Schwindt-BayerL. (2014), ‘The Presence of Presidentas: Consequences for Political Attitudes and Participation’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August.
RueschmeyerD., StephensE.H. and StephensJ.D. (1992), Capitalist Development and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Schwindt-BayerL. (2010), Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Schwindt-BayerL. and WiesehemeierN. (2014), ‘Selecting and Electing Women in Spain’, paper presented to the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, August.
SiimB. (2013), ‘Citizenship’, in G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola and L. Weldon (eds), Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 756780.
StaabS. and WaylenG. (2014), ‘Gender, Politics and Institutions in Bachelet’s Chile’, paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Salamanca, April.
StetsonD., MazurA. (1995) (eds), Comparative State Feminism (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
SwersM. (2002), The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
SwersM. (2013), Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
TrippA.M. (2013a), Political Systems and Gender’, in G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola and L. Weldon (eds), Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 514535.
TrippA.M. (2013b), ‘Women’s Movements and Constitution Making after Civil War and Violent Upheaval in Africa’, paper presented at Gendering New Institutions Workshop, Manchester, November.
WaylenG. (1994), ‘Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relations in Transition Politics’, World Politics, 46(3): 327354.
WaylenG. (1998), ‘Gender, Feminism and the State’, in V. Randall and G. Waylen (eds), Gender, Politics and the State (London: Routledge): 117.
WaylenG. (2000), ‘Gender and Democratic Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Argentina and Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 32(3): 765793.
WaylenG. (2007), Engendering Transitions: Women’s Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
WaylenG. (2008), ‘Transforming Global Governance: Challenges and Opportunities’, in S. Rai and G. Waylen (eds), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave): 254275.
WaylenG. (2014a), Informal Institutions, Institutional Change and Gender Equality’, Political Research Quarterly, 67(1): 212223.
WaylenG. (2014b), ‘A Seat at the Table – Is it Enough? Gender and Multiparty Negotiations in South Africa and Northern Ireland’, Politics and Gender, 10(4): 495523.
WaylenG., CelisK., KantolaJ. and WeldonL. (2013) (eds), Oxford Handbook on Gender and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
YoungI.M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 177 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 491 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.