Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary

  • Takis S. Pappas
Abstract

This article makes the case for a novel democratic subtype, populist democracy, indicating a situation in which both the party in office and at least the major opposition force(s) in a pluralist system are populist. Based on a minimal definition of populism as ‘democratic illiberalism’, and through the comparative analysis of post-authoritarian Greece and post-communist Hungary, the article reveals the particular stages, as well as the causal mechanisms, that may prompt the emergence of populist democracy in contemporary politics. It also points to the tendency of such systems to produce polarized two-party systems, and it calls for further research on the topic.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Populist Democracies: Post-Authoritarian Greece and Post-Communist Hungary
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Takis S. Pappas is Associate Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece, and Marie Curie Research Fellow in the Department of Political Social Sciences at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy. Contact email: takis.s.pappas@gmail.com.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Alivizatos, N. (1990), ‘The Difficulties of “Rationalization” in a Polarized Political System: The Greek Chamber of Deputies’, in U. Liebert and M. Cotta (eds), Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain and Turkey (London and New York: Pinter): 131153.
Berezin, M. (2009), Illiberal Politics in Neoliberal Times: Culture, Security and Populism in the New Europe (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
Bozóki, A. (2008), ‘Consolidation or Second Revolution? The Emergence of the New Right in Hungary’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24(2): 191231.
Canovan, M. (1999), ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, 47(1): 216.
Collier, D.Levitsky, S. (1997), ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’, World Politics, 49(3): 430451.
Croissant, A.Merkel, W. (2004), ‘Introduction: Democratization in the Early Twenty-First Century’, Democratization, 11(5): 19.
Dahl, R.A. (1956), A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Diamandouros, P.N. (1986), ‘Regime Change and the Prospects of Democracy in Greece, 1974–1983’, in G. O'Donnell, P.C. Schmitter and L. Whitehead (eds), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press), vol. 1: 138164.
Enyedi, Z. (2005), ‘The Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation’, European Journal of Political Research, 44(5): 697720.
Featherstone, K. (1990), ‘Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Greece’, in G. Pridham (ed.), Securing Democracy: Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe (London: Routledge): 179202.
Featherstone, K. (1994), ‘The Challenge of Liberalisation: Parties and the State in Greece after the 1993 Elections’, Democratization, 1/2: 280294.
Fowler, B. (2004), ‘Concentrated Orange: Fidesz and the Remaking of the Hungarian Centre-Right, 1994–2002’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 20: 80114.
Goertz, G. (2006), Social Science Concepts. A User's Guide (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Gray, J. (2000), Two Faces of Liberalism (New York: New Press).
Hanley, S., Szczerbiak, A., Houghton, T.Fowler, B. (2008), ‘Sticking Together: Explaining Comparative Centre-Right Party Success in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe’, Party Politics, 14(4): 387405.
Hawkins, K.A. (2009), ‘Is Chavez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 42(8): 10401067.
Illonszki, G.Kurtán, S. (2003), ‘Hungary’, European Journal of Political Research, 42(7–8): 967974.
—— ——Illonszki, G.Kurtán, S. (2007), ‘Hungary’, European Journal of Political Research, 46(7–8): 966973.
Kalyvas, S.N. (1997), ‘Polarization in Greek Politics: PASOK's First Four Years, 1981–1985’, Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora, 23(1): 83104.
Körösényi, A. (1999), Government and Politics in Hungary (Budapest: Central European University Press).
Laclau, E. (1977), Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism – Fascism – Populism (London: Verso).
Levitsky, S.Way, L.A. (2010), Competitive Authoritarianism: The Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes in the Post-Cold War Era (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Lijphart, A. (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press).
Lomax, B. (2007), ‘The Strange Death of “Civil Society” in Post-Communist Hungary’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 13(1): 4163.
Lyrintzis, C. (2005), ‘The Changing Party System: Stable Democracy, Contested “Modernisation” ’, West European Politics, 28(2): 242259.
Malefakis, E. (1995), ‘The Political and Socioeconomic Contours of Southern European History’, in R. Gunther, H.-J. Puhle and P.N. Diamandouros (eds), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective (London and Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press): 3376.
Mavrogordatos, G.Th. (1984), ‘The Greek Party System: A Case of Polarized but Limited Pluralism?’, West European Politics, 7(4): 156169.
Mény, Y.Surel, Y. (2002), ‘The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism’, in Y. Mény and Y. Surel (eds), Democracies and the Populist Challenge (Houndmills: Palgrave): 121.
Mudde, C. (2004), ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39(4): 541563.
Mudde, C.Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012a), ‘Populism and (Liberal) Democracy’, in C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 126.
—— ——Mudde, C.Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2012b), ‘Populism: Corrective and Threat to Democracy’, in C. Mudde and C. Rovira Kaltwasser (eds), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 205222.
New Democracy (1987), Economic Program (Athens: ND Party Secretariat).
Nicolacopoulos, I. (2005), ‘Elections and Voters, 1974–2004: Old Cleavages and New Issues’, West European Politics, 28(2): 260278.
Oakeshott, M. (1996), The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism, ed. T. Fuller. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
O'Donnell, G. (1994), ‘Delegative Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 5569.
Palonen, E. (2009), ‘Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary’, Parliamentary Affairs, 62(2): 318334.
Panebianco, A. (1988), Political Parties: Organization and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Papadopoulos, Y. (1989), ‘Parties, the State and Society in Greece: Continuity within Change’, West European Politics, 12(2): 5471.
Pappas, T.S. (1999), Making Party Democracy in Greece (Houndmills: Palgrave).
Pappas, T.S. (2003), ‘The Transformation of the Greek Party System Since 1951’, West European Politics, 26(2): 90114.
Pappas, T.S. (2012), ‘Il carisma politico’, Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 3: 369384.
Pridham, G.Verney, S. (1991), ‘The Coalitions of 1989–90 in Greece: Inter-Party Relations and Democratic Consolidation’, West European Politics, 14(4): 4269.
Rajacic, A. (2007), ‘Populist Construction of the Past and Future: Emotional Campaigning in Hungary between 2002 and 2006’, East European Politics and Societies, 21(4): 639660.
Rawls, J. (2005), Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).
Riker, W.H. (1982), Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice (New York: Waveland Press).
Sartori, G. (1976), Parties and Party Systems: A Framework of Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Sartori, G. (1984), ‘Guidelines for Concept Analysis’, in G. Sartori (ed.), Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis (Beverly Hills and London: Sage).
Schöpflin, G. (2007), ‘Democracy, Populism, and the Political Crisis in Hungary: A Reply to Thomas von Ahn’, Eurozine, www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-05-07-schopflin-en.html.
Seferiades, S. (1986), ‘Polarization and Nonproportionality: The Greek Party System in the Postwar Era’, Comparative Politics, 19(1): 6993.
Sitter, N. (2011), ‘Absolute Power? Hungary Twenty Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall’, in E. Bakke and I. Peters (eds), 20 Years since the Fall of the Berlin Wall (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag): 221248.
Villalón, L.A. (1994), ‘Democratizing a (Quasi) Democracy: The Senegalese Elections of 1993’, African Affairs, 93(371): 163193.
Zakaria, F. (2003), The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad (New York: W.W. Norton).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×